Sentences with phrase «better at logic»

That is, if students work on logic puzzles, they get better at logic puzzles but not at other things, such as forming coherent arguments or winning debates.

Are people with a particular chunk of Denisovan DNA better at logic puzzles?

You atheists are no better at logic than the religious who post here.

Not exact matches

Our brains are remarkably good at some things, like pattern - matching, and we certainly do have a capacity for logic and reason.

As Vincent F. Hendricks, Professor of Formal Philosophy and Logic at the University of Copenhagen, cautions: «A good question is not necessarily one you can answer «yes» or «no» to.

The logic behind this piece of misguided advice seems sound at first: The average age of your credit lines affects your credit score, and the older, the better.

In this report, it was noted that CEOs of companies most successful at creating gender diversity have been committed to the cause at a much more personal level, with a passion that «goes well beyond logic and economics.»

In principle, explaining the logic behind new economic policies is supposed to be the job of politicians and the media, but available evidence would suggest that they are not very good at it.

I had in my heart and tongue the Name of Allah when ever I had fears, troubles or depression of any kind but from Jan 05 1995 when had lost my father and second brother in a car accident, it was the time I really felt am alone at age of 33 to face all the challenges my father has left upon me to run and manage among other partners therefore had been investigating the Quran as to understanding every word of it rather than to memorize it, have been did a lot of reciting verses of prayers begging God to look upon me and give me strength... am sure through such difficult times if I had no faith in God I would have perished and lost every thing long ago... Another thing my heart always gave me signs and my mind gave me logic of what to believe although have read many books abroad in my youth of many beliefs out of curiosity but could not belief in other than that God is one and Muhammed is his last prophet in all belief of the Quran he brought upon me / us in all that it says... Should mention at times had experienced dreams seeing signs and warnings long in advance of things going to happen A year or more before losing my father in a car accident I had seen him in my dream good bye wearing white cloth and going to board a tourist ship all crew dressed in white uniform rolling a red carpet on front of him and when was on the top of the stairs weaver smiling good bye... seen in another dream how or wealth will be stolen and what I will hold... so many things like that..

So by that logic if God is capable of everything good then Satan is an all right dude and probably chills with God and watches football games with Him, imagine being able to watch all the football games at once!

But then, obviously your reading comprehension and logic skills are minimal at best since you believe the buybull.

Furthermore, Steve, by your logic, marrying can't be good at all: since marrying a woman isn't good for women, and what is good is good for everyone, than marrying a woman can't be good for men or for society as a whole; and likewise marrying a man can't be good either.

I will also try to establish, or at least render plausible, the view that while the distinction between a logic of reason and a logic of the understanding may have been one that was necessary and legitimate for Hegel to maintain, it has, given developments in modern logic, as well as changes in the modern view of the nature of metaphysical thinking, become obsolescent.

But we may, I think, conclude with Errol Harris (AT 74) that from the Hegelian perspective, the philosophical shortcomings of classical logic extend to mathematical logic as well, and that as logic of the understanding, both deal with the «abstract concept of class or aggregate,» and are both inextricably connected with a metaphysics of externally related particulars that lose themselves in a «spurious infinite,» and with a concomitant mechanical cosmology.

A good deal of the time we may find it useful to begin there; and our preaching of the gospel, once it does begin there, can then move on with the profound logic of experience to the bold affirmation that in this Man, in all his human conditioning, God is discovering himself to us as at no other time and in no other place.

Fifth grade science at best, and the apologist's logic is deeply flawed.

While all evidence, logic and reasoning point to a Creator and absolute truth, you prefer to hide behind relativism and a theory of evolution which does not, in fact, describe the creation of the universe at all, or why concepts of good and evil or morality exist.

well, I sometimes bring some of those ways of thinking and operating to this blog... I do nt» mean to, it is almost like muscle memory... someone throws out a straw man arguement or circular logic, or some other logical fallacy, and well... sometimes I jump at it the way I would over at other blogs without maybe taking a moment to re-adjust my attitude.

It IS funny, because many people who claim that they are «scientific» just blindly accept «Corporate Science» aimed at keeping them logically ignorant, meaning, they can use logic and reason (and even rhetoric if you know your Trivium) to argue well for false ideas.

Well... I'm done reading your crappy reports and comment sections CNN, you've successfully turned another educated person away, and what do you care honestly, every time you turn away someone who understands logic and reason, you bring in 10 more lowly people with degrees from state college (I mean, «yes, they're ph.ds, but from state college??? that shouldn't really count, or at least should be considered the equivalent of a masters degree at a good school).

This my friends is a very good example of the religious brain at work - see the logic and compassion there?

On the basis of this insight, one is able to solve (or better, dissolve) the famous paradox of Epimenides the Cretan (who claimed that all Cretans are liars), or at least identify and clarify the nature of the paradox presently silk - screened on numerous APA fund - drive T - shirts, or, most importantly, circumvent Russell's own paradox of the class of all classes that are not members of themselves, a notion that was otherwise crucial to the attempt to demonstrate the foundations in logic of the arithmetic concept of number.

And that «return» (often called ressourcement theology) was not a matter of pious nostalgia but of intellectual adventure: a movement that sought to enrich the Church's reflection on her own nature and mission at a moment when theology risked falling into a sub-discipline of logic — something dry and abstract, detached from the explosive good news of the Gospel.

