The Trump administration, however, attempted to alter that trajectory with a number of actions in its first year, including rolling back EPA regulations on carbon, methane and other pollutants, as well as pushing wholesale market reforms to
benefit coal and nuclear.
Not exact matches
Secretary Perry's attempts to tip the scale in favor of uneconomic
coal and nuclear power plants to provide a «resilience»
benefit that doesn't exist would have increased carbon emissions, raised costs to consumers,
and distorted competitive markets.»
I promoted Keith Kloor «s post on the paucity of coverage of a new peer - reviewed study on the health
benefits of
nuclear power (compared to
coal), co-authored by James Hansen, who retired yesterday after 46 years of planetary
and climate science at NASA:
Clinton is right — we desperately need to begin the less - than - sexy work of revamping our infrastructure
and doing the cost -
benefit analysis that will pave the way for well - thought out projects in solar
and wind, conservation,
and even
nuclear and improved efficiency at
coal plants needs to be on the table.
Nuclear power would provide many other
benefits as well: energy security, reliable energy supply, reduce shipping costs
and energy used in shipping
coal by a factor of 20,000 to 2 million, provide fresh water, no need for carbon pricing, avoid 1 million fatalities per year by 2050,... https://judithcurry.com/2012/08/17/learning-from-the-octopus/#comment-231867.
Natural gas
and coal generators are currently suing New York over the ZEC program
and its
benefits to New York's
nuclear program, which are estimated to cost ratepayers 3.2 cents / kWh.
The
benefit of
nuclear energy is even greater if we consider the case where electrification is advancing across the developing world
and replaces
coal, wood, dung, etc for heat
and cooking.
He also covers
coal, oil, natural gas,
nuclear gas,
and renewable energy policy
and articulates the
benefits of free market environmentalism.
While there were several estimates of the
coal and nuclear plant subsidies that the policy would require, RFF researchers produced the only comprehensive
benefit - cost analysis.
Benefits to the climate are about equal in switching from
coal to natural gas,
and from natural gas to
nuclear, but most of the co-
benefits occur with the switch away from
coal.
«There is no power source that doesn't
benefit from federal
and state incentives, so it's highly unlikely that
coal and nuclear are becoming uncompetitive due to incentives for renewable energy,» said Abigail Ross Hopper, the president
and chief executive of the Solar Energy Industries Association.