Empirical evidence should be the basis for a serious — and unprecedented — conversation among policymakers as well as the general public about the costs and
benefits of teacher tenure and the circumstances under which it should be granted and revoked
Not exact matches
The authors concluded that, «Oregon's policymakers and citizens allocated substantial resources to its retirement system and, in return, received little economic
benefit in the form
of promoting longer
teacher tenures.»
Anecdotal data also suggest that, even setting aside the enormous
benefit of the job security that accompanies
tenure, the fringe
benefits of public school
teachers compare favorably with those in the private sector.
Statewide
tenure laws remain largely intact, as do laws that require a specific set
of education - school courses before a
teacher can be certified, despite the paucity
of evidence that such courses (or certification) yield
benefits in the classroom.
First, the argument for eliminating
tenure: As Judge Rolf M. Treu
of Los Angeles Superior Court ruled on Tuesday, any
benefit that
tenure provides to
teachers is far outweighed by its costs to children and society by keeping grossly ineffective instructors in the classroom.
While we certainly see the strong
benefit of offering job security for teaching - track faculty (and recognize that higher levels
of job protections likely attracts more excellent
teachers to the university), giving them de facto
tenure would eliminate this important lever for department chairs, deans and provosts.
In the few instances when researchers have focused on the issue
of teacher tenure specifically, they have generally sought to document the costs and
benefits of tenure, make normative arguments about whether
tenure should or should not be abolished, or propose specific ways in which
tenure policies could be improved.
Tenure reform should balance the
benefits of using this protection to attract and retain good
teachers with the costs it imposes by making it more difficult to eliminate bad
teachers.
A team
of ten New York City
teachers started exploring
teachers» perspectives on current
tenure regulations in August 2014, after which they spoke with experts, researched
tenure policies and crafted recommendations that will elevate the teaching profession and
benefit students.
In spring 2014, the Alaska Legislature passed House Bill 278, which included the following language in Section 52: «No later than June 15, 2015, the Department
of Administration shall present to the legislature a written proposal for a salary and
benefits schedule for school districts, including an evaluation
of, and recommendations for,
teacher tenure.»
By 2018 all current
teachers who have earned
tenure will no longer have this
benefit, which offers due process rights in the event
of dismissal or demotion — not a guarantee
of a lifetime job.
Given that defined -
benefit pensions (along with near - free healthcare
benefits, near - lifetime employment rules in the form
of tenure, and seniority - and degree - based pay scales) have been proven to be ineffective in either spurring improvements in student achievement, are a disincentive in rewarding high - quality work by
teachers (who get the same levels
of compensation as laggard colleagues), and actually serve as a disincentive to luring math and science collegians into teaching, it is high time to scrap this and other aspects
of traditional
teacher compensation.
But with
teachers confronting the overhaul
of evaluations and
tenure as well as looming changes in pension
benefits, the small but rapidly growing charter school movement — with schools that are publicly financed but privately operated — is pushing to redefine the arc
of a teaching career.
The 7th Circuit Court
of Appeals said that since the state's original 1927 law and until the 2012 change, «Indiana
teachers...
benefited from enforceable contractual rights when they became
tenured.
For years, the institute has been laying the groundwork for radical changes to Missouri's education system, producing reports, testimony, and policy papers purporting to show the
benefits of ending
teacher tenure and enacting vouchers in the form
of «tuition tax credits,» along with other efforts to privatize education and undermine
teachers» unions.
You make
teachers more accountable (lowering
benefits, replacing
tenure with «merit pay») and you put students through high - stakes testing to make sure they've learned the exact body
of knowledge you want them to have, or, alternatively, how to pass a standardized test.
Parents and
teachers must join together to eliminate
teacher tenure systems that protect bad
teachers and that divert our best
teachers away from many
of the students who could
benefit most from their skills and experience.