No one who
believes in evolution thinks that things just appeared, that's called creationism.
Not exact matches
«I went and I met with Steve Jobs,» says Zuckerberg, «and he said that to reconnect with what I
believed was the mission of the company, I should go visit this temple
in India that he had gone to early
in the
evolution of Apple, when he was
thinking about what he wanted his vision of the future to be.»
Early on
in our history when things weren't really going well — we had hit a tough patch and a lot of people wanted to buy Facebook — I went and I met with Steve Jobs, and he said that to reconnect with what I
believed was the mission of the company, I should go visit this temple
in India that he had gone to early
in the
evolution of Apple, when he was
thinking about what he wanted his vision of the future to be... That reinforced to me the importance of what we were doing, and that is something I will always remember.
the natural cycle would be for man to grow up Stop
Believing In Gods All Together.They said that it's stupid for any one to say theres no god They have no proof.Ok After Going Crazy i called them PHONY For never getting mad or angry OR CURSING.Then I Insulted Joseph Smith for being a HABITUAL LIAR.After Telling them That
evolution is right.And Their Religion Is RIGHT NEXT TO SCIENTOLOGY
In Made Up Horse Crap Then kicking them out.I Started To
Think (NO Not about god He doesn't exist) But of science He said no one can proof there's no god.
Also, what makes you
think that I don't
believe in evolution or that I truly
believe that the age of this planet is for certain not that
in which geologists say it is.
I don't know what you mean by
believing in evolution, but I
think that it appears the life as we know it evolves.
What amazes me is that you know that thousands of people much smarter than you
believe in evolution, yet you
think it's those of us who share their views who are the crazy ones.
48 % of Americans
believe in creation, and don't
believe in evolution, so I would probably
think this is either accurate, or a low estimate.
I personally
believe that the mission of reconciliation is not just between sin and redemption
in this modern age — I
think that some of us also have a mission of helping to reconcile the world we are discovering with the world painted for us
in the Bible, and
evolution is a huge part of that.
Evolution is what you
believe when you can't
think for yourself and when you don't
believe in science.
- LIE All atheists
believe in evolution, which means they don't
believe in morality and
think we should all act like animals.
† All atheists
believe in evolution, which means they don't
believe in morality and
think we should all act like animals.
I have seen people, previously inclined to
believe whatever «science says,» become skeptical when they realize that the scientists actually do seem to
think that variations
in finch beaks or peppered moths, or the mere existence of fossils, proves all the vast claims of «
evolution.»
I wonder how many scientists, especially
in the USA, have ceased to
believe in God because they
believe in evolution, and
think that incompatible with faith
in God?
Also, I
think it reinforces the notion that one must choose between
believing in evolution and
believing in a loving, personal God - a common myth on both sides of the creation /
evolution debate.What do you
think?
plus science supposedly says we are product of
evolution... that does not jive with reality... you
think science has all the answers... sorry jack.it don't... now I DO
believe in a degree of
evolution... different types of cats, different types of dogs,,, etc...
I
believe that no one does the math — the logic of math is
in favour of creation over
evolution — «random chance» aka
evolution is mathematically to astounding to
believe — Alfred Hoyles number don't lie... and dna is a code — random chance can not create a code sequence nor can random chance ever improve itself... just
think about it — mathmatically speaking there is a god or creator or creators of the code for life.
Isn't it amazing
thinking, physics and mechanics work, but there is no design, just random happenstance... Takes more faith to
believe in evolution than that God actually created the world we know.
As much as I
believe in evolution, I
think that you are misguided, people are bigger today because we have better nutrition, just look at North Korea, they are smaller on average than everyone else and the reason is their lack of food.
Jason, I
think you are largely correct, but just
think, every president has been christian, almost every politician is christian — even every candidate from the republican side claimed NOT to
believe in evolution..
You
think you need faith to
believe in evolution but yet you don't feel the same about your imaginary friend god.
Unfortunately the religion that i follow the basis of makes everyone
think that I am not open to the concept that I can be wrong, My religion says that i shouldn't
believe in evolution but I do, My religion says that I shouldn't accept gay's, but I do, and my religion says I shouldn't have sex before marriage, but I do.
