Sentences with phrase «believing in anything means»

Not exact matches

I'm just saying that if some scientists believe in one pholosophy, and disagree with others who believe in a different philosophy doesn't mean anything other than a difference in beliefs.
And honestly saying you believe in God and self - identify as Christian doesn't mean you actually Lean on God for anything so they say they're Christian but living as an Atheist.
Not believing in any of the gods we humans have created doesn't mean that atheists don't believe in anything.
Firstly, I believe that we can never hear too much teaching about what it really means to walk in love, and if there is anything that the Church worldwide is lacking, it is probably that genuinely walking in love with everybody.
Personally I don't care what people believe the bible says as long as they don; t get some insane idea (see lorriane) about how any of the sh!t in it means anything to me.
I mean, all the disciples in the Gospels followed Jesus for three years before they believed anything about the cross, or the death and resurrection of Jesus.
In Christian - speak «knowledge» has a very different meaning: it's code for anything they believe about God or the Bible.
Theists will sometimes say that ``... you're an atheist — that means you don't believe in ANYTHING
This is not to say, I hasten to add, that we do not believe in anything; I mean, rather, that we hold an unshakable, if often unconscious, faith in the nothing, or in nothingness as such.
Also I said I am not a religious person and that means I do not believe in any of this stuff but I am not going to say it is impossible because I think almost anything is possible so calling me a religious anything is about as empty an insult as anyone can toss my way, read before you insult, oh yes and make sure you retain what you read, that might help you a little.
- Well considering you are now cherry picking and not realizing that if you truely believe our «works don't save us» then what you've just told me is that as long as I have faith in god and christ I have carte blanche to go on a rampage and kill people, or be a di.ck, or anything else I want to do because my works on earth apparently mean nothing.
Why don't the people who have been blessed to believe in our creator Christians muslims and jews see the similarities between us Have you been so institutionalised as to only see what differences there are Will it mean anything on the last day
Christians are free to get together and pretend some god is paying attention to them, monitoring their thoughts and deeds, allocating them after they die to heaven, hell, limbo, purgatory or whatever other magic never - never lands they believe in and paying attention to their $ ex lives, but it must stop at the point where it actually means anything.
I mean this is you guy's logic, I'm not going to read the bible because it's not true and I don't believe anything in it and I'll show you that nothing is true in it by disproving what I think a book says even though I have never read it nor understand it.
For your small brain that must mean they believe in satan (because you fail to comprehend anything beyond yout christian reality bubble).
To believe in creationism today, however, is truly absurd, and shows that some people will believe in anything if they think it means they will live forever.
«And these signs will follow those who believe: in My name they will cast out demons; they will speak with new tongues; they will take up serpents; and if they drink anything deadly, it will by no means hurt them; they will lay their hands on the sick, and they will recover.»
Not sure i am convinced because how do you explain the verse an eye for an eye in the old testament there have always been consequences for wrong doing and stiill are for sin.If we believe the word then that word is from God not satan.As far as satan is concerned he uses violence as his tools of trade he works on our fears and is limited to robbing stealing and destroying he does nt have anything else.Violence confirms to us that there is a spiritual battle going on both on the earthly plane and in the heavenlys and the battle is over souls.The verse the kingdon of heaven is expanding and violent people take it by force is referring to that spiritual battle and as satan uses violence to expand his dominion so does God use violence to counter him.So what does he mean by that term for me i think it is saying that the the force of evil that satan uses or violence is overcome by a greater violence or force a more powerful one that being the Love of Christ.Through the cross we see that clearly portrayed and in our lives that very same battle is still happening right now for dominion be clear if we walk in the flkesh satan will have dominion over us but if we walk according to the spirit and abide in Christ we have freedom from our old nature.and satan.He can oppose us but he wont be able to influence us if we are in Christ.
And these signs will follow those who believe: In My name they will cast out demons; they will speak with new tongues; «they will take up serpents; and if they drink anything deadly, it will by no means hurt them; they will lay hands on the sick, and they will recover.»
