CFACT's position
on climate change is CO2 is «
beneficial» to plants and wildlife and therefore, «Regulating carbon dioxide may be profitable for certain industries and governments, but will impose enormous costs
on society — while having no
effect on our
weather and climate.»
A physicist is no more likely than a sociologist to know what human emissions will be 50 years from now — if a slight warming would be
beneficial or harmful to humans or the natural world; if forcings and feedbacks will partly or completely offset the theoretical warming; if natural variability will exceed any discernible human
effect; if secondary
effects on weather will lead to more extreme or more mild
weather events; if efforts to reduce emissions will be successful; who should reduce emissions, by what amounts, or when; and whether the costs of attempting to reduce emissions will exceed the benefits by an amount so large as to render the effort counterproductive.