This system is made to
benefit BIG publishers and big indie authors that are already making a killing.
Yet just as high street booksellers blanched at the rise of the e-book (and consequent shrinking of their bestseller market and creeping dominance by Amazon), so academic bookshops are right to be wary of how digital inevitably
benefits the bigger publishers over smaller campus bookstores.
Not exact matches
My concerns notwithstanding, I respect Amazon's passion for innovation (and I truly, truly approved of the Department of Justice's antitrust suit against the
biggest publishers, whether or not Amazon
benefited; the law is the law).
But of course, since traditional
publishers only pay attention to their
big blockbuster writers and leave newbies to do their own marketing, one might as well go ahead on one's own and reap the (70 % royalty)
benefits instead of the standard 8 % on nothing once «costs» have been paid...
I'm not a
big fan of reading manga / comics digitally but I really want to see it succeed to the
benefit of readers, creators and
publishers alike.
The
biggest issue with self - publishing is that you don't have a
publisher making decisions for you — the
benefit is that you don't have a
publisher forcing their decisions on you.
I feel right now I've found a happy medium with higher royalties than the
big six authors, but some of the
benefits they have (although not all)-- I signed with a
big independent
publisher, however I wouldn't rule out either of the other two options in future.
That is quite a few less than a traditional
publisher, BUT (and this is a
big one) there are some MAJOR
benefits Amazon works in compared to a traditional
publisher.
I also suspect that the fog of war that currently shrouds the marketplace probably
benefits self -
publishers more than the
big publishers.
A time - limited clause would let the
publisher gain their profit from the
biggest sales period of the book, right after the release, and yet let the author
benefit from more favorable royalty rates off the long - tail sales if they re-release the book themselves after the rights reversion.
«The
benefit of #ProjectReadathon is that the simple act of reading can have far - reaching social impact: the more participants read, the
bigger contribution they can make,» the
publisher announced in a press release.
Sales for a small tier of mega-bestsellers like Patterson, King, Evanovich, Roberts, etc. skew toward brick & mortar print and away from ebooks and online because of the broad brick - and - mortar visibility you mention in airports, supermarkets, etc., and especially because of paid co-op placement in bookstores, which they
benefit from disproportionately (Because
publishers concentrate marketing spend disproportionately in their
biggest - name tentpole authors).
The industry also
benefits as a whole from the extra attention it receives due to the promotion of its authors and the presence of the
publishers at the
biggest book fair in the world.
There are some books that would
benefit from the expertise and experience of a traditional
publisher, just like some movies need the resources of a
big studio to make the project come to life.
I'm thinking — if you really are going to query
publishers for the above
benefits, it might help you more if you went through a
publisher who gets you good distribution and a decent advance and no funny business in the contract (a
Big 5, if you can swing it... and do watch that contract.
Unless her agent got a cut she very much capitalized on the
benefits of self - publishing for that project, which I loved... The
biggest threat to traditional publishing are traditional
publishers... If a gate is slammed in my face, is it my responsibility to come back and paint it when I've found another gate, or built myself a ladder?
The
publishers noted that while they continue to sell e-books under the wholesale model, they have «
benefitted significantly» — along with authors, booksellers and consumers, — from the ability of the
Big Six
publishers to adopt the agency pricing model with Amazon, since those arrangements, «contributed dramatically to increased competition and diversification in the distribution of e-books.»
Which, of course, is why the entire Establishment —
Big Publishers, bookstores, agents,
Big Name Authors, distributors, major periodicals (which
benefit from
publisher advertising), et al. — have aligned themselves loudly against Amazon.
When I write that the traditional book publishing industry sometimes «appears to be operated by 5
big traditional book
publishers in New York for their sole
benefit, the rest of the industry be damned» I thought it would be clear that I not in the stands cheering for that side of the industry.
That's why I laugh at the notion of comics needing the
Big Two because if folks would've been more alert to the game being played sooner than people have finally started to, they'd have enjoyed the
benefits of a healthy
publisher / creator relationship like writers do and should and Marvel / DC would've started the slide into their current malaise / drek a lot sooner than the last few years.
Successful self - published authors like Howey, who did well by ultimately selling print rights to a
Big 5
publisher while retaining digital rights, are less likely to see any
benefit in prestige or marketing when there is diminished gain from a rapidly diminishing retail presence.
The filing says that
big - six
publishers, through their contracts with Amazon that allow for Amazon's proprietary DRM on their ebooks, «unreasonably restrain trade and commerce in the market for ebooks» in violation of the Sherman Act,» and claims «consumers have been injured because they have been deprived of choice and also denied the
benefits of innovation and competition resulting from the foreclosure of independent brick - and - mortar bookstores.»
And if
big publishing houses allow these companies to get a foothold — which is already happening — authors won't see the
benefit of going through a larger
publisher.
While this is likely a negative development for readers, indie - authors are likely positioned to
benefit from higher average ebook prices (especially when this average is skewed by titles coming from
Big Five
publishers).
This not only shows the
big six
publishers are not pricing their ebooks too high, but the low prices are actually
benefiting the sales of the ebooks.
But I do feel we are all missing on the
benefits to be derived from the
Big Five or small, respected legacy presses, if we don't realize that the legacy
publishers offer something more than a contract and royalties: they offer a chance to be reviewed by independent professional critics in the mainstream media and to access all the prestigious prizes — and this should be also said loud and clear and I hope you dedicate a future post to this.