Not exact matches
(6) Regardless of the terms of any agreement
evidencing an Incentive Award, the Committee shall have the right to substitute stock appreciation rights
for outstanding Options granted to any Participant, provided the substituted stock appreciation rights
call for settlement by the issuance of shares of Common Stock, and the terms of the substituted stock appreciation rights and economic
benefit of such substituted stock appreciation rights are at least equivalent to the terms and economic
benefit of the Options being replaced.
Evidence and testimony showed how some lawmakers can wield their considerable power to extort
benefits for themselves or others; how the weak enforcement of lax financial disclosure requirements gives legislators ample opportunity to mask illegal payments as outside income; how moneyed real estate interests spend millions of dollars in campaign contributions to influence legislation; and how power is concentrated in the hands of the so -
called three men in a room: the legislative leaders and the governor.
Iain Duncan Smith said Raquel Rolnik had undermined the impartiality of the UN with her «outrageous»
call for his housing
benefit shake - up to be axed... Tory MP Stewart Jackson said Miss Rolnick was a «loopy Brazilian leftie with no
evidence masquerading as a serious UN official».»
Accordingly Ulrich Trautwein, director of the Hector Research Institute of Education Sciences and Psychology,
calls for a better integration of research and practice: «Our study is further
evidence of how school practice might
benefit from the insights of education sciences.»
Yet, until now, the UK's National Institute
for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has said there is insufficient
evidence to recommend behavioural activation as a first - line treatment in clinical guidelines, and has
called for more robust research to investigate the
benefits.
Essentially, my point is that saying something is totally a hoax when some
benefits could be present is just
called unsound
evidence or irreverent
evidence for that matter, in regards to the true topic at hand, being... (after reading this whole thing I'm not sure it's what it began as, got a bit convoluted...?)
«With
evidence about the
benefits for children and young people of teaching [sex and relationships education] stacked up high and a growing list of politicians
calling for the subject to be mandatory, there is no excuse
for government to continue leaving [sex and relationships education] to chance.»
Given the known
benefits of sterilization and the lack of
evidence for harm related to age at which the procedure is performed, the Veterinary Taskforce on Feline Sterilization
calls for veterinary practitioners and professional associations to recommend sterilization of cats by five months of age.
Let me lay out a further deduction
for you «experts» who continue to thoughtlessly dismiss the definitive
evidence, which is required to correct and advance climate science from this point on, and
for the
benefit of interested laypersons (and the all - capitals doesn't imply yelling, just what I have learned is a necessary emphasis, to get you to focus upon the facts — YOU ARE INCREDIBLY STUPID, ALL OF YOU, AND YOU DO NOT DESERVE TO
CALL YOURSELVES, OR BE EMPLOYED AS, SCIENTISTS, MUCH LESS EXPERTS.
In this context, the Commission
called for comments on the «potential
benefits and risks associated with ABS,» as well as «
evidence or other input» on the relative advantages and disadvantages of different types of ABS (
for example, with limits on the percentage of nonlawyer ownership and / or multidisciplinary practices).