Sentences with phrase «believe something different about»

Because we believe something different about what happens to us after we die?

Not exact matches

I can understand why there might be questions about something new that's different, but we've really tried to do it from the point of view of the publishers, and we believe that we can create an environments that's actually really great for the publishers, really great for the readers, and also really great for the advertisers.

I guess sometimes it's humbling to sit and think about how many people believe in every different religion no matter how different they are and then science and accepting the fact that a HUGE majority of people are going to be right or wrong when they die and some people spending their entire life trying to justify or prove something that may be wrong.

It is about believing in something better than ourselves helping us in our lives, knowing spirituality (totally different than religion), being humble (after experiencing humiliation) and daily addressing our character defects and the wrong we have done upon others.

Context: Last night I was shooting the breeze with my roommates when one of them brought up religion and how it was a «good thing to grow up with religion because it gives children something to believe in», when I countered that there are many different things children can believe in growing up without having to resort to something like religion, I basically had to sit there for 10 minutes about how atheism ruins lives because it makes everyone apathetic and despondent.

Looking at what Wenger has had to say and the kind of players Arsenal are being linked with, I am prepared to go out on a limb and believe that something is really different about the club's approach to this transfer window.

It wasn't even the subject of my comment, so yet again more demonstration that some fans will believe what they like and argue about something entirely different to what's said.

There is an entirely different presence about taking something you know and believe makes you better than there is if you don't fully believe and trust that to be true.

I believe every one of us has something we don't like about our bodies but that's why we are all created different and one person's taste maybe be just the opposite from another.

That said, I've long believed that charter schools have a subtle advantage because they are schools of choice; by definition, there's something different about the families who choose them for their children and those who don't.

I learn it, I question it, I test it, I don't believe the test, I learn more, I test that, I try it a different way, I test it again, and again and then eventually I know more about something than most people around me.

And something happens in the world and the two sets of blogs respond to the event in such different ways that you can hardly believe that they are talking about the same fact pattern?

We're not talking about tactical investment strategies here — I believe that's something for a different post altogether!

In some cases, the politicians truly believe that there is something «different» about a certain breed or two, but in most cases, the targeting of certain types of dogs is purely designed to appease a misinformed and frightened public without having to put time, effort, and money into solving the problem of dog bites by all breeds.

Interview questions are limited to Rare Replay, sorry not a chance of me leaking any future, potential maybe projects J — what I would say is Rare's development philosophy is to create surprising and delightful games that players will love, this means its less about a remake and more about we would need feel that we could take a genre or IP further, do something different and push boundaries with a specific game — We will do this with Sea of Thieves which is why it's the right next game from Rare, I actually believe we have done this with Rare Replay — there is no collection like this!

And, I suppose there's some reason to consider there's some basis for believing the fact that the Ontario Court of Appeal and the British Columbia Court of Appeal seem to have different views on the law regarding causation could be some basis for believing there's something about the law regarding causation that's a wee bit controversial (even accepting that the division of powers structure in the Constitution Act means that that conflict IS constitutional).

I realize now, that it reflects something entirely different about the people inside that home than I once so foolishly believed.