Sentences with phrase «best critique of»

Attempts have been made to discredit / refute Lindzen + Choi, which showed a 2xCO2 CS of around 0.4 °C; the best critique of this paper comes from Spencer, who does not agree with the L+C approach of analyzing the ERBE satellite data, and concludes from the data that the 2xCO2 CS should be around 0.6 °C instead.

Perhaps the best critique of the model comes from AIR itself.

The best critique of Niebuhr from a feminist perspective is Plaskow, Judith, Sex.

Published in 1966 and still fresh today, Rieff's book (we particularly recommend the introduction) is the original and best critique of our therapeutic culture.

Only recently a woman who is a teacher has said that I have made a good critique of a feminist interpretation of scripture and that she longs to be critiqued and more not that she not be critiqued because she is a woman.

Postmodernism contains a good critique of modernism, for which the church should be grateful.

One of the best critiques of the dominance of the homo faber image of human existence is still that of Sam Keen.

While I think the film is dated (watch «They Live» for a better critique of the failure of trickle - down economics in horror form), the Scream Factory Blu - ray restoation is typically fantastic.

Tamino also provides a good critique of the BEST approach.

Not exact matches

One of a number of reasons I stayed out of my business offices and worked at home as much as possible was because when I went to the office, I was «drawn» to listen in on, interfere with or critique every phone call, look at every fax, poke my nose all the way into everything — to the extent that I ruined everybody else's productivity as well as my own.

But the effect of such critique and disagreement is amplified in a world in which your customers as well as the general public can post online messages about you, more or less with impunity.

In an email he sent Ackman, who is one of the world's best - known hedge fund managers, was a link to Hempton's latest critique of the Canadian drug maker's potential problems, one of the most detailed produced by anyone yet.

While her arguments are plausible and the issue important enough to consider seriously, her critique of UNICEF seems strongly influenced by her own personal experience, and UNICEF does have good reason (given the number of not - so - legitimate international adoptions) to want to regulate international adoptions in the interest of children.

«For anyone driven crazy by the faux warm and fuzzy PR of the so - called sharing economy Steven Hill's Raw Deal: How the «Uber Economy» and Runaway Capitalism Are Screwing American Workers should be required reading... Hill is an extremely well - informed skeptic who presents a satisfyingly blistering critique of high tech's disingenuous equating of sharing with profiteering... Hill includes two chapters listing potential solutions for the crises facing U.S. workers... Hill stresses the need for movement organizing to create a safety net strong enough to save the millions of workers currently being shafted in venture capital's brave new world.»

See, the movement of dialogue in short order from development economics on the post-modern social marxian critique, bound up in decades of thought from well before the vertical rise in its popularity in the 1960's to today.

Copy Critiques: In these one - hour sessions, we go over a sales letter, or a video sales letter script, or a webinar script, or a magazine or newspaper ad... or just about any other kind of copy you'd like to get the best sales results from.

This gives you ample time to see critique the level of prominence as well as additional time to fine tune any issues you might encounter in the process of trading the signals.

Yeah, but I don't think he had a lot of distance and I think even his critique of Vestager when he said well, you're only doing this...

Yet the statement drew some swift critiques given that, in recent days, a number of accounts — including the support team for cryptocurrency exchange Kraken — reported that they had seen their accounts restricted despite trying to warn others about copycat accounts that mimic well - known industry members.

Each of these can cause us to be more critical than normal and often manifest as false critique in the form of «Church would be better if...» The problem with better is that it is too subjective to be a helpful aspiration in this context.

The fact that First Things published a long article on my book Mercy: The Essence of the Gospel and the Key to Christian Existence is an honor even when the article is a critique, which — as usual in academic disputes — needs critique from my side as well («What Mercy Is,» March).

I want people to give me fair critiques and love me enough to tell me the truth about myself, I'm distrustful of people who have nothing but good to say.

Morally, as Ruether has noted, the individual is ambivalent, fundamentally good but capable of great evil; consequently, a feminist critique must keep hold of a judging as well as an affirming dimension if it is truly to respond to the human condition.

[My response to the comment generated a lot of «likes» as well, but I'd still love to hear your thoughts on that critique.

And many have bought the critique that religion is, at best, a primitive and outmoded version of science.»

