25.1 governing agreements to settle claims and disputes in respect of statutory accident
benefits under Part VI;
(c) if the insured person is eligible to receive and has elected under section 35 to receive either an income replacement benefit or a caregiver
benefit under this Part.
(c) any income replacement, non-earner or caregiver
benefit under Part II or any
benefit under Part IV, to the extent of any payments received by the person that are deductible under this Regulation from the amount of the benefit.
(1) If a person is entitled to a death benefit, a funeral benefit or
a benefit under Part IV, the insurer shall pay the benefit within 30 days after the insurer receives an application for the benefit.
25.2 governing the assignment of statutory accident
benefits under Part VI, including the application of sections 279 to 282 to persons to whom the benefits are assigned;
This ICBC injury insurance Appeal case concerned the nature of the claim for injury
benefits under Part 7 of the Insurance Regulations and the interpretation of s. 96 (f) of the Regulation when a claimant has a pre-existing condition.
(c) any income replacement, non-earner or caregiver benefit or
any benefit under Part VI, to the extent of any payments received by the person that are deductible from those benefits under this Regulation;
(2) Payment of a medical, rehabilitation or attendant care benefit or
a benefit under Part VI is not required for that portion of an expense for which payment is reasonably available to the insured person under any insurance plan or law or under any other plan or law.
(d) if the insured person is eligible to receive and has elected under section 35 to receive either an income replacement benefit or a caregiver
benefit under this Part.
«(i) pursuant to subsection (a) or (d) of section 437 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 or the parallel
benefit under part D of title IV of such Act (relating to the repayment of loan liability),
Benefits described in Section 39 (1) of the Social Welfare Consolidation Act 2005 (as amended) are as follows: Illness Benefit; Partial Capacity Benefit; Maternity Benefit; Health and Safety Benefit; Adoptive Benefit; Jobseeker's Benefit; Occupational Injuries Benefit comprising injury benefit, disablement benefit and death benefit; Carer's Benefit; State Pension Contributory; State Pension Transition; Invalidity Pension; Widow's, Widower's, Surviving Civil Partner's Contributory Pension; Guardian's Payment Contributory; Bereavement Grant; Widowed or Surviving Civil Partner Grant paid by virtue of receipt of
a benefit under Part 2 Treatment Benefit under Section 138 of the above Act;
Not exact matches
Large employers who combine the
benefits under one insurer have begun to demand insurers hit a specific dollar figure of medical cost savings per member, per year, said David Dross, national pharmacy practice leader at Mercer,
part of Marsh & McLennan.
Many receive
benefits provided
under Medicaid, including the State Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), as well as Aged, Blind or Disabled (ABD), Foster Care and Long - Term Services and Supports (LTSS), in addition to other state - sponsored programs, Medicare (including the Medicare prescription drug
benefit commonly known as «
Part D»), dual eligible programs and programs with the U.S. Department of Defense and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
It's a more complicated argument, but the flip side is that employees may not want to work full - time hours anyway because,
under the economics of Obamacare, they can bring home the same amount of money working
part time as they did full time — and still get
benefits.
While
parts of Trump's agenda could
benefit Under Armour, other policies from his platform could outweigh the positives.
Currently, insurance plans need to meet minimum standards and cover essential
benefits as
part of their plans
under the Affordable Care Act.
What's more, common law property rights here in the U.S.
benefit mining companies in ways that simply can't be found in Latin America and other
parts of the world that operate
under civil law.
* For current executives it is way to give more to employees in a way that can
benefit themselves at the expense of future executives and shareholders, by capitalizing
part of wages into a «book» liability that can be
under - depreciated by current executives to the
benefit of their bonuses.
Many receive
benefits provided
under Medicaid, including the State Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), as well as Aged, Blind or Disabled (ABD), Foster Care and Long - Term Services (LTSS), in addition to other state - sponsored programs, Medicare (including the Medicare prescription drug
benefit commonly known as «
Part D»), dual eligible programs and programs with the U.S. Department of Defense and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
Enacted in 2003 as
part of legislation providing drug
benefits under Medicare, the tax preference is only available if the individual purchases a high - deductible health insurance policy.