Strings like, «There is something wrong with you if you don't speak in tongues» (a very unBiblical one that), you must have a full submersion baptism because the last baptism you had wasn't wet enough, you must sing naff choruses or it means you do nt» want to worship God, you must believe that the vast majority of people that have lived on earth are damned to everlasting Hell, you must not say anything controversial, you must not be too intellectually assertive if you're a woman, you must do as we say and believe as we say, you must force yourself to be attracted to people with a particular set of genitalia or be lonely and unfulfilled for the rest of your life.
Sorry, I don't believe that the term «atheist» means that they don't believe in anything.
Taking a stand against something means you believe in something therefore you can't be an atheist because atheists by definition do not believe in anything.
Im one of these spiritual people, and when I say that, I do nt mean I believe in God, only that I do nt know anything so I claim to never know I do.
That doesn't mean we don't believe in anything.
To me, meant if there was anything I didn't believe in Church dogma, than everything was wrong.
Taking the verse «And these signs will follow those who believe: in My name they will cast out demons; they will speak with new tongues; they will take up serpents; and if they drink anything deadly, it will by no means hurt them; they will lay their hands on the sick, and they will recover.»
Key to understanding this culture are a pair of verses from the Gospel of Mark in the New Testament: «And these signs will follow those who believe: in My name they will cast out demons; they will speak with new tongues; they will take up serpents; and if they drink anything deadly, it will by no means hurt them; they will lay their hands on the sick, and they will recover.»
I thought the motto was religious freedom which also means that people can choose any religious belief system, as well as not choose to believe in anything.
yet theyll use that as a means to not believe in anything remotely close to the concept of god.
@Chad Pata They won't believe anything that wasn't minted in a leather bound book with a bazillion pages in it, but that doesn't mean this artifact doesn't have historical significance.
The unfurnished mind, then, is the mind that tolerates but does not believe in anything that gives final meaning to personal or communal life.
- people believe the Savior is named «Jesus» and remain unsaved... - that Jesus» name really isn't «Jesus» He was never called «Jesus» in His life... - most people don't know the meaning of the name «Jesus»... - you say a person does not need to know ANYTHING about «Jesus» (e.g., that He is a man, that He is God, that He died for sins and rose again, that He isn't a Mexican somewhere in Tiajuana)-- other than that this guy is the guarantor of eternal life by faith alone... - you discount passages that say the lost are saved by the «preaching of the cross» (1Cor.
This message, however, does not mean, as it has often been interpreted, that the Judgment no longer means anything to him who believes in Christ, but rather that he alone survives the Judgment who has become a new man through faith in Christ, who has «passed from death to life» and hence belongs among those who «by patient continuance in well - doing seek for eternal life.»
If you believe that all the money in the game means that there will always be ways of bending and breaking the rules then I guess the FFP thing was never going to work and when you see what has happened this week in the transfer market, with PSG paying something like # 200 million to sign Neymar from FC Barcelona then you could say that anything is possible.
I can not believe anything good anymore i hope they prove me wrong in a big way, if we want i believe we can still keep Sanchez by buying top class players to show him and us that Arsenal means business and not by sniffing
Jose Mourinho doesn't believe Tottenham's home advantage will mean anything in tomorrow's FA Cup semi-final.
What a terrifying vision of the future of football we've been served up this week.AC Milan, once the pride of a powerful and thriving seria A now reduced to shadow boxing against a really not that great United.All because they deserted their natural (and rather beautiful) defensive style of football to join the circus, brought in foreign players (especially brazilians) who think jogging back to defend is beneath them and generally put two fingers up to Italy's historic football traditions.Much good as it done them, and what a boring game?I concede that a lot of football fans nowadays do nt remember anything before the cheque book league but even they must have been struck by the sheer mind numbing pointlessness of it.Even the stewards were asleep by half time.As for the porto match well all that can be said is that they made the gooners look like an half decent well balanced football team, no mean achievement when you think about it.At least we, ve had the pleasure of listening to all those gooners and Mancs waffling on about how great they are which is always hilarious.Especially the stuff about Rooney, just wait till the World Cup when some Italian or South American defender takes him under his wing for half an hour and then see how great he is.If he can survive the WC without being sent off it will be a miracle.All the recent hype has done him no favours at all.Not that the World Cup really inspires these days, its glory days are long over and it's become a competition decided by referees rather than great play.Bear that in mind if Roons has to take the walk of shame, it's not his fault, someone told him he was a truly great player like Bobby Charlton or George Best.The problem is he looks like he believes them.
