Not exact matches
There are particular questions here about the fate of
union workers whose pay and
benefits are set by multi-year collective bargaining agreements and
public sector
workers whose pay is set by law.
With a slim majority of all
union workers employed in the
public sector, the conservative class war amounts to dragging unionized
public employees down to the level of contingent no -
benefits workers before they can leverage their power to help private sector
workers raise their own workplace standards.
«It will help us because the people against the convention are generally our people — the
public sector
unions like teachers, government
workers and police» concerned the recent «radical wave could sweep a convention» and diminish or erase pension and health
benefits, Schaffer said.
Public employee
unions were angry with the governor for reducing pensions
benefits for new
workers, and teachers were upset over a property tax cap, which impacts school budgets, and test - based evaluations.
-- Includes language to pre-emptively respond to a looming Supreme Court decision that most observers expect will weaken
public employee
unions by letting state
workers decline to pay dues even if they
benefit from the
union's efforts.
The state's two largest
public workers union, the Civil Service Employees Association, and the Public Employees Federation, say even without the 401k option, Cuomo's proposed Tier VI benefit plan is too meager, and unaccep
public workers union, the Civil Service Employees Association, and the
Public Employees Federation, say even without the 401k option, Cuomo's proposed Tier VI benefit plan is too meager, and unaccep
Public Employees Federation, say even without the 401k option, Cuomo's proposed Tier VI
benefit plan is too meager, and unacceptable.
But the
unions are not in a mood to cede further ground, after failing this year to block legislation that reduced pension
benefits for future
public workers.
Mayor Bloomberg is proposing to replace JTPs with WEP
workers, which would force people on
public assistance to work for their
benefits without a pay check, without paying into social security, no
union membership, and no qualifying for earned income tax credit.
Faced with devastating budget cuts from Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo and a deeply hostile electorate, New York's most influential
public - employee
unions have unexpectedly shifted their strategy for defending cherished government programs and
worker benefits.
The IDC warned the convention could do «tremendous damage» from repealing constitutionally protected pensions for
public workers and repealing prevailing wage laws that require even nonunion contractors with the state to pay
union wages and
benefits.
Public sector
unions can breathe a sigh of relief after last month's state Supreme Court ruling: an Illinois pension reform law that would have cut
benefits for existing
workers was declared unconstitutional.
A group of active and retired Chicago city employees and four
unions that represent them — AFSCME Council 31, the Chicago Teachers
Union, the Illinois Nurses Associations and Teamsters Local 700 — filed suit today in Cook County Circuit Court to overturn Senate Bill 1922 (
Public Act 98 - 0641), legislation to sharply reduce pension
benefits for city
workers and retirees who participate in the Municipal Employees Annuity and
Benefit Fund (MEABF).
The new state law, held up pending a legal challenge, forbids most
public worker unions from negotiating salary schedules,
benefits and workplace rules with employers.
He argued that with the anticipated Supreme Court ruling on Janus v. AFSCME, which will likely allow
public sector
workers to receive
union representation and
benefits without paying
union dues, it is crucial to remain «united.»
To balance the state's budget, Gov. Walker took on powerful
public sector
unions, reining in their collective bargaining privileges and requiring that
public - sector
workers start to contribute toward their retirement and health care
benefits.
Public employee
unions maintain retirement
benefits far larger than those received by most private sector
workers (and taxpayers).
Although it is relatively unknown in Ontario, litigation insurance is well established in Quebec due to marketing by Le Barreau du Québec, which spends $ 125,000 / year on
public information campaigns that have led to coverage for 250,000 Quebec families.1 Some unionized
workers, notably from Canadian Auto Workers and Power Workers Union, also benefit from coverage built into their union cont
workers, notably from Canadian Auto
Workers and Power Workers Union, also benefit from coverage built into their union cont
Workers and Power
Workers Union, also benefit from coverage built into their union cont
Workers Union, also benefit from coverage built into their union contra
Union, also
benefit from coverage built into their
union contra
union contracts.2