Sentences with phrase «better joint decisions»

«This could guide physicians and patients to making better joint decisions regarding the benefits of additional postoperative treatment options, such as radioiodine ablation,» Sosa said.

Not exact matches

Questions have been raised about the outlook for the FF91, given LeEco's spiraling cash problems as well as its decision to pull out of a joint project with British sports carmaker Aston Martin to develop RapidE electric car.

He criticized the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. the Board of Education, and in 1956, at the invitation of the governor, he addressed a joint session of South Carolina's legislature to support the concept of separate but equal for churches as well as for the public schools of the land.

While some Arsenal fans would be happy to see Arsene Wenger step down or be sacked from his role as the manager, and others still firmly believe that the Frenchman is the best man for the job and should carry on at the Arsenal helm as long as he is willing, the choice is not ours and it is likely to be a joint decision by the club and Wenger himself as to when his managerial reign comes to an end.

Explaining in great detail why this was a poor decision by the former Real Madrid manager, the Dutchman talked about the air pressure on the plane journey, as well as the effect of sitting down for so long on various joints.

The benefits include applying the best of each person's problem - solving skills, joint decision - making, and the shared experience of meeting challenges and basking in accomplishments together.

Because legal decisions will be made jointly, parents who win joint legal custody need to discuss important issues affecting their child's well - being on a regular basis.

To start, I always make sure that I am the right person to be working with that client because maybe there are doulas who are better at dealing with parents who are not interested in being active participants and joint decision makers in their births... Who can work with clients that say «I will never speak up.

A mutual acceptance of joint custody and the ability to reach shared decisions in the children's best interests, the second and third tests for joint custody suggested above, are imperative.

To examine how school meal programs have encouraged good decisions among their students, the Kids» Safe and Healthful Foods Project — a joint initiative of The Pew Charitable Trusts and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation — commissioned a nationally representative sample of school nutrition department directors.

The court primarily considers the best interests of the child when making custody decisions, and the state has gone on record that it believes joint custody is in a child's best interests.

Some barriers include the negative attitudes of women and their partners and family members, as well as health care professionals, toward breastfeeding, whereas the main reasons that women do not start or give up breastfeeding are reported to be poor family and social support, perceived milk insufficiency, breast problems, maternal or infant illness, and return to outside employment.2 Several strategies have been used to promote breastfeeding, such as setting standards for maternity services3, 4 (eg, the joint World Health Organization — United Nations Children's Fund [WHO - UNICEF] Baby Friendly Initiative), public education through media campaigns, and health professionals and peer - led initiatives to support individual mothers.5 — 9 Support from the infant's father through active participation in the breastfeeding decision, together with a positive attitude and knowledge about the benefits of breastfeeding, has been shown to have a strong influence on the initiation and duration of breastfeeding in observational studies, 2,10 but scientific evidence is not available as to whether training fathers to manage the most common lactation difficulties can enhance breastfeeding rates.

Earlier, he told his 45 MPs that it was a joint decision with his wife, Jane, for family reasons, and insisted it had been made well before the last general election.

The National Organization of Women and the good - government group Common Cause formally asked the state Joint Commission on Public Ethics to look into the circumstances surrounding Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver's handling of sexual harassment allegations against Assemblyman Vito Lopez, and Silver's decision to quietly settle an earlier complaint against the Brooklyn Democrat with a $ 103,000 payment.

«If you increase the doctor's information as well as their ability to share it with patients and make joint decisions, then I think the quality of care must improve,» he says.

In a joint statement from the state teacher unions, CTA President Eric Heins called the decision «a good day for students and educators,» adding, «it's time to get back to the real issues facing our public schools and work together to improve student learning and support the art of teaching.»

