Sentences with phrase «best rights of the child»

It could play a very important role indeed in helping to ensure that this is what happens, that the best rights of the child are considered and that it means, in most cases, near equal access to each of their parents.

Not exact matches

Charles: Right, I think that's a huge demographic question that I haven't seen any really good statistics on because of course most of the boomers are still in their late 50s or 60s, early 70s and they're not yet to the point where the older generation like the boomer parents, the so - called silent generation, which has sold their houses or given them to their offspring, their adult children.

«No better example of this exists than right here in Central Florida, where our company has been a steadfast supporter of Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children and the Winnie Palmer Hospital for Women & Babies.»

Think of the «rules» or what is right and wrong, like a parent who sets guidelines for their child to keep them safe, and when they step out of those guidelines a good parent disciplines the child.

Better would be our appreciation of the invincible right of mothers wed and unwed to be mothers; the state (or church) has no right to break the natural bond between mother and child with misplaced moralism.

Now, Job after his bought with «pride» he ask YHWH for his forgiveness, and was later blessed with more sons and daughters who did the law, who were good children and an even better wife, and he lived for four generations of his children and their children, and died a very happy and fulfilled life, knowing that all of his family was left with love, and peace and togetherness among each other, now this is true life, living righteously and wholesome by ourselves and by others around us is what we are all suppose to live like, caring for your neighbors faithfully, and all be as one now not after it is too late but now we need the law of righteousness from YHWH, the 10 commandments, the sabbath, a day of rest, and the passover to remember the ones who died innocently, and to remember the freedom of our lives given by YHWH and do good by one another and not let each other fall, right now is what we need in this world today people.

If the child is «viable» at 21 weeks — then it's viable at 1 week — or 2 years — and if your theory is the woman should have the right to choose — well — then you'll have alot of women tossing their toddlers out the window.

«They really are trying to give it their best shot, and part of what they're doing is trying not to take their children out of the world... so that they're children can be salt and light right across society.

But the language of «children's rights» is not likely to serve us much better.

I'm confused it says they will be gossips conceited unholy haters of good without love self love people in the end times to stay away not even to receive them not even pray for them is that blasphemy then it says they hold firm to a godliness but deny its power but I thought blasphemy they don't hold firm to any godliness but are not drawn by the spirit at all to wan na ask forgiveness even it says god is just and will forgive why I wish he would forgive all things his children suffer over that can't change need to also it says if u can say Jesus is lord the holy spirit is with u right or u couldn't even say those words please someone help I've been suffering

Later he would say that «those kinds of questions [to starve the afflicted child] can be answered best by the people who are right there on the scene, if they think clearly and act responsibly.»

We know that praying instead of actually doing the right thing can be damaging... look at the Schiables - two innocent children dead because they prayed instead of being good parents.

To obey Paul's command for your children means giving them more than a rational faith — it means also giving them a well - formed Christian imagination that can look at a starry night sky and see more than the infinite reach of empty space and the eternal stretch of endless time, that can «keep seeking the things above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God» (3:1).

In a good home, no matter how many children there may be, each possesses individual status and rights, and in the eyes of all the rest has separate and inalienable meaning and worth.

It was filled with empty chairs and Christmas lights, and there in one far corner, a gathering of parents stood smack right in front of the risers filled with children in their Christmas best.

We both work and we keep this house and we are raising children to hopefully love God and to love people, and we all try to do a bit of good in the world right now, too.

When asked if dads should get the same time off as mothers after the birth of their child he replied: «I don't see why not, a child has two parents often and actually to give them both equal rights is a good thing.

When the price of a new suit will immunize a thousand children, when the money we would spend on a new television or a fancier vacation would feed a starving village for a week, when the down payment on a new car would dig a new well and provide new life and hope — do we have this right?

I guess christians are so well versed at doublethink and can read the bible and believe in all its teaching in the blink of an eye, this is childs play, right?

Don't you think God loves us at least as much as a good parent who delights in the activities of her children, regardless of whether they get everything right?

«that he thought that bats were birds» ---------- I know, right!?!? And he had the audacity to speak to a group of people and called them «men» when He knew full well that there were women and children in there!

A passionate animal rights advocate, he's already given huge portions of his fortune to PETA and the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, as well as Save the Children and his own vegan food relief organization, the Sam Simon Foundation.

The myth gets it right: there is no doubt about the power of a child or that the misguided desire of adults to «get the better of a baby» leads to forms of abuse both subtle and vicious.

Parents urge their children to work hard in school, to fill their resumés with just the right sorts of activities, to get good job experience.

Then we have eugenics programs, testing of chemicals and radiation on unsuspecting civilians, slavery, women having no right other than to shut up and stay in the kitchen, children working in factories... I'm not seeing where we were doing all that well when we were supposedly so Godly.

The rights of women and children are better recognized and safeguarded than in earlier times.

Here Dowsing pulls few punches, presenting well the «children as gift», not burden or right, argument and is very clear on the immorality of separating the unitive and the procreative.