He also believes that Barca and Real are most talked team in UEFA Champions league and also as the favourite but it does not mean that Juventus would not mean anything.
But when you have an idea that's worth believing in and you're willing to put your heart behind it all of that money doesn't mean anything.
That this House declines to give a Second Reading to the Welfare Benefits Up - rating Bill because it fails to address the reasons why the cost of benefits is exceeding the Government's plans; notes that the Resolution Foundation has calculated that 68 per cent of households affected by these measures are in work and that figures from the Institute for Fiscal Studies show that all the measures announced in the Autumn Statement, including those in the Bill, will mean a single - earner family with children on average will be # 534 worse off by 2015; further notes that the Bill does not include anything to remedy the deficiencies in the Government's work programme or the slipped timetable for universal credit; believes that a comprehensive plan to reduce the benefits bill must include measures to create economic growth and help the 129,400 adults over the age of 25 out of work for 24 months or more, but that the Bill does not do so; further believes that the Bill should introduce a compulsory jobs guarantee, which would give long - term unemployed adults a job they would have to take up or lose benefits, funded by limiting tax relief on pension contributions for people earning over # 150,000 to 20 per cent; and further believes that the proposals in the Bill are unfair when the additional rate of income tax is being reduced, which will result in those earning over a million pounds per year receiving an average tax cut of over # 100,000 a year.
To begin with my child has been diagnosed with PANS not autism which means that he is higher functioning and sometimes acts so normal you can't believe that anything is wrong and sometimes he acts in such a way you can't deny anything is wrong.
However, she points out a deeper meaning which reflects the importance of students feeling valued in the classroom: «When people believe they are important in a project, anything works, and, conversely, when they don't believe they are important, nothing works.»
Hi John - thank you again for your recent response to my earlier letter... I believe I read somewhere on the site that you are a retired engineer, so let me speak for a second in math terms... more of a hypothesis than anything empirical yet, but it SEEMS to me that the partial derivative of the «ideal» stock allocation (let's assume for now this means the equity allocation that maximizes the SWR) with respect to changes in PE10 is less sensitive to changes in PE10 the longer your time horizon and / or the higher your target terminal balance....
That's what faith and belief mean in the lingo of the Book, there is no demand to believe or have faith based on anything else, that I have seen anyway.
If I attempt to put myself in the position of a robot from Mars who doesn't know anything about the climate change debate except that it seems important to humans, I don't believe I could conclude that anyone was «taken to the cleaners» in this exchange (assuming a robot from Mars knows what that expression means:) I think I'd have to conclude that both participants were framing the issue in different ways and so there wasn't a meeting of minds, nor any change of the needle by either one on the attitudes of the other, nor likely much to help inform locals who were just as mystified by the debate as I was.
Relationship coach Kyle Benson says, «So many relationships turn their hot and passionate fire of love into ashes, just because the couple believes that being in love means never having to do anything demanding.
For instance, in Buffalo, if you own a multifamily (anything 2 or more units, I believe,) you need a local property manager whose number is on file with the code Dept. Local for them means within a 15 - 30 minute drive to the property, or something to that effect.
Tattling was always a pet peeve of mine and, whenver one of mine would come to me witha complaint that someone had hit, or grabbed, etc., I learned to say, «What happened just before he / she hit, grabbed, etc.» I believe anything parents can do to foster a positive self - image (that means private, not public, discipline, even if it means a quick walk to a restroom or back to the car), and to encourage mutual respect (allowing a child to express how he / she feels about the discipline being meted out by the parent, and giving an age - appropriate child a say - so in the discipline) will not only benefit the child, but will benefit all those who encounter that child during his / her lifetime.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z