Sentences with phrase «best water physics»

It has the best water physics I have ever seen, and there are several other unique

Again, if they spent more time exhausting every bit of the 360's power to give us better water physics, we would all complain that they're wasting time and resources, thereby delaying the game on the one everyone is waiting for, which is the PS4 and Xone.

Not exact matches

«This raises the possibility that water may re-accumulate after extraction, but we need to better understand the physics of why and how this happens to understand the timescale over which water may be renewed.»

Another advantage to a shared sewer is that such systems are usually built to withstand heavy loads and can better accommodate periods of heavy precipitation or storm surges that might overwhelm smaller, poorly conceived or maintained home - based septic tanks, which are by virtue of their size and the laws of physics more prone to overflow and send contaminants into nearby surface and ground waters.

The authors first present the analytic equations and solutions for the limiting efficiencies of photoelectrochemical water - splitting devices based on the ultimate limits of device physics as well as two more realistic scenarios based on currently achievable material and device parameters.

Dark Energy Digital's HydroEngine, the physics engine created specifically for rendering Hydrophobia «s impressive water effects, makes for water that looks good and moves even better, naturally flowing where it wishes based on changes to the environment.

The game's wave physics and water animations are impressive even today, but they could look even better on a more modern piece of kit like the Switch.

It was also one of the first games to emulate the physics of moving water, as well as emulate the effects that weather would have on water, and subsequently the race as well.

Well for one thing, they turn water levels from an already tedious exercise in bad physics to an equally.

However, they can provide both positive and negative forcing» and Ray # 252 «we understand extremely well the way greenhouse gasses [sic] like CO2 warm the planet» So here we go — Assumptions from considerations of physics: Unless CO2 could enlist water vapour to amplify its forcing it would simply be an unremarkable trace gas in the atmosphere, but — CO2 + water (vapour) = + ve feedback implying warming CO2 + water (liquid) = - ve feedback implying cooling Facts: Clouds cover half the surface of the planet.

Carbon dioxide actually has a minuscule cooling effect, nowhere near as much as water vapour though That's genuine science because it is based on the laws of physics that are well proven over the centuries.

Physics tells us that the sea level can be influenced by a melting / accumulation of ice caps and glaciers, as well as a thermal expansion of ocean water.

And if this process of water changing state, which is pretty much just a process of physics and a bit of chemistry, is so very easy to get wrong — specifically, is so easy to model too conservatively so the models predict wrongly that it will be a very slow process when in fact it seems to be a much faster process — how confident can we be that other models and estimates of processes that involve multiple feedbacks that include chemical and biological interactions as well as physical ones aren't even more wildly inaccurate on the «conservative» side?

The basic physics of greenhouse gases are simply not one of those things that are not well - enough understood and if you don't understand how greenhouse gases work you can't possibly move on to any reasonable debate about other phenomena which can and do (IMO) largely negate the effects of increasing greenhouse gases and leave us in a situation where the modest increase in carbon dioxide has vast beneficial effect by warming the planet at high latitudes where warming is welcome, not warming it at low latitudes where it is already warm enough, increasing the growth rate of green plants, and decreasing the water needs of green plants at the same time.

Features of the model described here include the following: (1) tripolar grid to resolve the Arctic Ocean without polar filtering, (2) partial bottom step representation of topography to better represent topographically influenced advective and wave processes, (3) more accurate equation of state, (4) three - dimensional flux limited tracer advection to reduce overshoots and undershoots, (5) incorporation of regional climatological variability in shortwave penetration, (6) neutral physics parameterization for representation of the pathways of tracer transport, (7) staggered time stepping for tracer conservation and numerical efficiency, (8) anisotropic horizontal viscosities for representation of equatorial currents, (9) parameterization of exchange with marginal seas, (10) incorporation of a free surface that accommodates a dynamic ice model and wave propagation, (11) transport of water across the ocean free surface to eliminate unphysical «virtual tracer flux» methods, (12) parameterization of tidal mixing on continental shelves.