These cases have been pre-screened by a staff attorney based on a determination that briefing and argument by counsel would
benefit appellate review and assist with the fair and efficient administration of justice.
Not exact matches
First, on the strict matter of
appellate jurisdiction, the Court of Appeals said yes, it had such jurisdiction and in terms of the standard of
review, «A district court decides a motion to compel arbitration under the same standard it applies to a motion for summary judgment» and that «the party opposing arbitration is given the
benefit of all reasonable doubts and inferences that may arise.»
As I have noted before, the fact that Gall seemed to loosen the stardards for
appellate review of variances will not always
benefit defendants.
The other examples provided by commenters, such as arranging, conducting, or assistance with primary and
appellate level
review of enrollee coverage appeals, also fall within the scope of adjudication of health
benefits claims.