[Parties [are encouraged to][may][support and] implement][The [mechanism][framework] for] policy approaches and positive incentives for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation; and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks [and associated non-carbon benefits]; as well as [the [mechanism][framework] for] alternative policy approaches such as joint mitigation and adaptation approaches for the integral and sustainable management of forests; [and also the associated non-carbon benefits]; [which] consist of the decisions, methods and guidance already adopted under the Convention; [Parties are encouraged [to support their effective implementation][to implement] the [mechanism [s]-RSB-[framework [s]-RSB--RSB-.

A court will be hesitant to award joint custody, unless it looks like you and your former spouse are able to communicate about your child and make decisions together with the child's best interests in mind.

In countless Canadian and other decisions abroad, joint affidavits have been received and considered by the courts without any thought as to whether an affidavit made by more than one affiant at the same time and as to the same allegations is good evidence.

The temporary joint legal decision - making order situation made it clear a permanent co-parenting arrangement was not in the children's best interests.

Joint Custody: The parents both have the rights and responsibilities to make decisions about the child (ren), which are in the best interests of the child.

The court must presume that joint legal custody is in the child's best interests — that is, both parents have decision - making authority, unless there is evidence of interspousal battery or domestic abuse.

Joint custody is one of the best decisions that the court can make because there is less emotional strain on the child than in other child custody agreements.

The decision to fine exchanges flouting the Information and Communications Act, which include well - known names such as Korbit, Coinone and Coinplug, follows a joint investigation into security setups at ten exchanges which several government agencies ran from October to December last year.

See's the Big Picture Organizational Leadership Strategic planning Best practices & benchmarking Joint ventures and alliances Crisis management Multi-site operations Budgeting & finance and Decision making.

Tags for this Online Resume: Project Management, Project Planning, Project Development, Customer Relations Specialist, Process Improvement, Quality Assurance, Quality Control, Results - Oriented, Risk Management, Human Resources Management, Performance Measurement, Startups, Turnarounds, Cost Reduction Strategies, Strategic Planning, Workflow Planning, Finance Background, Financing, Employee Relations, Sales, Leadership, Natural Leader, Delegation, River Forest, Illinois, 60305, Vice President, Assistant Vice President, VP, AVP, Chicago, Oak Park, Business Development, Performance optimization, New Business Development, Budgeting, Finance, Corporate administration, World class organization, Crisis management, Organizational Leadership, Profitability improvement, Multi-site operations, Joint Ventures, Alliances, Consensus building, Consensus Teaming, Decision - Making, Benchmarking, Best Practices

The court is guided by the best interests of the child, and considers: the relationship of the child with each parent and the ability and disposition of each parent to provide the child with love, affection and guidance, the ability and disposition of each parent to assure that the child receives adequate food, clothing, medical care, other material needs and a safe environment, the ability and disposition of each parent to meet the child's present and future developmental needs, the quality of the child's adjustment to the child's present housing, school and community and the potential effect of any change, the ability and disposition of each parent to foster a positive relationship and frequent and continuing contact with the other parent, including physical contact, except where contact will result in harm to the child or to a parent, the quality of the child's relationship with the primary care provider, if appropriate given the child's age and development, the relationship of the child with any other person who may significantly affect the child, the ability and disposition of the parents to communicate, cooperate with each other and make joint decisions concerning the children where parental rights and responsibilities are to be shared or divided, and any evidence of abuse.

New Hampshire Statute 461 - A: 5 instructs state judges that «except as provided in Paragraph III [which «refers to abuse and neglect where the decisions of such a parent are clearly not in the best interest of the child»], in the making of any order relative to decision - making responsibility, there shall be a presumption, affecting the burden of proof, that joint decision - making responsibility is in the best interest of minor children.»

I emphasize that our goal is to have the best involvement of both parents, and that there be a joint decision on all major issues.

It is especially beneficial for parents, who though separating, will need to continue making joint decisions about their children well into the future.