This press release does not constitute or form a
part of any offer or solicitation to purchase or subscribe for securities in the United States, and interests in the Fund will not be offered or sold in the United States or to, or for the account or
benefit of, any U.S. person (as such term is defined in Regulation S
under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933).
Under generally - accepted accounting principles, the WITB should be included as
part of program expenses (like the Canada Child Tax
Benefit) rather than being netted against personal income tax revenues.
Proposed by one of the teachers, Jörg Holler, the project was supported by ProVeg Deutschland (formerly VEBU, German's Vegetarian Association) and the health insurance company BKK ProVita,
under the aegis of their Pflanzenpower — Plant Power — campaign,
part of an effort to help children understand the
benefits of meat free eating.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense
under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter
part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all
part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large
part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't
under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the
benefits
They have long formed
part of the
benefit system in various guises, with tens of thousands of sanctions handed out
under the last Labour government as unemployment rose amid the financial crisis.
The maximum amount that a party may be paid in donations made to the Electoral Commission for the
benefit of that party during a specified period is 10 % (excluding any interest paid
under section 208E (2)-RRB- of the maximum amount of election expenses allowed
under section 206C (1) to be incurred by a party that is listed in the
part of the ballot paper that relates to the party vote and that has a candidate contesting every electoral district.
While the US routinely funds human rights abusers, although the law allows it if there are greater
benefits than risks, which is sometimes interpreted as an open license, I can find only one example of the US ever breaking this
part of the law, and it is currently
under consideration of cutting off aid to them (Porfirio Lobo in Honduras).
«Every
part of the UK should be reaping the
benefits of economic growth, yet
under Labour the Welsh economy is lagging behind the rest of the UK.
Labour will invest in skills and jobs, and take action to enforce a floor
under employment standards across the board — so that all jobs are decent jobs, so that all workers — the true wealth creators - can play their
part in transforming Britain and
benefit fully from it.
(CNN)- Sen. Patty Murray, co-crafter of the bipartisan budget agreement and member of the veterans affair committee, said Wednesday cuts to pension
benefits for some military veterans
under the spending plan was a
part of a compromise to avoid billions in cuts to the defense industry.
Not all
parts of the state have
benefited equally from the
under - the - radar bond spending.
Extended the Power for Jobs program and the «energy cost savings
benefit program» through the end of 2007; allows all PfJ participants to elect to begin receiving
benefits through the savings reimbursement option, rather than a contract continuation; PfJ participants with contract extensions are eligible for a rebate of any excess costs (PfJ rates compared to rates available through their local utility) incurred after January 1, 2006
under their PfJ contracts (
Part U).
-- The Secretary shall publish notice of the
benefits available
under this
part to workers covered by each certification made
under subsection (d) in newspapers of general circulation in the areas in which such workers reside and shall make such information available on the website of the Department of Labor.
They examined the impact of high specialty drug cost sharing
under the Medicare
Part D prescription drug
benefit on patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).
-- The Secretary shall provide written notice through the mail of the
benefits available
under this
part to each worker whom the Secretary has reason to believe is covered by a certification made
under subsection (d)--
-- The Secretary shall provide full information to workers about the adjustment allowances, training, and other
benefits available
under this
part and about the petition and application procedures, and the appropriate filing dates, for such allowances, training and services.
Among other things, we plan to include certain gene therapy products that permanently alter tissue and produce a sustained therapeutic
benefit as
part of the products that will meet the definition of being eligible to come
under the pathway enabled by RMAT.
