Sentences with phrase «best fit the role»

Your vote is your own, but to work within the system you should vote for the candidate you feel best fits the role that the election seeks to fill.

Once you've found a great opportunity and determined how well you fit the role and the company, it's time to start planning out your cold email.

It's a great idea to give a quick snapshot of your key strengths, either as a two or three - sentence summary of how you best fit the role, or as a bulleted list of your main skills, talents and selling points.

Hence, cover letters are the best way to introduce you and how well you fit the role.

It should showcase your skills and how well you fit the role.

Not exact matches

By forgoing endorsements, newspapers could better fulfill that role: They would be making a statement that news organizations provide impartial information - and readers should act on it as they see fit.

The first and probably largest fallacy is that the evaluation can tell you whether a person is a good fit for a particular role.

We talked to a number of men about the role as well, but Michelle's particular blend of software experience and her approach to building a sales team made her a hand - in - glove fit for Testlio.

He has a better understanding of what the company does, what we're working towards and how my role fits into that.»

And if getting to know you makes them think you're not a good fit for the role, it's just as well.

After deciding on the role to fill, they go through the traditional route of posting ads to different job boards, screening candidates, interviewing those who seem the most qualified and then hiring the person who is the best fit.

And indeed, to perform effectively in a job interview, you will need to be able to describe your accomplishments and why you're a good fit for the role, and do so in a confident, natural, relaxed - seeming manner.

So if you are in the market for a new job this year, we want to help you put yourself in the best possible position to find the role that is the right fit for you.

When it comes to deciding what jobs are the best fit for them, the survey results showed that 82 percent of millennials said work - life balance is a big factor, 76 percent said salary plays a major role, and 71 percent said work flexibility is key.

A trial period also allows the candidate to decide if the role is a good fit for them.

Sadly, this role was not a good fit.

If you're a good fit for a role, one of the Index team will contact you and discuss next steps.

But the lack of «fit» between my dad's theology and the choices of others who had a role in planning elements in the worship service were more often than not due to well - intended but theologically unfortunate inclinations.

For in accepting such responsibility for the next generation, in allowing ourselves even to suppose that it could be a fitting role for human beings, we lose the fundamental human capacity to love — to say to our children, to the next generation, «It's good that you exist.»

And so in due course I went to the University of Chicago to better fit myself for that role.

It is my view, however, that abandoning the discussion of what a substance is and of whether there is anything that fits this requirement has not removed substance thinking from a dominant role in academia as well as in much of our society.

I think the «higher power» can be our acknowledgement or role and situation, our fit into optimal living and placement, the recognition that there is a «better choice versus a worse choice» for each decision.

Despite his own monastic formation, this eloquent preacher to the turbulent, variegated «audiences» of the two Eastern capitals was certain that monks were not the best fitted for the role of priests, but rather those «who, though having their life and conversation among men, yet can preserve their purity, their calm, their piety, and patience, and soberness, and all other good qualities of monks more unbroken and steadfast than those hermits do themselves.»

Disruption is under way but it needs to build impetus to continue and to push towards a better system, and supporting that is a fitting role for the fair food movement...

Well, on Walcott, mate, let me remind you that Arsene Wenger waited for eight years for crooked Abou Diaby to get fit and play the defensive midfield role, but never to be.

Unfortunately that is a big question mark following a number of setbacks in recent years, but Arsene Wenger is trying his best not to overuse the creative midfielder, and with any luck his extended time working into his key role will help him to stay fit through - out the campaign.

And on top of it he has great technical skill to fit in the mould & not be a simple destroyer just like Kante & maybe more... 5) Now getting both would be too much to ask... specially with our already stacked midfield & with Elneny bright outings since trusted into a bigger role spell good things ahead of next season & with full preseason... even Coquelin is playing less!

Whilst there is no denying that Brendan Rodgers could well do with attacking alternatives one would have to wonder how an 6ft 8in forward would fit into the Liverpool's boss's style of play, not least as Andy Carroll was loaned out to West Ham due to his apparent unsuitability for a forward role at the Merseyside club.

If Welbeck isn't fit then we have other players who can play the wide right role, Wilshere done well when he has come on and he could do well there for a game, Gnabry is back from injury and may be match fit.

In a free role from the right - hand side, Mesut Ozil could finally find his very best form under Klopp's management, fitting his playing style perfectly as he settles in in English football after a slow start.