Faulty logic at best, and a very poor attempt to be relevant at worst.

Because what happens, again and again and again, is people listen to that logic, look at both sides of the issue, and say «Well then I guess I'm not a real Christian.»

If I apply your logic, I can easily say «Well, I believe in God, so I shouldn't need a program at all, I can just pray real hard.»

I know my human understanding and logic is flawed at best.

Besides, the organizational logic of the change in style is dubious at best.

At 5, it might have been slightly more difficult for me to out - think you and use better logic.

Instead, however, and as the best substitute, the Church would need to give the individual Christian three things: a more living ardour of Christian inspiration as a basis of individual life; an absolute conviction that the moral responsibility of the individual is not at an end because he does not come in conflict with any concrete instruction of the official Church; an initiation into the holy art of finding the concrete prescription for his own decision in the personal call of God, in other words, the logic of concrete particular decision which of course does justice to universal regulative principles but can not wholly be deduced from them solely by explicit casuistry.

Carol Tauer, a philosopher at Minnesota's St. Catherine's College, has recently challenged the moral logic of this declaration, as well as of the current pastoral teachings on abortion, in an incisive and thorough analysis of the tradition of probabilism — a theory of practical decision - making that is accepted in Catholic moral teaching.

By following your logic, one would arrive at the conclusion that slavery is ok as long as you «treat» your slave well...

My logic is this, if Wenger was to leave at the end of the season the new manager could buy the players he wants, The board would be more understanding in releasing funds and better players always move in the closed season.

Krish n'chips logic... So people who shopped at bhs have no right to criticise the greed and malevolence of green because he turned the place around for a few good years and anyway no one forced them to who there!!

The best logic based case you could make before the game for a State win was that State follows that game plan, keeps it close, and at the end maybe magic happens.

Nothing intrinsically special about 10 years in footballing terms — I, admittedly with no better logic, look at the decades in terms of the 80s, 90s, 00s etc and feel better about us and we still have another 5 years to complete our history for this decade!

The logic is that it's a position of value, a position of need, and this is the best chance you're going to have at getting one without overspending in FA or packaging up multiple draft picks to move up.

Let me remind you of the 2013/2014 window where we had a good chance of winning the title... our dear manager in the January transfer window signed only Kallstrom, an injured player, who couldn't play until April while we still had a chance at the title and logic suggested he needed to bring in a striker.

keep calm lol why did not even win the game from andre the team which players are very young (avg 20 years) santi he is out of from but he played every 90 min.wenger logic chamber he is not rb.why the hell wenger sent jenki on loan he is much better rb as compare to chamber and west ham at 4 and he started every single game.

It's hard to argue with their logic as all three clubs have hired new managers, Pep Guardiola at City and Jose Mourinho at United are arguably the two best managers in the world right now, and proven winners everywhere they've been.

This logic is the same as saying «hey this horribly incompetent Prime Minister and his cabinet are here for an other year so you might as well support him and cheer at his parade.»

The pretzel logic you use is comical at best, claiming we have better players than LC, yet the «desire» is not there.

So, using your logic, anyone who is not any good at 21, will become a great player when they get older?

And by your logic Ozil too should not start as he has been a liability, he had about 6 good games at the start of last season..

Was not analyzing the Manchester ss and don't really care much there but from a footballing point of view and from the words of MR wenger I understand the logic I do nt read what the media thinks neither My comment above addresses the issues we face in comparison to the two previous seasons adding in our re enforcements The 22 million question «Are the Arsenal capable of achieving 85 point come next May???» I believed we were strong last year and said it here that the team was strong and together and used the very words that MR wenger used cohesion but as the season unfolded the cracks showed up at the very beginning when we lost to west ham and it got worse as we lost pole position and every thing around us came tumbling down by February last season here comes another important question did they know and understand what happened do they know what to do this term to avoid the very same faith well we wait and see Irregardless of what happens I will support Arsenal and will keep analyzing every match my way until May so Good luck Arsenal with your endeavors and hope you do well against Liverpool keep the fight on keep the heads up and give them a good beaGood luck Arsenal with your endeavors and hope you do well against Liverpool keep the fight on keep the heads up and give them a good beagood beating

His manifesto at the Australian Open was heartfelt (and awfully well - written, especially for an athlete in the midst of competition) but fraught with gaping holes in logic.

I didn't mean to come across as condescending, I totally agree with you and i think he is a remarkably talented player, At the moment I would agree better than Ox, Walcott, Gnabry, Zelalem he has played more games this season, Logic being you play more, you gain more.

Now, I do understand the logic behind a RB at # 32 if you're going to rely on them as the guy, if you can have him become a 3 down back then it's worth it... Also a RB at 32 has a higher likelihood of being a difference maker because you'd be taking a top 2 guy at that position rather than grabbing the 3rd best OT or 4th best DLman etc..

He took Sanchez, Giroud (who was a nightmare for Kolo and Skertel) and Chambers off and brings defensive minded players... So even at 11 against 10 we were forced to back up because, and anyway, Welbeck is showing game after game why he was sold by Man United (not good enough and clumsy as f*ck) and we had no serious plan to go forward anymore... When the simple logic would ask you to leave Giroud upfront and Sanchez who are constant problems for defenders...!!!

The team ending up over the other at the end of the league — and since we do nt know that, using my mentioned logic is good enough — in my opinion