Film Editors Spencer Averick — «13th,» «Selma» Alexandre de Franceschi — «Lion,» «Bright Star» Keiko Deguchi * — «God Knows Where I Am,» «Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus» Tracy Granger — «Still Life,» «Boys Don't Cry» Sabine Hoffman — «Maggie's Plan,» «Elvis & Nixon» Edie Ichioka — «The Boxtrolls,» «Toy Story 2» Janus Billeskov Jansen * — «The Hunt,» «The Act of Killing» Céline Kélépikis — «The Red Turtle,» «Now or Never» Melissa Kent — «American Pastoral,» «The Age of Adaline» Juan Carlos Macías — «Wild Horses,» «The Official Story» Jim May — «Goosebumps,» «The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe» Fredrik Morheden — «A Man Called Ove,» «The New Country» Christopher Murrie * — «Kubo and the Two Strings,» «Coraline» Tania Michel Nehme — «Tanna,» «Charlie's Country» Tia Nolan — «Annie,» «Friends with
Benefits» Anne Østerud — «The Hunt,» «The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo» Gregory Perler — «Sing,» «Despicable Me» Jacopo Quadri — «Fire at Sea,» «The Dreamers» Fabienne Rawley — «Zootopia,» «MonsterHouse» Jake Roberts — «Hell or High Water,» «Brooklyn» Hayedeh Safiyari — «The Salesman,» «A Separation» Nat Sanders — «Moonlight,» «Short Term 12» Per Sandholt — «Land of Mine,» «A Funny Man» Suzanne Spangler — «Imperial Dreams,» «Smashed» Molly Malene Stensgaard — «Land of Mine,» «Melancholia» Alexandra Strauss — «I Am Not Your Negro,» «A Pigeon Sat on a Branch Reflecting on Existence» Christian Wagner — «The Fate of the Furious,» «Furious Seven» Monika Willi — «Amour,» «The Piano Teacher» Kate Williams — «The Whole Truth,» «Frozen River» Dan Zimmerman — «The Dark Tower,» «The Maze Runner» Lucia Zucchetti — «Their Finest,» «The Queen» Eric Zumbrunnen — «Her,» «Adaptation» Makeup Artists and Hairstylists Richard Alonzo — «Star Trek Beyond,» «Alice in Wonderland» Alessandro Bertolazzi — «Suicide Squad,» «Fury» Christine Beveridge — «The Monuments Men,» «
Under the Skin» Felicity Bowring — «Gold,» «Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy» Jerry DeCarlo — «Carol,» «Julie & Julia» Patricia DeHaney — «Sully,» «Interstellar» Naomi Donne — «Cinderella,» «Philomena» Linda Dowds — «RoboCop,» «Rampart» Audrey Doyle — «Legend,» «Mad Max: Fury Road» Tina Earnshaw — «The Promise,» «Titanic» Rick Findlater — «L'Odyssée (The Odyssey),» «The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey» Paul Gooch — «Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children,» «Maleficent» Fae Hammond — «Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them,» «The Legend of Tarzan» Miia Kovero — «Inherent Vice,» «The Master» Michael Marino — «American Pastoral,» «The Wrestler» Frances Mathias — «Saving Mr. Banks,» «Beginners» Christopher Nelson — «Suicide Squad,» «Frank Miller's Sin City» Elaine Offers — «The Kids Are All Right,» «Far from Heaven» Conor O'Sullivan — «The Dark Knight,» «Saving Private Ryan» Daniel Phillips — «Florence Foster Jenkins,» «The Queen» Luigi Rocchetti — «Ben - Hur,» «The Nativity Story» Morag Ross — «Hugo,» «The Aviator» Nikoletta Skarlatos — «Free State of Jones,» «The Hunger Games: Mockingjay (
Parts 1 & 2)» Vittorio Sodano — «Il Divo,» «Apocalypto» Shane Thomas — «The Dressmaker,» «Hacksaw Ridge» Kenneth Walker — «Loving,» «For Colored Girls» Kerry Warn — «The Great Gatsby,» «Australia» Carla White — «Hands of Stone,» «August: Osage County» Ann Pala Williams — «Live by Night,» «Click» Jeremy Woodhead — «Doctor Strange,» «Snowpiercer»
Under that provision, such
benefits as life - insurance annuities and paid health - care plans will become taxable in January if they are found to be
part of a program that discriminates against lower - paid workers.
