Sentences with phrase «benevolence trust»

This exemplifies the social chain: procedural justice (and interactional justice)- > non-economic satisfaction - > benevolence trust (and integrity trust)- > affective commitment (and normative commitment).

The operational definition of ability trust refers to the degree of retailers» belief that suppliers have various relevant abilities; benevolence trust refers to the degree of retailers» belief that suppliers care about them; and integrity trust refers to the degree of retailers» belief that suppliers are honest and candid.

Affective commitment is mainly influenced by benevolence trust (β = 0.407, t = 13.472) and integrity trust (β = 0.415, t = 13.667) and not by ability trust (β = 0.030, t = 1.296).

By contrast, we find that retailers» perceptions of suppliers» procedural justice (and interactive justice) mainly influence non-economic satisfaction rather than economic satisfaction, while non-economic satisfaction mainly affects benevolence trust (and integrity trust) rather than ability trust.

Benevolence trust is mainly influenced by non-economic satisfaction (β = 0.709, t = 31.445) and not by economic satisfaction (β = 0.140, t = 6.213).

The measure of trust used in this study is divided into ability trust, benevolence trust and integrity trust.

With respect to the outcome domain, distributive justice has a greater effect on ability trust than on benevolence trust (and integrity trust); distributive justice has a greater effect on continuance commitment than on affective commitment (and normative commitment); and economic satisfaction has a greater effect on continuance commitment than on affective commitment (and normative commitment).

To summarize the discussion, distributive justice, economic satisfaction, ability trust and continuance commitment are variables that belong to the outcome domain; procedural justice (and interactional justice), non-economic satisfaction, benevolence trust (and integrity trust) and affective commitment (and normative commitment) are variables that belong to the process domain.

Benevolence trust is mainly influenced by procedural justice (β = 0.343, t = 10.102) and interactive justice (β = 0.477, t = 15.051) and not by distributive justice (β = − 0.017, t = − 0.707).

By contrast, benevolence trust indicates retailers» trust in suppliers» kindness and the sincerity of concern about them.

Continuance commitment is mainly influenced by ability trust (β = 0.550, t = 17.933) and not by benevolence trust (β = 0.018, t = 0.465) or integrity trust (β = 0.035, t = 0.864).

Therefore, benevolence trust and integrity trust belong to the «process domain».

The measured items pertaining to ability trust, benevolence trust and integrity trust are obtained through modification of the scale developed by Jarvenpaa, Knoll, and Leidner (1998)[44] to measure ability, benevolence and integrity.

In the process domain, procedural justice (and interactive justice) has a greater effect on benevolence trust (and integrity trust) than on ability trust; procedural justice (and interactive justice) has a greater effect on affective commitment (and normative commitment) than on continuance commitment; and non-economic satisfaction has a greater effect on affective commitment (and normative commitment) than on continuance commitment.

Not exact matches

To establish trust, Robert Hurley, a professor of management at Fordham University and the author of The Decision to Trust, recommends using the CBASIC method — communication, benevolence, aligned interests, similarities, integrity and compettrust, Robert Hurley, a professor of management at Fordham University and the author of The Decision to Trust, recommends using the CBASIC method — communication, benevolence, aligned interests, similarities, integrity and competTrust, recommends using the CBASIC method — communication, benevolence, aligned interests, similarities, integrity and competence.

But I trust that our countrymen will not be softened to that kind of crimes and criminals; for if we should, our hearts will be hardened to everything which has a claim on our benevolence.

The free market, he argued, permits a beneficial moral modesty that trusts people acting in pursuit of their own self - interest far more than it trusts avowals of disinterested benevolence or claims to morally superior rights.

In schools trust is considered to be the result of several dispositions working in concert, among these are integrity (or honesty and openness), concern (also called benevolence or personal regard for others), competence, and reliability (or consistency).

The judge held that the payment of # 100,000 from the trust fund did fall within the benevolence exception and so did not have to be set off.

The positive relationship between employee secure attachment and trust in one's supervisor is mediated by perceptions of supervisor (a) ability, (b) benevolence, and (c) integrity.

The negative relationship between employee counterdependence and trust in one's supervisor is mediated by perceptions of supervisor (a) ability, (b) benevolence, and (c) integrity.

In regard to the relationship between trustworthiness and trust, our findings showed that ability and benevolence were significant predictors of trust, while integrity was not significantly related to trust.

Normative commitment is mainly influenced by benevolence and integrity trust and not by ability trust.

The partner who has only honesty and benevolence without ability can offer only non-economic benefits (also called social benefits), not economic benefits; this leads to difficulties in gaining the full trust of the other party.

Although the dimensions of trust proposed by Kumar, Scheer, and Steenkamp (1995a, 1995b)[12][22], namely, honesty and benevolence, are frequently adopted, we believe that a more complete account would involve the three dimensions of ability, benevolence and integrity, proposed by Mayer, Davis, and Schoorman (1995)[23].

H3: Continuance commitment is mainly influenced by ability trust and not by benevolence and integrity trust.

Individuals who are in relationships characterized by high levels of social trust are more apt to openly exchange information and to act with caring benevolence toward one another than those in relationships lacking trust.