Not exact matches
The U.S. government should maintain its leadership position in
global health as a matter of urgent national interest and as a
global public benefit that enhances America's international standing.»
Joanna Cohen, a co-author of the Google study and director of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of
Public Health Institute for
Global Tobacco Control, believes «campaigns for people to quit may
benefit from shifting to weekly cues to increase the number of quit attempts participants make each year.»
It dramatically reduces
global warming emissions, improves
public health, and provides jobs and other economic
benefits.
What the EPA does not communicate clearly to the
public, however, is that none of these
health benefits come from decreasing carbon dioxide emissions to avoid
global warming, but from coincidental
benefits (or «co-
benefits») from reducing other air pollutants which the EPA already heavily regulates.
We support educating the
public and policymakers in government and industry about the harmful human
health effects of
global climate change, and about the immediate and long - term
health benefits associated with reducing greenhouse gas emissions (i.e., heat - trapping pollution) and taking other preventive and protective measures that contribute to sustainability.
Increasingly, in complex
public health evaluation research, there are questions about whether all relevant
benefits can be captured in a single summary outcome measure such as QALY or unit of «effectiveness» or net
benefit approach17 which is why the use of a cost - consequence analysis (CCA) framework is being recommended for such economic evaluations.18 Other outcomes from the trial such as the Parent — Infant Relationship
Global Assessment Scale (an observational measure that is independently rated blind to group allocation) will be included in the CCA so that all costs and outcomes from the trial can be displayed transparently for decision - makers to consider trade - offs themselves.