Because association is indispensible to an understanding of the achievement of
the best of human possibilities, such as art, science, philosophy, religion, society.
Not exact matches
It's
best to open up the
possibility of not having to write that termination letter at all and shed valuable
human capital.
Unfortunately in my case, I've probably gone to excess the other way... after 43 years
of being (in my view) threatened with hellfire for every cotton - picking thing (including the «sinfulness»
of being born in the first place because it's a
well - known scriptural fact that every
human is born sinful and separated from G - d, with a heart that does nothing but desire evil and no way to please G - d even when righteous), threatened with being «left behind» in the rapture (should I fail on some doctrinal (belief) point at the crucial moment)... I refuse to consider ANY
possibility of hell at all.
One virus - particle doesn't change color, but as it procreates mutations in that process can make the resulting child - virus differ from the parent - virus, so that the child - virus is capable
of infecting a
human as
well as the original host thereby opening the
possibility for a new
human disease.
It is an expression
of the wonder
of being
human when people take miserable circumstances and discover unexpected
possibilities for some
good, even some growth in them!
The
good life can be lived only with due recognition
of such restraints as
well as
of the great
possibilities of the
human will.
Good lives are made rather than found, he insists, simply because without overriding values for human life, the possibilities of a good life are highly varia
Good lives are made rather than found, he insists, simply because without overriding values for
human life, the
possibilities of a
good life are highly varia
good life are highly variable.
and thus there is no
possibility that the awesome variety
of conflicting opinions about the things most important to
human beings, including the
best political order, can be transcended toward universal and objective knowledge.
A priori (by «dichotomic» analysis
of the various outlets theoretically offered to our freedom
of action) as
well as a posteriori (by classification
of the various
human attitudes in fact observable around us), three alternatives, together forming a logically connected sequence, seem to express and exhaust all the
possibilities open to our assessment and choice as we contemplate the future
of Mankind: a) pessimism or optimism; b) the optimism
of withdrawal or the optimism
of evolution; c) evolution in terms
of the many or
of the unit.
The Renaissance appreciated
human aspirations and the continued new
possibilities of the
good.
I acknowledge that the social environments
of family, race, class, education, work, culture, cult and nation are the inescapably
human contexts that shape all our
possibilities and achievements as
well as our blindnesses and follies.
They recovered the classical experience
of reason as the potential infinity
of human questions, showing how this dynamic «ratio» as a desire for understanding is healed and transformed by the paschal - metanoetic experience
of faith in the Sophia - Cod
of compassion and love.4 Aquinas, for example, understood God as «intimately present within everything that exists since God is existence» and that Cod's omnipotence — Aquinas wrote very little about it — regards not actualities but
possibilities, and is
best manifested in forgiveness and compassionate mercy.5
The
well - known phrase «impossible
possibility» stands here in Niebuhr's thought for the warning that the pure love
of God transcends
human possibility.17 At the same time an element
of uncalculating sacrificial giving
of the self to the
good of the other is possible for man.
«
Human nature is, in short, a realm of infinite possibilities of good and evil because of the character of human freedom.&r
Human nature is, in short, a realm
of infinite
possibilities of good and evil because
of the character
of human freedom.&r
human freedom.»
If the doctrine
of the new life
of the Christian is the hardest
of all to believe, as in our disillusioned time it must be, still there can be no
good news
of Christ apart from the
possibility that in some measure the life
of love can actually be lived on this dark and bloody battlefield
of human history.
Thus the issues which are being debated anew in the theological turmoil today center in the meaning
of Christian love as it points on the one side to the
possibilities of human existence, and as it points on the other side to a fulfillment
of this life in an ultimate
good which transcends the
possibilities of this world.
His evaluation
of politics is shaped by the conviction that Christianity has understood
human possibilities and limitations
better than its Marxist and liberal competitors, so that the prospects for the future depend greatly on recovering Christian insights, understanding them and using them to shape our political expectations.
He ultimately argues that there was an original act
of violence which ultimately led to the
possibility of the destruction
of all people in the community, and so to avoid the ever - increasing cycles
of violence, the community selected a ritual victim (a
human or an animal) that would both carry the guilt
of the community as
well as the violent tendencies into death, thus satisfying the demands for revenge and the blood lust that comes with it.
But more to the present point, it is by sacrifice — by the voluntary loss
of some
good out
of devotion to a greater
good, that the highest
possibilities in
human life are realized.
Because, it is claimed, evaluation presupposes valuation as a condition
of its
possibility, any merely «disinterested» or «value - free» understanding
of human reflection is
of necessity excluded.20 Any consideration
of the evidence
of experience could only in the nature
of the case ever illustrate, but logically could not falsify what must always necessarily be the case, even if such a consideration could
well force a limited reconstrual
of the hermeneutical analysis always itself presupposed in the strictly conceptual presuppositional analysis which uncovers the necessity
of such elemental valuing.21
Against H. Richard's emphasis on
human finitude and dependence, Reinhold's awareness
of human freedom and the Christian's political responsibility seems
better to acknowledge the creative and liberating
possibilities of moral action and
of God's work in history.
A socio - biologist can tell a young woman on the
best scientific authority that nature designed her, body and mind, to conceive, bear and care for children, but it he can not tell her in the name
of science that in so doing she will fulfill her
human possibilities, and he can not answer her when she declares war on such natural necessities.
Depth
of loving is our
best human possibility — even if now and again (as psychologists tell us) it is
of the love - hate variety.
