Perhaps because the research literature on the strength of Boston charter schools is so compelling, charter proponents have focused more on touting academic
benefits than debating financial costs.
Not exact matches
Prodding your people to be less conflict adverse can lead to real
benefits, according to Thompson who cites recent research that shows, «brainstorming groups that engage in open
debate, challenging each other in benevolent ways, perform better
than groups that don't have any
debate at all.
Rather
than debate their utility, we should focus on how we can minimise the pain of the inevitable adjustment and maximise the
benefits of our resource economy for all Canadians.
The monetary policy
debate over whether rule - like behavior is preferable to pure discretion dates back at least to Henry Simons in 1936.1 More recently, in their Nobel Prize - winning work, Finn Kydland and Ed Prescott demonstrated that a credible commitment by policymakers to behave in a systematic rule - like manner leads to better outcomes
than discretion.2 Since then, numerous papers using a variety of models have investigated the
benefits of rule - like behavior in monetary policy and found that there are indeed significant
benefits.
We need to build appealing subcultures rather
than advance our own version of the Great Society or spend all of our energy on roiling national
debates that stand far apart from the everyday experience of those Americans who could most
benefit from what we have to offer.
Its health
benefits are up to
debate but I like using it more
than vegetable oils or olive oil.
The relative
benefits and risks of birth in different settings have been widely
debated in recent years.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 A problem when trying to evaluate the effect of birth setting on perinatal outcomes has been the use of actual place of birth rather
than planned place of birth to define comparison groups.
On the other side of the
debate, the American Academy of Pediatrics states that the
benefits for the infant in terms of reduced risk of infection, adult obesity, allergies, and asthma are so great that breastfeeding must be viewed as an «investment in your child's future» rather
than a «lifestyle choice.»
Trump's dismissal of Shulkin, and the nomination of a Navy doctor with no known policy views to take his place, has brought renewed focus to an increasingly contentious
debate over whether to give veterans the option of using the
benefits they earned through military service to see private doctors rather
than going to government hospitals and clinics.
These events — even more
than the use of nuclear weapons at the end of World War II — launched an ongoing public
debate over whether the risks of radiation exposure outweigh the
benefits of nuclear technology.
A study in this week's Scientific Reports by researchers at Michigan State University (MSU) and in China add more fuel to the already hot
debate about whether electric vehicles are more environmentally friendly
than conventional vehicles by uncovering two hidden
benefits.
Further, Stewart found that laughter
benefited secondary candidates more
than front - runners in televised
debates by improving their likability among viewers.
Rates have already been low for several years, and there's much
debate about the
benefits and costs of the Fed's policies — including the message it sends that the economy's recovery is slower
than expected.
On average, teachers enjoy considerably larger pension
benefits and health - care packages
than do comparable professionals in the private sector, a point of contention in recent policy
debates.
Roebuck went on to specify the social and political
benefits of an educated populace, including the possibility of reasoned
debate rather
than «a stack - burning peasantry or sturdy pauper population,» and «a people industrious, honest, tolerant, and happy.»
It's a
debate that includes disputes over whether charter schools — untied to neighborhood boundaries — should be leveraged to help integrate public schools racially and socioeconomically, whether poor students
benefit more from diverse classrooms, and whether charters are indeed less integrated
than their district school counterparts.
In the dog world it's almost as
debated as dog training methods, but as concerns about parvovirus rise across the UK, you may be left more confused
than ever as to whether your dog will or won't
benefit.
The greater number of deaths in winter (in the UK) compared to the summer, better crops due to a longer season and increased «plant» food are two obvious areas of
debate, as are the economic
benefits by having lower priced energy
than will be the case with renewables.
The other issue is that often the hot issues in the public
debate are not all that well suited to the short journal publication route, and there is
benefit to putting the material out there in the public domain quickly, rather
than waiting for the cumbersome peer review process.
In fact, there's no clear convenience
benefit to plastic bags versus paper or reusable bags, reusable bags can be re-used many times more
than plastic bags, and the energy question is still very much up for
debate.
I focus on the probability that carbon pricing schemes will succeed rather
than debating the various estimates of the projected costs and
benefits; the latter are extensively
debated in the literature.
sawed in half the global warming illusion that the formerly mainstream media had sold as reality, all of a sudden there's massive upheaval: dogs and cats living together; news networks hosting climate
debates; CBS exposing taxpayer - funded boondoggle junkets to Copenhagen; and politicians (other
than Oklahoma Sen. James Inhofe) boldly denouncing fraudulent research about the «
benefits» of «solutions» to global warming.
This, along with wildly exaggerated climate damage scenarios, is needed to justify aggressive short - term interventions such as the Al Gore or Stern proposals.14 Since calculated net
benefit results for a two - hundred - year horizon are extremely sensitive to the choice of a discount rate, the
debate over the discount rate is far more
than technical.
We should certainly fashion a climate policy that will maximize the economic
benefit associated with reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and what that policy should look like is a valid
debate in which all who would like to participate are more
than welcome.
This allows the appropriate cost
benefit analysis (maybe this is getting to far into politics) that should be significantly more useful for the main
debate than these temperature predictions that we have and takes many unpredictable factors out of the equation and if we have a full chain of logic it should be easier to find — because time as opposed to amount of carbon related models leave you asking questions like «what will happen to technology»
Having listened to both sides of the anthropomorphic global warming
debate, I find no evidence that a doubling of CO2 will harm the planet — there's good reason to believe that the very slight warming that will result will
benefit more people
than not.
The key
benefits of such injunctions were the speed with which the English courts can decide upon the issue of jurisdiction and the ability to have the
debate over jurisdiction in English rather
than a foreign language without the need to instruct legal advisers in another country.