Joint managing conservatorship is preferred in Texas if the parents can make shared decisions, have a positive relationship with their children, both participate in the children's upbringing, they live relatively close, and if joint managing conservatorship is in the children's best inteJoint managing conservatorship is preferred in Texas if the parents can make shared decisions, have a positive relationship with their children, both participate in the children's upbringing, they live relatively close, and if joint managing conservatorship is in the children's best intejoint managing conservatorship is in the children's best interest.

This article will examine recent decisions concerning the relocation of the custodial parent in sole or primary physical custody arrangements as well as the proposed relocation of a parent in cases involving a joint custodial arrangement, including both joint legal custody and joint physical custody.

Unlike some other states, California does not have a preference for joint custody, which means that California does not automatically presume that joint custody is the best decision for the child.

«The social science, which tends to be a step ahead of judicial wisdom, is that, again, absent certain circumstances, joint decision - making seems to be better for the children than having one absent or one in control parent,» he says.

«I'm not so sure there's a universal solution but I do think there's an option to consider about having the legislation being framed to say «we believe that it's in the best interest of children that there be joint decision - making unless a party can prove otherwise,»» Fogelman says.

At the practice level, this includes setting goals, developing case plans, making joint decisions, and working with families to ensure their children's safety, permanency, and well - being.

If both parents agree that joint custody is the best arrangement and ask the court for it together, if the DUI occurred some time ago, it might not have any impact on the court's decision at all.

When making a decision on whether to grant joint custody, most courts look at whether such an arrangement is in the best interest of the child.

In what must have been a difficult decision, the Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba held that it would be in the best interests of the children to give the mother and father joint custody, and for them to share physical custody of the children on a 2 -2-3 schedule.

Texas courts are inclined to name both parents as joint managing conservators unless there's a good reason why this wouldn't work, such as a history of domestic violence or some other circumstance that would make it difficult or impossible for them to confer on important decisions.

However, because joint legal custody covers only the sharing of decision - making between parents, it does not necessarily need to be modified to suit the best interests of the child when the noncustodial parent moves.

Joint legal custody applies to shared authority in making major decisions affecting your children's health, schooling, and well being.

Working through the details is best done when both sides can participate in joint discussions rather than having an arbitrary decision thrust on them by a judge.

Before involving a court of law in decisions involving joint legal custody, parents should first consider the best interest of the child.

Currently, many states have a default understanding or presumption of joint custody between parents with the added consideration that all decisions made revolve around the best interests of the children.

Instead of giving one of the parents authority over decision - making, instead of any healing (actually the better way to assure friendly relations in the future), make sure the children have no parent at all with such authority (it's called «joint custody»), no parent who has a complete picture of what they are doing or how they are doing (it's called «joint custody»).

While a number of researchers purport to have found relitigation rates lower following mediated decisions, or (primarily in early studies) in joint custody arrangements, not one of these studies appears to have corrected for (in the first case) the reality that negotiated agreements are not as legally amenable to modification as court orders, or (in both cases) that couples who achieved accord in mediation, as well as those who voluntarily chose early joint custody arrangements were already relatively more amicable couples.

See Scott & Derdeyn, supra note 66, at 484 - 96 (evaluating joint custody's accuracy as a legal decision principal, measured by the extent to which it efficiently reflects the law's policy objective, and concluding that while its decision costs are lower it does not accurately reflect the best interest of the child standard).

Wait a minute: back in # 1, they cite: «Acknowledging the long established legal tenet that fit parents act in the best interest of their children...» If neither parent is unfit, because joint custody was put into place, either parent's decisions are equally valid - requiring them to «demonstrate how the modification serves the child?s best interest» in decision making invalidates # 1's assertion that each fit parent acts in the child's best interest.

This decision contains sage words of wisdom with respect to how to assess credibility of witnesses, how we should approach the «best interests of the child» test, what is the real significance of «primary care parent», what sort of evidence one should present to the court re «best interests», the effect of domestic violence allegations, abuse allegations, what does «shared parenting» mean, what does «joint custody» mean and when should it be ordered, and the importance of past conflict.