But, from the Bible's point
of view, even more disquieting is the
possibility of human freedom, symbolized by the tree
of knowledge
of good and bad.
The
possibilities which are presented are blessedness which comes from self - fulfillment and the acceptance by God
of that self - fulfillment — all
of this,
of course, in relationship with others and not in any presumed
human isolation
of self hood — or the disintegration or failure which comes from self - destruction or rejection by God because there is nothing to be received by God in His consequent nature for the furthering
of His purpose
of good in the course
of the process
of creative advance.
From this decisive affirmation, we can receive some
of its positive ingredients as a new
possibility for
human improvement, without romanticizing it as the apex
of all
good.
But perhaps I have not sufficiently stressed still another important matter, namely, that in all
human decisions, and the actions that are consequent upon them, there is likely to be serious distortion
of, or a sadly imperfect response to, the
possibilities for
good.
(As far as
humans are concerned, there is no reason for us to reject the
possibility of some sort
of subjective survival beyond death as
well as an objective immortality in God's own feeling.)
Nevertheless, from the facing
of the fourfold source
of human suffering, I do come to a reassuring conclusion: on the basis
of no - God I can see no possible explanation
of the problem
of good, but on the basis
of faith in God I can see the wide - open
possibility of Mind and Purpose here and
of an ultimate outcome which will vindicate the Creator.
In disclosing undreamed -
of possibilities for us, revelation seeks to expose the very core
of human longing as
well.
But we should grasp the obvious truth that in a society where what is supposed to be
good and right is imposed either by some supposed divine fiat or by required conformity to «what the Joneses do,» there is, in fact, no
possibility of genuine moral principles involving both
human freedom and
human accountability.
This allows for the
possibility of unlimited capacities including: creativity, critical thinking, multi-level development
of intelligence, social consciousness, healthy interpersonal relationships and a
well - rounded, emotionally - grounded
human being.
The technique, which requires genetic engineering, can not be applied directly to people, but the achievement points toward
better understanding
of human aging and the
possibility of rejuvenating
human tissues by other means.»
The self - renewable capacity
of these cells, their ability to differentiate into several tissue progenitors (neural, mesenchymal stem cells...), and the
possibility to work with mutated cell lines define
human stem cells as a
good basis for screening compounds libraries in order to discover new potential drugs for monogenic diseases.
Such modifications in
human beings raise the
possibility that we are changing not merely a single individual but a host
of future individuals as
well, with potential for harm to occur to those individuals and perhaps to humanity as a whole.
Throughout this he, along with writers John Logan and Dante Harper, explore new territory with the creation and existence
of the alien species as
well as the
possibility of androids outsmarting
humans.
There's a whole new world to explore in Planet 51, and the
best principal gag the movie can come up with in the whole realm
of possibilities available to a strange, undiscovered planet is that the native beings
of the planet think
of a
human being as an alien.
If you can convey resilience to others through this experience, find hope in the face
of tragedy, and
human connection in the face
of rage, there is the
possibility for all
of us to build a
better world.
We develop teachers and leaders who believe in the
possibility of human change and growth, and who fight tirelessly for
better outcomes for kids.
Knowing something about the past
of others helps us to know them
better, and a general knowledge
of history can alert us to the range
of possibilities inherent in
human affairs.
The more I protested about this ambiguity, the more Joanna pointed out to me that it was both a terrible and wonderful part
of life: terrible because you can't count on anything for sure — like certain
good health and no
possibility of cancer; wonderful because no
human being knows when another is going to die — no doctor can absolutely predict the outcome
of a disease.
The spaying also help female cats from inheriting dangerous diseases to its kitten, which is
good because some
of the diseases have a
possibility to affect
human.
Narrative in visual art can do this subtly and
well: make us alive to the
possibilities of human interaction.
Set within the iconic location
of Bath Abbey, this exhibition brings together seven art works, each
of which meditate upon the fragility, as
well as the infinite
possibility,
of human existence.
If we have had 1C
of warming (giss) since pre-industrial and
human made aerosols are masking between 0.5 and 1.1 (Samset et al) and there is warming «in the pipeline» as
well — has the
possibility of a 1.5 C target already passed?
[Response: Do you think that scientists are not
well aware
of the
possibility of confirmation bias or have no sense
of «
human nature» as you call it?
If anything, the people watching and listening to a lady talk about last night's wild party on her cell phone can provide several minutes
of entertainment to help the time pass The point is that riding the bus, train, or trolley allows the
possibility for all types
of experience and
human interactions - this should be seen as a
good thing.
At the same time there's been little or no interest in even the
possibility that warming may be beneficial — in spite
of the experience
of the last 150 years, in spite
of the history that teaches that
humans deal
well with whatever changes happen — and that
human society has always flourished in warmer times.
But I think fertilizing vast sterile ocean with iron and creating more food for ocean life [and consequently more food from
humans] is a
better way to go - you using CO2 for a
good purpose rather just storing somewhere - and storing CO2 in gas / ice form has some
possibility being suddenly released some way, whereas CO2 in skeleton
of tiny creatures most likely ends up as limestone.
We emphasize the complexities
of these types
of relationships to: (1) recognize the heterogeneity
of gendered and generational perspectives within and across communities, (2) acknowledge the
possibilities of productive discussions that place diverse ontological and epistemological conceptualizations
of human - environmental dynamics together, (3) challenge top - down solutions, institutional norms, and bureaucratic restrictions that may serve as barriers to
best practices, and (4) identify multimedia and internet - based outputs that can serve both local and researcher constituents.