Not exact matches
Congress is considering a proposed $ 13 million study which would analyze the
benefits of a free school breakfast for all
students — in low - income and
wealthy neighborhoods alike.
He also claims that New York's education budget is too high, without noting that because of the wide disparities of income in the state, children in
wealthy districts
benefit from much higher spending and
students in poorer districts have to make do with far fewer resources.
The relationship, which is based on grounds of mutual
benefits, is ideal for
wealthy businessmen and female
students who seek a better lifestyle in foreign land.
Those politicians who fall for the «ALEC treatment» become puppets who push the conservative, right - wing group's education policies and proposals back home — legislation designed to
benefit ALEC's
wealthy benefactors and turn a profit on the backs of
students without any regard for their educational wellbeing.
While we believe a focus on Pell completion is laudable and absolutely called for, the proposal fails to account for the percentage of Pell - eligible
students enrolled within institutions; and, as a result, any new funding will likely
benefit wealthy, selective campuses where low - income
students are the least likely to enroll.
But she failed to note that the top Hartford
students, who were the top before Sheff, are now the ones in these choice / charter / magnet schools, so all the State of Connecticut is shamelessly doing is moving some
students around, spending money on a small number of schools, and only integrating if
wealthy and non-integrated suburban
students can
benefit.
High - quality preschool improves
students» social, cognitive and developmental readiness for kindergarten, putting them on track to long - term success in school.5 The
benefits are especially critical for low - income
students, who typically hear 30 million fewer words spoken than their
wealthier peers by age 2 and face an uphill battle to early literacy and math proficiency throughout their education.6
The final budget bill cut state K - 12 spending by nearly $ 800 million, over7 percent — the largest amount in Wisconsin's history — and limited local governments» abilities to make up for these cuts through property taxes.14 That same year, Gov. Walker passed major tax cuts primarily targeted toward corporations and the
wealthy that totaled $ 2.33 billion over 10 years.15 Gov. Walker and Act 10 proponents argued that the bill's reforms would allow schools to offset these cuts by reducing teachers»
benefits and hiring lower - paid teachers, preventing budget cuts from affecting
students.16 Gov. Walker also argued that eliminating requirements to bargain over salary structures, hiring, and working conditions would give schools additional flexibility needed to attract and retain higher - quality teachers.17
In addition, aid from the government, merit aid from universities and private programs increasingly provide more
benefit for
wealthier students with high grade - point averages and top scores on entrance exams.
Skeptics might assume that these
benefits are associated mainly with
wealthier schools, where well - resourced libraries serve affluent
students.