Sentences with phrase «believe such a place»

How the landscape looked like it was painted with pure pigment, and that I couldn't believe such a place could exist.

Not exact matches

Although, VirtualArmour believes that the expectations and assumptions on which such forward - looking information is based are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on the forward - looking information as VirtualArmour can not provide any assurance that it will prove to be correct.

I believe that there are a few potential outcomes of such mis - informed law - making, which are likely to take place because of the SEC's mis - informed decision - making.

«Are you aware of anyone in leadership at Facebook who was in a conversation where a decision was made not to inform your users,» she asked, «or do you believe no such conversation ever took place?»

Although it is currently believed that the expectations reflected in such forward - looking statements are reasonable, no assurance can be given that such expectations will prove to have been correct and persons reading this press release are therefore cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward - looking statements which speak only as of the date of this press release.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward - looking statements are reasonable, such statements involve risks and uncertainties, and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements and they should not be interpreted as confirming market or analysts» expectations in any way.

Bitcoin may go to zero or it may go to a million, I can not see the future, but to believe that a «Bitcoin type» of crypto - currency is not going to replace it is wrong and the development of such coins are now taking place throughout the financial world.

Based on what I have been told by members of the public and reviewed in publicly available documents, I believe violations to the Commodity Exchange Act have taken place in silver markets and that any such violation of the law in this regard should be prosecuted.»

I won't unfriend you because you believe differently than I do, I just don't need more theologians as my friends on Facebook who speak with such confidence when it comes to someone's place in eternity.

While Buddism is definitely prevalent in places such as China, it is not a Buddist nation (by my understanding, I believe China actively opposes any religion, but I could be wrong.)

I don't believe there is such a thing as Heaven, so it doesn't concern me whether or not you think I'll go to a non-existent place.

I know you think that it is because there is no such God, but if I as a believer that believes there is such a God, that belief would only fit if I believe that God actually let us have that freedom to choose in the first place.

sorry bud, but it's your preterism falls flat... in one place in Rev it says satan was chained and thrown into hell... I asked a preterist believing fellow about that since there is such incredible evil in the world, and he had the nerve to explain, «well, ya got ta understand, satan is on a looo — onng chain!»

I believe that human actors who fail to give pride of place to moral boundaries that must never be crossed, such as the direct killing of the innocent, and who instead are ready to see their obligations in terms of moving beyond them in favor of «good results,» will be harder put «to take seriously the role that divine authority plays in morality»; for they will to that extent lose a sense of the moral limits that remind us of our finitude and anticipate consideration of a law of our being that is not one of our making.

Do you see Atheists threatening people with imaginary places such as hell for not believing the same?

He did not inform these places of employment directly that he was performing an experiment that made him unable to fulfill his duties (such as helping believing dissertation - writing students through a difficult time of life and faith) anymore or agree to the belief statement he promised to adhere to anymore.

Anyone who believes in the resurrection when there is no other place in recorded history of such a thing happening is simply not worthy of debating with.

Since we are Unitarian in our theology, those who believe in the Trinity might find themselves feeling out of place, although such a belief would not cause us to show you the door.

If you think that sins of all mankind were somehow excused and blotted out simply because some sinless person got murdered, you really should ask yourself why you would believe such a thing in the first place.

But most Christians believe that God provides such an eternal dwelling place for those who love him.

To talk in that fashion is not to speak of a kind of meaningless re-enactment of what went on in the creation; it is to speak of a vital, living, and ongoing movement, where God knows and experiences (if that word is, as I believe, appropriate to the divine life) that which has taken place, but knows it and experiences it with a continuing freshness and delight — and, if what has taken place has been evil, with a continuing tinge of sadness and regret — such as must be proper to the chief creative and chief receptive agency who is worshiped and served by God's human children.

The fact that he can grant this yet not give such possibility a greater place in his narrative suggests that, with respect to the question of the relation between politics and ethics at least, Taylor is not at all a modem, however much he may believe that the modem identity brings with it some genuine goods.

Considering that that's exactly what religion does — convince people that the only way they can possibly be seen as a good person is to believe in what they tell you to — it doesn't seem like such a hard one to figure out just how we got to this place.

We happen to value honesty enough to say we do not believe in your god due to an overwhelming lack of evidence that such a being even exists in the first place.

i am sorry J.W but i don't believe there is a god of any kind... if there was a god, why would such a so called all powerful being allow for the treatment of its creation by its creation... the argument of free will is an old and tired one... if the existence was true and the laws put in place to honor such a creature were equally upheld by god then i would have been punished a long long time ago and so would have the majority of people... believer or not!

The laypeople may be tempted to believe that such places are blessed, and be driven to commit acts of disbelief.

I believe that there is an important place for choice when it comes to belief, but I suspect to a mysterious and significant degree that much is ultimately determined for each one of us, though not necessarily in such as way that could be rendered permanent, though for many I suspect this might very well be the case.

And there are also quite a few people who left that place that may not seek therapy but who openly struggle with faith - threatening questions about God and the Christian journey because what was said and what was done there were in such severe contradiction they just don't know what to believe anymore.

I know, I know... you do not believe it a sin, even though it is clearly stated as such in many places of Scripture.

Jesus would have suffered in vain if there is such a place, then we are probably all going there But like I said I do not believe in HELL because hell is full of hate and pain and misery, quite the opposite of God.

