Sentences with phrase «best vehicle injury»
He is affiliated with the best vehicle injury attorneys across the country — including your state.
http://www.michigan-no-fault-auto-accident.com/ Not exact matches
The investigation followed a report by Reveal on Sunday alleging that Tesla under - counted and mis - labeled employee injuries at its electric vehicle factory in Fremont, California, as well as a paint shop fire that occurred there in early April.
As a matter of fact, a good majority of car seat injuries happen outside of the vehicle according to this report on webMD.
Paying for insurance, maintaining a safe vehicle, and seeking a well - reviewed auto accident attorney if an injury results from a collision are things car owners need to be taking seriously, especially if children are frequent passengers.
Injury death — including those due to intentional injury, with suicide most common, as well as unintentional injury, with motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) causing a majority — is the third leading cause of death in the United States.
Structure, restraints, kinematics, and injury to all four body regions were well - protected in these vehicles.
Larry Kwiecinski, engineering group manager for the GM Global Safety Center, noted, «In our vehicles without knee airbags, the vehicle structure, the seat belts and the instrument panel are all designed to help absorb crash energy and reduce lower - leg injuries, as well.
If a vehicle earns a good rating, it means that in a real - world crash of similar severity a driver using a safety belt would be likely to walk away with little or no injury.
IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in high - speed front and side crash tests, a roof strength test for rollover protection, plus evaluations of seats / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.
A 2008 Institute analysis of insurance claims found that, all other factors being the same, drivers of vehicles with seat / head restraint combinations rated good in Institute evaluations were 15 percent less likely to sustain neck injuries in rear - end crashes than drivers of vehicles with poor head restraints (see «Neck injury risk is lower if seats and head restraints are rated good,» March 15, 2008).
Long - term injuries, or those lasting three months or more, were 35 percent lower for vehicles with seats / restraints rated good compared with seats / restraints rated poor.
The Spark is the only vehicle with good injury measures for all body regions, including the lower leg and foot, generally a problematic area in the small overlap test.
For Acura and Mercedes vehicles with auto brake, claim frequency for injuries to the insured vehicle's occupants tended to be lower as well, while results were the opposite for Volvo.
The single most common injury to people riding in a vehicle is neck sprain and the most effective tool to combat this injury is a good seat design.
A vehicle's overall evaluation is based on measurements of intrusion into the occupant compartment, injury measures recorded on a Hybrid III dummy in the driver seat, and analysis of slow - motion film to assess how well the restraint system controlled dummy movement during the test.
In a 2009 Institute study of vehicles with good ratings for frontal crash protection, small overlap crashes accounted for nearly a quarter of the frontal crashes involving serious or fatal injury to front seat occupants.
A 2008 Institute analysis of insurance claims found that, all other factors being the same, drivers of vehicles with seat / head restraint combinations rated good in Institute evaluations were 15 percent less likely to sustain neck injuries in rear - end crashes than drivers of vehicles with poor head restraints.
Consequence: If the terminal was damaged, the passenger side curtain airbag could fail to deploy in an accident or deploy without cause (you can't very well say «accidentally» because that is exactly what it is designed to do), increasing the risk of passenger injury in a motor vehicle collision.
The third test measures how well vehicle seats and head restraints protect people against neck injury in low - speed rear crashes.
A similar speed reduction in a higher speed crash would significantly reduce injury risk, as well as vehicle damage.
IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in a moderate overlap frontal crash, small overlap frontal crash, side impact and rollover, plus evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.
In a release issued yesterday the institute said results from 2009 testing showed that small overlap crashes accounted for nearly a quarter of the frontal crashes involving serious or fatal injury to front seat occupants in vehicles that otherwise had good rating for frontal crash protection.
IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in a moderate overlap frontal crash, small overlap frontal crash, side impact and rollover, as well as evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.
Research shows that drivers of vehicles that earn good ratings in frontal offset crash tests have significantly lower risk of fatal injuries in real - world frontal crashes, compared with drivers of vehicles with poor ratings.
Looking at crashes involving claims of $ 2,000 or more, analysts found 16 percent fewer insurance claims were filed for neck injuries among females in vehicles with good - rated seats / head restraints compared with people in vehicles with poor seats / head restraints.
An updated HLDI - IIHS analysis shows that injury rates are 11 percent lower in rear crashes when vehicles are equipped with good head restraints compared with poor ones.