She also encouraged states to use this opportunity
under Title IV,
Part A, to provide a «well - rounded education» for young students, noting that early elementary grades tend to focus on literacy skills such as letter and word identification, while dual language learners — as well as all young children — would
benefit from increased attention to building comprehension, vocabulary, and background knowledge.
Recent Webinars by IDRA and Our Partners January 10, 2018 — Integrated Schooling — Strategies and
Benefits for Diverse Learning December 5, 2017 — Cultivating Equity - oriented Educators — What SEAs Can do to Promote Culturally Responsive and Sustaining Practices at the LEA Level — Webinar Series
Part II November 15, 2017 — Culturally Responsive Pedagogy — An Effective Tool in Systemic School Transformation
under ESSA — Webinar Series
Part I November 8, 2017 — Diversifying the Teaching Field — Challenges and Opportunities September 20, 2017 — Ensuring a Safe and Inclusive School Environment for LGBTQ Students August 24, 2017 — How to Comment on the Texas ESSA Plan
In certain circumstances, a failure to ensure that LEP persons can effectively participate in or
benefit from federally assisted programs and activities may violate the prohibition against national origin discrimination
under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d) and the U.S. Department of Transportation's (DOT) Title VI regulations at 49 CFR
Part 21.
49 USC 306, Federal - Aid Highway Act A person in the United States may not be excluded from participating in, be denied the
benefits of, or be subject to discrimination
under, a project, program, or activity because of race, color, national origin, or sex when any
part of the project, program, or activity is financed through financial assistance
under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973 or Title V of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976.
(9) For any service agent, maintaining a relationship with another party that constitutes a conflict of interest
under this
part (e.g., a laboratory that derives a financial
benefit from having an employer use a specific MRO);
49 CFR
Part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally - Assisted Programs of Department of Transportation: Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 No person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the
benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination
under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department of Transportation.
The Federal Transit Laws, 49 U.S.C. 5332 (b), provide that «no person in the United States shall on the grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or age be excluded from the participation in, be denied the
benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination
under any project, program or activity funded in whole or in
part through financial assistance
under this Act.»
The offical Volkswagen Drive Easy Gold plan includes (commonly referred to as vw extended warranty) coverage provided
under the Powertrain and Silver Plan, with the additional
benefits like ABS component
parts, 30 plus additional electrical components, oil pan, water pump pulley and much more.
I have not checked to see if Vantage or their sister companies have filed (they would presumably file in a federal district for their area in Great Barrington, Mass.) A bankruptcy attorney in that area could better answer your question about those publishing contracts as bankruptcy estate assets that a Trustee would «recall» (or «garner for the bankruptcy estate)
under a preference rule and make a
part of Vantage's «bankruptcy estate» for the
benefit of creditors.
Such statements reflect the current views of Barnes & Noble with respect to future events, the outcome of which is subject to certain risks, including, among others, the general economic environment and consumer spending patterns, decreased consumer demand for Barnes & Noble's products, low growth or declining sales and net income due to various factors, possible disruptions in Barnes & Noble's computer systems, telephone systems or supply chain, possible risks associated with data privacy, information security and intellectual property, possible work stoppages or increases in labor costs, possible increases in shipping rates or interruptions in shipping service, effects of competition, possible risks that inventory in channels of distribution may be larger than able to be sold, possible risks associated with changes in the strategic direction of the device business, including possible reduction in sales of content, accessories and other merchandise and other adverse financial impacts, possible risk that component
parts will be rendered obsolete or otherwise not be able to be effectively utilized in devices to be sold, possible risk that financial and operational forecasts and projections are not achieved, possible risk that returns from consumers or channels of distribution may be greater than estimated, the risk that digital sales growth is less than expectations and the risk that it does not exceed the rate of investment spend, higher - than - anticipated store closing or relocation costs, higher interest rates, the performance of Barnes & Noble's online, digital and other initiatives, the success of Barnes & Noble's strategic investments, unanticipated increases in merchandise, component or occupancy costs, unanticipated adverse litigation results or effects, product and component shortages, the potential adverse impact on the Company's businesses resulting from the Company's prior reviews of strategic alternatives and the potential separation of the Company's businesses, the risk that the transactions with Microsoft and Pearson do not achieve the expected