At the risk of being perceived by David as being «NOT helpful» in responding to your request of an example of a critique I personally have made that was received well.

Thus, metaphors and models of God are understood to be discovered as well as created, to relate to God's reality not in the sense of being literally in correspondence with it, but as versions or hypotheses of it that the community (in this case, the church) accepts as relatively adequate.16 Hence, models of God are not simply heuristic fictions; the critical realist does not accept the Feuerbachian critique that language about God is nothing but human projection.

They grow impatient with my constant critique of religious institution and spiritual organization, as well as what they consider the incessant whining of the walking wounded who've had these unusual and infrequent negative experiences.

Nationally syndicated columnist Dan Savage may be better known for his very public critiques of Catholic leaders than for the year he spent in a high school seminary, or for his Catholic deacon father, or for the baptism he and his husband sought for their son.

It is a distinct pleasure to respond to the critique of Father Eric C. Meyer, who was the first Catholic theologian to respond seriously to my work, and who in many ways knows my own position, or, at least my route to it, better than I do myself.

So when Kim shared a small piece of her own story about leaving the institutionalized church and connecting to a less traditional community of believers, I mixed the well - meaning, thoughtful critiques in the comment section with some of the messages I've been getting from critics lately, and this is what I heard:

I think that white feminist theology that seeks to examine class and race privilege well addresses critiques of womanists and other women - of - color feminists.

Newman's critique of liberalism's aversion to dogma comported well with my own aversion to liberalism.

Best of all, when explaining common blind spots in communication, Cleveland often includes herself in critiques, citing specific examples of how she's made the same mistakes.

His challenge to communities of religious faith is to acknowledge and take the measure of that intelligence, while at the same time fashioning a constructive critique that can raise the standards by which we assess what qualifies as the best and brightest.

The critique carries over into ethics as well, with the rejection of the dualism of good and evil, right and wrong.

It is good of you to critique his words as they are very harmful and unfair — keep up the good work!

He then goes on to praise E. D. Hirsch's Cultural Literacy as a more useful critique of current educational practices because it works in «the framework of a Deweyan understanding of democracy» in which students are to be made better citizens by preparing them to «recognize more allusions, and thereby be able to take part in more conversations, read more, have more sense of what those in power are up to, cast better - informed votes.

To those who still say that such a critique is invalid, I would reply that their view is at best totally un-Heideggerian and, at worst, contrary to the results of the careful analysis of someone like Karsten Harries, whose views I have tried to present.

My experience conviction is also that sometimes the best road to hermeneutical retrievals of tradition is through critique and suspicion.

I suspect the hand of my good friend Paul Murray, who in January this year had a piece in New Blackfriars titled «Theology «Under the Lash»: Theology as Idolatry Critique in the Work of Nicholas Lash» with the perhaps distracting pun on my name.

Any recovery of an appropriate religious vision, moreover, must be one that does not merely ignore these subsequent developments, but that allows us to review and critique where we have gone wrong in our relationship to God's good gift of the earth.

It provides a good warning to conservatives against falling into the trap of defending the idea of «judicial supremacy» in their critique of the president's statement about a «group» of unelected people striking down a congressional law.

Readers interested in a theoretical critique of animal rights as antiliberal would do well to consult Luc Ferry's 1992 work Le nouvel ordre ecologique (The New Ecological Order, scheduled to be published in translation by the University of Chicago Press in 1995).

It provides a good warning to conservatives against falling into the trap of defending the idea of «judicial supremacy» in their critique of the president's statement about a «group» of unelected people striking down....

So I might as well say why I find Robert Penn Warren's account of the «agrarian» critique of modern society to be superior to Wendell Berry's.

At the same time, it provides grounds for a sympathetic critique of the charismatic movement's foibles, as well as of the foibles of evangelicals and social activists.

For all my critique of popular Kantianism, let me say that Eberstadt's book is really good.

Leo Strauss offers the most perspicacious critique of modern rationalism because he never loses sight of the question of the good of thinking, and therefore of the problem of the relation between theory and practice.

In this critique, the church fathers have been regarded as men of a sexist time whose work presumed the inferiority of women (as well as woman's responsibility for the introduction of evil into the world).