In a 2009 IIHS study of vehicles with good ratings for frontal crash protection, small overlap crashes accounted for nearly a quarter of the frontal crashes involving serious or fatal injury to front seat occupants.
The designs of head restraints in an increasing number of passenger vehicles are improving so that many occupants are better protected from whiplash injury in rear - end crashes.
The designs of head restraints in more and more passenger vehicles are being improved so that many occupants are better protected from whiplash injury.
Each vehicle's overall evaluation is based on three aspects of performance — measurements of intrusion into the occupant compartment, injury measures from a Hybrid III dummy positioned in the driver seat, and analysis of slow - motion film to assess how well the restraint system controlled dummy movement during the test.
Each vehicle's overall evaluation is based on measurements of intrusion into the occupant compartment, injury measures recorded on a Hybrid III dummy in the driver seat, and analysis of slow - motion film to assess how well the restraint system controlled dummy movement during the test.
The Jetta is the first vehicle to earn the top rating of good in every individual measurement category (injury measures, head protection and structural design) of the Institute's side impact test.
The Institute rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal, or poor based on performance in high - speed front and side crash tests plus evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.
This is an extreme test and one that would likely result in injuries in the real world but is survivable in a well - designed vehicle.
In 1995 the Institute began to rate head restraint geometry, finding only 3 percent of vehicles had good head restraints while those in 82 percent of new passenger vehicles were poor (see Status Report special issue: whiplash injuries, Sept. 16, 1995).
Each vehicle's overall evaluation is based on measurements of intrusion into the occupant compartment, injury measures from a Hybrid III dummy in the driver seat, and analysis of slow - motion film to assess how well the restraint system controlled dummy movement during the test.
ARLINGTON, Va. — The designs of head restraints in an increasing number of passenger vehicles are improving so that many occupants are better protected from whiplash injury in rear - end crashes.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety or IIHS was formed in 1959 with and its main aim is to lower the number of motor vehicle accidents as well as the amount of injuries and property damage as a result of the vehicle crashes.
Fortunately, in most of these cases, damages owed by negligent pet owners for injuries to the driver or their vehicle are amounts well within their policy limits.
After chasing the suspect into an intersection, Peydro was struck by a vehicle, causing damage to his teeth and jaws (which will require surgery after his spinal injuries heal), as well as extensive damage to his vertebrae.
It is worth noting that a Tesla vehicle is over five times less likely to experience a fire than the average gasoline car and that there have been zero serious injuries or deaths for any reason ever, fire or otherwise, in a Model S. Over the course of more than 100 million miles driven in almost every possible terrain, weather and crash conditions, the Tesla Model S has consistently protected its driver and passengers, achieving the best safety track record of any car on the road.
Jason Pettus is a civil litigation defense attorney with a strong litigation background through the representation of general contractors, subcontractors, owners, and design professionals in the resolution of all manner of construction issues, including construction / design defect claims, environmental claims and contractual disputes, catastrophic injury, premises liability, and motor vehicle accidents in both state and federal courts, as well as insurance coverage analysis, advisement of clients, and coverage litigation.
Liability insurance is the minimum amount of insurance required, because it's designed to award compensation for injuries sustained by the insured driver as well as other motorists» vehicle damage.
If it's related to workers» compensation, you'll also want an attorney who has that background, while a personal injury attorney will be good for a motor vehicle case.
Our motor vehicle injury lawyers might be able to help you file for compensation to help support the needs of your loved ones, depending on the circumstances of your claim, and this compensation might help to continue paying the bills and mortgage on your home so that you do not have to worry about the security and well being of those people who rely on you.
Motor vehicle injury claims in Kansas City are exactly the kind of personal injury claims that the lawyers who work for Ketchmark and McCreight, P.C. are most experienced in and best prepared to lead you through, regardless of your circumstances.
If it is then possible for us to take on your claim and see you through the entire legal process, you can rest assured that your motor vehicle injury claim will be in good hands.
With deep experience in product liability matters and class action litigation, including catastrophic injury and wrongful death cases, as well as consumer fraud, he represents national and international companies, including manufacturers of motor vehicles, power tools, pharmaceuticals, clothing, glass products, outdoor power equipment, and industrial machinery.
Throughout our decades of successful experience, our accident attorneys in Florida have helped many families recover from catastrophic accidents as well as set industry - changing vehicle safety precedents that worked to prevent similar injuries from hurting other families.
Given the complexities of motor vehicle compensation today, it is best to consult a law firm that specializes in personal injury law.