benefits for the parties or impose costs on the Company in excess of what the Company anticipates, including the risk that NOOK Media's applications are not commercially successful or that the expected distribution of those applications is not achieved, risks associated with the international expansion contemplated by the relationship with Microsoft, including that it is not successful or is delayed, the risk that NOOK Media is not able to perform its obligations
under the Microsoft and Pearson commercial agreements and the consequences thereof, risks associated with the restatement contained in, the delayed filing of, and the material weakness in internal controls described in Barnes & Noble's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended April 27, 2013, risks associated with the SEC investigation disclosed in the quarterly report on Form 10 - Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 26, 2013, risks associated with the ongoing efforts to rationalize the NOOK business and the expected costs and
benefits of such efforts and associated risks and other factors which may be outside of Barnes & Noble's control, including those factors discussed in detail in Item 1A, «Risk Factors,» in Barnes & Noble's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended April 27, 2013, and in Barnes & Noble's other filings made hereafter from time to time with the SEC.
Such statements reflect the current views of Barnes & Noble with respect to future events, the outcome of which is subject to certain risks, including, among others, the effect of the proposed separation of NOOK Media, the general economic environment and consumer spending patterns, decreased consumer demand for Barnes & Noble's products, low growth or declining sales and net income due to various factors, possible disruptions in Barnes & Noble's computer systems, telephone systems or supply chain, possible risks associated with data privacy, information security and intellectual property, possible work stoppages or increases in labor costs, possible increases in shipping rates or interruptions in shipping service, effects of competition, possible risks that inventory in channels of distribution may be larger than able to be sold, possible risks associated with changes in the strategic direction of the device business, including possible reduction in sales of content, accessories and other merchandise and other adverse financial impacts, possible risk that component
parts will be rendered obsolete or otherwise not be able to be effectively utilized in devices to be sold, possible risk that financial and operational forecasts and projections are not achieved, possible risk that returns from consumers or channels of distribution may be greater than estimated, the risk that digital sales growth is less than expectations and the risk that it does not exceed the rate of investment spend, higher - than - anticipated store closing or relocation costs, higher interest rates, the performance of Barnes & Noble's online, digital and other initiatives, the success of Barnes & Noble's strategic investments, unanticipated increases in merchandise, component or occupancy costs, unanticipated adverse litigation results or effects, product and component shortages, risks associated with the commercial agreement with Samsung, the potential adverse impact on the Company's businesses resulting from the Company's prior reviews of strategic alternatives and the potential separation of the Company's businesses (including with respect to the timing of the completion thereof), the risk that the transactions with Pearson and Samsung do not achieve the expected
benefits for the parties or impose costs on the Company in excess of what the Company anticipates, including the risk that NOOK Media's applications are not commercially successful or that the expected distribution of those applications is not achieved, risks associated with the international expansion previously undertaken, including any risks associated with a reduction of international operations following termination of the Microsoft commercial agreement, the risk that NOOK Media is not able to perform its obligations
under the Pearson and Samsung commercial agreements and the consequences thereof, the risks associated with the termination of Microsoft commercial agreement, including potential customer losses, risks associated with the restatement contained in, the delayed filing of, and the material weakness in internal controls described in Barnes & Noble's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended April 27, 2013, risks associated with the SEC investigation disclosed in the quarterly report on Form 10 - Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 26, 2013, risks associated with the ongoing efforts to rationalize the NOOK business and the expected costs and
benefits of such efforts and associated risks and other factors which may be outside of Barnes & Noble's control, including those factors discussed in detail in Item 1A, «Risk Factors,» in Barnes & Noble's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended May 3, 2014, and in Barnes & Noble's other filings made hereafter from time to time with the SEC.