This is gravely immoral and in open contradiction to the principle, recognised also in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, that the best interests of the child, as the weaker and more vulnerable party, are to be the paramount consideration inevery case.&rChild, that the best interests of the child, as the weaker and more vulnerable party, are to be the paramount consideration inevery case.&rchild, as the weaker and more vulnerable party, are to be the paramount consideration inevery case.»

The gay rights movement needs to clean house to win a better public image of itself so that people stop contemplating scenarios where their children will be exposed to something as horrifying as some of the messages out there.

No person in their right mind thinks that harming a child is good and no person in their right mind still believes in oppression of women... that's crap from 60 years ago, not today and like your god, it belongs in the past.

Some may be somewhat in limbo because of differing opinions as to what is right, for example, abortion which is regarded by some as horribly immoral and by others as a legitimate step in some cases toward better family life with better rearing of those children who are born, and toward a better - fed world.

Children have their «just rights» within a family, and excessive domination by their parents is neither good psychology nor good religion; yet the undisciplined child suffers severely from his lack of restraint, and without some coercion there can be no «harmonious relation of life to life.»

I think he would also tell us to raise our children with good morals and a sense of right and wrong.

You must be mistaken... why, the conservatives HAD to be at the forefront of assuring the rights of freed slaves, ending the deliberate government policy of destroying native cultures, extending the vote to ex-slaves and women, ending child labor, creating safer and better working conditions for laborers, etc?

Yes... this is the severist most ignorant form of human brotherhood... but Bill Nye, is taking the first step towards his goal, and the goal of many athiest activist... take the rights away from God believers... because... a hundred reasons... children will be hurt, holds back our country yada yada... be careful who you get suckered in by as you travel these few years we are given on this earth... allow your brother to be your brother... allow him to chose for his life and family... never cross the line of «knowing better.»

Why would the act of killing a child ever be good or right?

When we start fighting for the rights of those that ARE born and are alive by anyone's definition of the word and I believe the world we are bringing children into allows them the best future and chance for survival, then I may revisit my position.

These rights are enshrined in Canon Law: «Parents have also the duty and the right to choose those means and institutes which... can best promote the Catholic education of their children... Parents must have a real freedom in their choice of schools.»

As well as listing their vices, including murdering and betraying each other, Luther turned once again to describing the well - known examples of their doctrinal errors: «They put that noble child Mary right into the place of Christ.

globalisation with a human face, global citizenship, sustainable development, good governance, consensus - building, global ethic, cultural diversity, cultural liberty, dialogue among civilizations, quality of life, quality education, education for all, right to choose, informed choice, informed consent, gender, equal opportunity, empowerment, NGOs, civil society, partnerships, transparency, bottom - up participation, accountability, holism, broad - based consultation, facilitation, inclusion, awareness - raising, clarification of values, capacity - building, women's rights, children's rights, reproductive rights, sexual orientation, safe abortion, safe motherhood, enabling environment, equal access, life skills education, peer education, bodily integrity, internalisation, ownership, bestpractices, indicators of progress, culturally sensitive approaches, secular spirituality, Youth Parliament, peace education, the rights of future generations, corporate social responsibility, fair trade, human security, precautionary principle, prevention...

Okay, Dad gets a bit pis sed... often... but that was the past... (well, He's gonna be pis sed in the future here soon if the FoxNews Christians get their way)... I mean really, my child, what kind of God am I if something humans do can ruffle my feathers... well, the Bird gets pretty pis sed as well... he's a puffy mess right now, actually... Somebody clean the mess of feather and poop up please... sorry... where was I...

Based on the logic of compassion and discrimination it will be a good argument for a Child Predator to make himself right.

humans have equal rights under the law and the sooner you set aside the indoctrination of hate and seclusion you were taught as a child the better life will be for all.

When a person's belief drives them to take a man's children away from him for no reason other than who he loves, or drives them to rape a lesbian woman to make her straight, when a person's faith tells them it is good and right to kill another person because of their faith or lack thereof... these are harmful.

I love the whole spirit of Christmas; The Christmas story from the bible is beautiful and so is the whole St. Nick (Santa) story and they both touch my heart... if you only want to love the jolly old elf because he gives toys to children then that is certainly your right... because we live in the land of the free... Peace on Earth and good will toward men (and women)... no matter what you believe.

The modest war hero probably could have published a best «seller in 1945, but he chose to tell his story only much later, when it seemed right to make his children aware of their heritage.

Right now, however, doors are slamming and voices are raised upstairs, so I think I'd better go put my own assumptions about children and parenting, if not education right now, into some kind of forceful acRight now, however, doors are slamming and voices are raised upstairs, so I think I'd better go put my own assumptions about children and parenting, if not education right now, into some kind of forceful acright now, into some kind of forceful action.

But they have failed, because one can not deny that our cause is open to all who worry about the rights and well - being of children.

What I think I'd like to do is to write about it here in a series of posts, hand - in - hand with these homeschool book posts, taking on what I think he gets right as well as assumptions about children, parenting, and education with which I take issue.

Is this your same logic you use when you help to put an end to Obama Care, yours are looked after soon to heck with the poors children let them die because they were stupid enough to be born to poor people, is this your idea of christian values, well they match the republician and tea parties ideology right down the line worship money loath things that help the common man... Very christian indeed!