Sentences with phrase «benefits of a low carbon economy»
Graham ended his commentary on the subject on this note: «I do believe the environmental benefit of a low carbon economy is worth the Republican party's time and attention.
https://www.motherjones.com/ Not exact matches
«If the UK is to reap the huge financial benefits of developing a low - carbon economy, bold policies to achieve this must be at the forefront of government thinking, not consigned to the margins.»
DiNapoli said investments in the New York State Common Retirement Fund may also be threatened by these efforts, and the order will make it more difficult for difficult for U.S. companies and workers to «benefit and profit at the forefront of the rapidly developing global low carbon economy.»
There is currently a window of opportunity to put the UK economy decisively on a trajectory towards low - carbon prosperity, resource security and environmental quality: resource costs are low, the added benefits of stimulating directed investment are large, and structural reform is required in any case;
«As business leaders, it is our belief that the benefits of strong, early action on climate change outweigh the costs of not acting... a sufficiently ambitious, international and comprehensive legally - binding United Nations agreement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions will provide business with the certainty it needs to scale up global investment in low - carbon technologies... the shift to a low - carbon economy will create significant business opportunities».
«The economic benefits opened up by transitioning to a low - carbon economy are real and substantial,» Campbell's «Climate Action Team» wrote of the Stern Review.
We don't know whether what you claim are benefits of «cheap» fossil fuels can really be attributed to their low cost or not, as we can't go back and check on every case as its price impacts work their way through the economy, nor can we speculate about foregone benefits, or whether the benefits are due to the artificially reduced price of burning carbon or whether people would enjoy them (or even greater benefits) in a fair market, except by examining by Capitalist analysis.
The four key differences are: 1) unlike the Energy Policy Conservation Act (EPCA), the CAA [Clean Air Act] allows for the crediting of direct emission reductions and indirect fuel economy benefits from improved air conditioners, allowing for greater compliance flexibility and lower costs; 2) EPCA allows Flexible Fuel Vehicle (FFV) credits through model year 2019, whereas the EPA standard requires demonstration of actual use of a low carbon fuel after model year 2015; 3) EPCA allows for the payment of fines in lieu of compliance but the CAA does not; and 4) treatment of intra firm trading of compliance credits between cars and light trucks categories.50
If the economists who note the benefits of moving to a low - carbon economy are right, and if we fail to halt the danger, then politics will be more to blame than economics.
This paper evaluates two broad groupings of options for reducing the regressive effects of a carbon tax; one group of options would affect large segments of the economy, for example by reducing payroll taxes, and the other group of options would be targeted at low - income households, for example by providing an additional payment to households currently receiving electronic transfer benefits.»
While the EPA says its carbon rules will be a net benefit to the U.S. economy and result in lower electricity prices, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups are warning that it could cause a jump in energy prices and damage to the tepid U.S. economic recovery.
«However, if we want this ensure we reap the many benefits of becoming a low carbon economy we need to see this political support for renewables continue.
The Global Commission on Economy and Climate found that if we focus heavily on low - carbon investments, it would add less than 5 % to the total cost — a cost that would be offset by the economic benefits of things like energy efficient buildings and cleaner air, without even taking into account the many future benefits of avoiding further climate change.