2) No leaders across the pitch: Özil for all the money is no leader but a technically gifted player who can split a defense with an exquisite vision and pass, Sanchez for all the dribbles as the potential but is not there yet, Cazorla will never be in the conversation, Mertesacker is not fit to be one anymore, Coquelin for all the good he has done is too tender and inexperience, Giroud no WC player to assume the role... the only one who can seriously be a leader is Wilshere but unfortunately until he becomes consistent and set the tone with his talent and passion... 3) Mertesacker is a shell of himself and it would be an embarrassment to see him continue to play in his current form, get Gabriel out just for the sake of showing anybody in this team that there's no place for under performers: we paid good money to get him so play him!

There are better players technically but he's a real quality player and I think he'd be perfect as much for the fact he's versatile and the right wing / striker positions is where our team could be improved and he fits that role perfectly.

When Ozil is fit again, I / m fairly sure that we will soon see him back where he can best influence a game and utilise his talents, in the number 10 role behind the forwards.

Wilshire might actually be a better fit in that role, though he does not score like Ramsey does and Arsenal need goals from the CM position.

So with Cazorla now fighting for the box - to - box role as well as Rambo and with boith of those and Theo Walcott options on the right, Wilshere not only needs to stay fit, he needs to up his game to have a chance of playing for Arsenal.

With Elneny establishing himself in the team's starting line up it means when Ramsey is fit he will fight with Iwobi (who is a central midfielder as well) for the wide role.

I would most like to see you share your observations about the player you wished, how his qualities fit to our squad, and provide evidence on how said player can do a better job than another in the same role, so that everyone can debate on the same grounds.

I would also not be against starting Chambers at DM for this game; he has earned a spot in the starting 11 but if Koscielny and Mertesacker are both fit to play they should take their starting jobs back; starting Chambers at DM will give him good experience in the role and with our preferred CB pairing behind him he won't have to worry about being perfect in that role.

Ask yourself this one question, which role does he really fit in the England squad, I bet you want to ponder now... Please give wenger a break and I wish him all the best of lucks because he is just another glorified king benthner who think he his better zlatan Ibrahimovic and ronaldo put together.

rAM: Quite a few good choices out their and to be honest I think Gnabry and The Ox will dominate that role when they are both fully fit so this spot is a luxery IMO.

Our side has been on the look - out for an experienced defender to add to the ranks, and Luiz would certainly fit into that category, having won numerous trophies with Paris Saint - Germain and Chelsea, as well as having played a key role in helping the Blues to win the Champions League, and would be a huge boost to our team as we look to secure a spot in the top four, whilst also being available for the Europa League.

Cech clearly thinks that the hard hours have been well worth it and that the players are now very aware of their individual roles as well as how they all fit together to make the team as a whole tick.

I'd have focused more on Torres (which I did), the lack of CB depth (I'd prefer to have two quality CBs to back up a 3 back rather than just one with one of the starters being a converted CDM), the lack of players who fit the outside mid role well in this formation (which, hey, maybe that's part of what you were referring to), and the fact that when you play more attackers higher up the pitch, it often requires a team to be able to implement a high pressuring defensive line (Dempsey and Bruin are not suited for that).

I kind of agree with you.If Xhaka is a CM and Ramsey is a CM this means we have to CM's in the centre which I just don't get.This raises questions whether Xhaka's role in the team is well defined.If the likes of Wilshere and Ramsey are fit we must sell before we bring in another CM.Those two are very good but their fitness is a problem.

If the story is true and the Hammers do go ahead with an offer in the region of # 25 million for the fleet footed forward, I find it hard to imagine us turning them down, especially as Vardy may well be set to occupy one of the wide forward roles that Theo usually takes up, when he is fit and in form that is.

The United manager admitted yesterday that he only has one fit centre half available for tomorrow's game at West Ham, and many would argue that his injured defenders aren't good enough anyway - playing a striker or a winger in an unfamiliar midfield role ahead of them is not going to help

A good choice for the skipper role if you ask me — but he has to be fit!

Although he's played second string to Ibra at psg he is out and out quality and put back in as CF I think he'd fit perfectly and rip it up in EPL I agree totally with need for DM and Krychowiak he's a definite matic for sure, the Coq is good but still needs development and personally I don't rate Arteta in that role

Once fit I expect him to compete with Cazorla for that deep playmaker role, he has potential to be as good as our spanish maestro.

With key figures around him leaving, most notably the likes of Andrea Pirlo, Arturo Vidal and Paul Pogba, he's had to grow into a bigger role and take on more responsibility, and combine that with the technical class and flair that he possess, he may well fit in perfectly at the Nou Camp if Messi gets his way.