That such people have any rational basis for their skepticism is out of the question, of course, and Dawkins tells us exactly what to
think of them: «It is absolutely safe to say that if you meet somebody who claims not to
believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid, or insane (or wicked, but I'd rather not consider that).»
We generally
believe in evolution, and so do not nearly place ourselves on the same kind of pedestals that
evolution deniers do by
thinking that they are modeled on some perfect being.
We are not evangelicals who
think that the world was made
in 7 days and that dinosaurs didn't exist, and yes we do
believe in adaptation and can also
believe in science and
evolution while still
believing in our religion.
to J.W. and fred — i
think its rather silly to argue anything as fact if its cleary
thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the FACT that what you
BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like
evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible
in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most def.
You
think that human beings are merely the products of blind, uncaring,
evolution but when it comes to human reason (a product of the same process) we can
believe in it without question!
I used to
believe in evolution, and didn't
think the Bible could possibly be true.
I don't
think BIll Nye would have an issue with someone that
believes in theistic
evolution.
Scientists who are christian and understand
evolution but
think it has many errors
believe in evolution..
According to Giberson and Stephens, you might be an anti-intellectual fundamentalist if you are an evangelical who: dismisses
evolution as «an unproven theory»; deny that «climate change is real and caused by humans»;
think that «the founders were evangelicals who intended America to be a Christian nation»; defend spanking children;
believe in traditional roles for the sexes;
think that reparative therapy can «cure» homosexuality; and / or oppose gay marriage.
@Shamrock, enlighten me please, if you neither
believe in creationism or
evolution how do you
think we came to be?
i always
thought evolution was a bunch of crap when i was a kid and now thanks to all of these post of ppl whom
believe in this new form of religion i now know it is indeed a bunch if not a all crap....
Should I have the money, and a child
in the public education system, I belive I could take the issue to court and win that educators must always preface any remark that deals with the theory of
evolution with statements such as: «it is
thought» or «there is reason to
believe» or some or qualifying statement indicating that it is just a theory, not fact.
However, I
think you CAN
believe in creationism and
evolution at the same time.
A US poll with comparable questions by CBS News
in October 2005 found 48 % of Americans
believed in creationism, 29 %
thought that
evolution had been guided by God and only 15 %
believed man had evolved from less developed life forms but God had no role
in the process.
A: I would say that was more of a concern early on for a couple reasons: One, it was early and we didn't know what the response was going to be, but two, we used to only do
evolution jokes, and I
think the majority of the country still doesn't
believe in evolution.
The way we
think, talk, act, remember,
believe and function within a social society are all heavily influenced by the secretion of hormones from glands
in the brain and body, which have been designed and refined over the course of human
evolution to kick
in when we need them, and deliver the beneficial effects that we all know so well.
I
think this is an important conversation to be having with Amazon, as I
believe this sort of «virtual watercooler» type of interaction between readers and authors is a natural
evolution in the concept of the book and is one which many authors will push heavily for.
Some might like to
think we're at the pinnacle of
evolution; others might be inclined to
believe prehistoric humans were living
in a sort of Arcadia.
David Tenenbaum # 8 (Gee, when we have a bunch of candidates that don't seem to «
believe»
in evolution, who don't care what happens to the planet because they discount what science tells us about global warming, I can't
think a «science debate» is such a bad idea.)
Gee, when we have a bunch of candidates that don't seem to «
believe»
in evolution, who don't care what happens to the planet because they discount what science tells us about global warming, I can't
think a «science debate» is such a bad idea.
Prof. Hulme himself
believes that there is at least some man - made global warming, and
in the 1990s was a major advocate of urgent action (see here for his summary of the
evolution of his
thoughts on «climate change»).
I hear from liberals who claim to
believe in evolution but don't actually accept that a history of random variation and natural selection is of relevance
in thinking about human behavior: as with Scopes, the only part of
evolution they
believe is that it contradicts the Bible.
I don't
think that it is wrong to question the theory of
evolution by natural selection but that does not mean that I have to
believe in intelligent design.Whatever Roy Spencer
believes about
evolution (I don't know) it has nothing to do with his book.This just shows the quality of science today.