If there is a hell, I'm sure your imaginary friends imaginary nemesis has a special place reserved especially for you given how poorly you treat people and if you seriously believe people as miserable and hateful as you are going to this imaginary place called heaven, not many intelligent people would wish to be around such a hateful, bigoted, uneducated person like you.

An Emergent definition of relevance, modulated by resistance, might run something like this; relevance means listening before speaking; relevance means interpreting the culture to itself by noting the ways in which certain cultural productions gesture toward a transcendent grace and beauty; relevance means being ready to give an account for the hope that we have and being in places where someone might actually ask; relevance means believing that we might learn something from those who are most unlike us; relevance means not so much translating the churches language to the culture as translating the culture's language back to the church; relevance means making theological sense of the depth that people discover in the oddest places of ordinary living and then using that experience to draw them to the source of that depth (Augustine seems to imply such a move in his reflections on beauty and transience in his Confessions).

I believe that such transformation is already taking place at the periphery of each tradition.

They have placed such a greater burden on themselves than is necessary that they are threatening their own marriage and those who would believe that their way is the «right» way.

Like others promoting a dialogue between religion and economics (such as Lorna Gold in The Sharing Economy), I believe that there must be a place for religion in our quest to find solutions to the deepening crises of injustice and inequality in the globalized economy.

Of course, it might be argued that in enjoying or discussing a magic act, for example, we are implicitly acknowledging the conceivability of a rabbit arising from absolute nonbeing even while not believing that such a transition has in fact taken place.

My children shake their heads at the stories of segregation in schools, restaurants and doctors» offices, unable to believe such things took place in their parents» lifetimes.

To those who believe that the expression «inculturation» could still be redeemed from the misconceptions to which it is open, it should be made clear that such redemption would require, in the first place, the undergirding of the concept with a fresh and different conception of universality.

Deception in many forms can effect us all but its when such thoughts lead people to rejecting Christ completely ie don't believe in Him then that is a very bad place to be.

The fact that they said it in the first place means more to bigots that believe such nonsense than an «apology» ever will.

They call this hash brown in some places I believe that such simple dishes can taste really good.

In addition, Innovative Dining Group may disclose personally identifiable information about you to other companies or individuals in the following circumstances: - Innovative Dining Group utilizes third party service providers to provide products, services or functions on IDG's behalf (such as sending emails or processing credit cards or fulfilling orders placed online) and asks these service providers to agree to maintain the confidentiality of your personally identifiable information and not to use your personally identifiable information for any reason except to carry out the purpose (s) for which we retained them; - Innovative Dining Group needs to protect its legal rights (e.g., if Innovative Dining Group is trying to collect money you owe); - Innovative Dining Group must comply with applicable laws, regulations or legal or regulatory processes; - Innovative Dining Group has reason to believe that someone may be causing injury to someone or interfering with - In connection with a sale, merger, transfer, exchange or other disposition of all or a portion of the business conducted by the web site.

whether for the right or wrong reasons, our leader chose to stay on when things took a turn of sorts... a new owner arrived on the scene, plans for a new stadium emerged and Wenger became the bearer of bad news... he sold us on a new story, one that required patience on our parts... financial constraints were the order of the day, so that the enormous sums spent on the new venue could be recouped... although some would question the validity of such claims, why wouldn't they believe their faithful leader... according to those within the hierarchy, the future never looked so bright, as this new home would ensure our place among the elites for years to come... as we all know now these claims were a well constructed fabrication and so those who feel they were duped in the process are infuriated and rightly so... the fact that this club and it's manager have continually misled the fans, especially following Gazidis's claims about our financial liquidity, simply rubbed more salt in an already gaping wound... this surely isn't how you treat your «family», especially when they supported you through the supposed «lean» years... it was a dirty trick played by Kroenke but the fact is was orchestrated by Wenger himself hurt the most... as for those in the media, many of whom are former players or longtime pundits, who observed the early years firsthand, saw this as the perfect opportunity to vent the anger they felt towards this pretentious man once and for all... all in all, karma's a bitch

there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark

By that I mean we finished 11 points of top place last season and Man City, Man Utd and Chelsea won't have such bad seasons as they did last season so do we believe that Xhaka and Holding are going to provide us with the additional 10 - 15 points that we'd probably need to win the title?

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

never waste CAPITAL LETTERS on an article about Chambers at this juncture... I still can't believe that no one from management has ever explained why such a frugal club spent so much money on him in the first place... we haggle for months and years with clubs for players who could have a monumental impact on the very future of our club but somehow we found $ 16 million for someone who couldn't regularly crack a Southampton lineup (very fishy)... don't get me wrong, I like what he showed at times last season in Middlesbourogh but from the handful of games I watched him play I still have some serious questions about his consistency as a back - line player in the EPL; as such he should prove himself on loan for another season, making sure that he goes to a team that wants him in the starting 11... bottom line, let's not get bogged down with the semantics of peripheral players and focus on the real task at hand = figure out who the hell is going to be our starting 11 for the foreseeable future, which means getting contracts signed, getting rid of a lot of deadwood and bringing in talented players into the positions which truly need upgrading... the rest is just unnecessary noise

Meanwhile Force India's chief operating officer Otmar Szafnauer believes such is Mekies» knowledge that he should be placed on gardening leave for a year.

As Far as replacement is concern in midfield I believe Marcos Senna should be bought in he is such as strong personality in the midfield and can fill in the place of Flamini.

The authors ultimately believe it's not dinner per se that matters so much, but the amount of time parents engage meaningfully with their children, and mealtimes are just one setting where such interaction can take place.