«We had seen such a rampant abuse of science under George W. Bush,» Halpern says, singling out Bush's efforts to sidestep endangered species protections to
benefit fossil fuel development.
Not exact matches
(Those of us who
benefitted from decades of cheap
fossil fuels can do our part by supporting boosted federal investments in clean - energy science and technology
development — and, yes, deployment.)
d. Changing perceptions of the risks and
benefits of nuclear power leads to increasing public support for nuclear > allows the NRC licensing process to be completely revamped and the culture of the organisation to be changed from «safety first» to an appropriate balance of all costs and risks, including the consequences of retarding nuclear
development and rollout by making it too expensive to compete as well as it could if the costs were lower (e.g. higher fatalities per TWh if nuclear is not allowed to be cheaper than
fossil fuels);
CDR helps enable a cost - effective transition to a decarbonized economy: Today, environmental advocates claim that prolonged use of
fossil fuels is mutually exclusive with preventing climate change, and
fossil fuel advocates bash renewables as not ready for «prime time» — i.e. unable to deliver the economic /
development benefits of inexpensive
fossil energy.
By contrast, despite spending over $ 2 trillion in 5 decades, aid programs have much less to show in terms of poverty reduction — or its ancillary
benefits, e.g., reductions in hunger, disease, better health care and education, and greater adaptive capacity to deal with climate change and natural disasters — than does
fossil fuel - powered economic
development.
Weighing the social and economic
benefits of
fossil fuel consumption and other human activities against some of the environmental consequences, he asked «[i] s it now necessary, for the long - term future of our planet, to limit such
development?»
Air pollution
benefits aside, these so - called «coal bases» are the largest
fossil fuel development in the world.
Restricting R&D to «green'technology could conceivably carry the consequence of precluding such
developments which would make
fossil fuels more abundant and less expensive, thereby denying those who would
benefit from it the advantages of any new technology.