Sentences with phrase «better knowledge of these things»

The better knowledge of these things will make his / her work efficient.

Not exact matches

Creating a network of smart, ambitious people to share knowledge with is one of the best things you can do for your business.

You don't need to have a cursory knowledge of everything; instead, be the absolute best at one thing.

To achieve maximum success and derive maximum value from your time, you must systematically, aggressively divest yourself of the activities you don't do well and don't do happily, so as to systematically invest your time (and talent, knowledge, know - how and other resources) in those things you do extraordinarily well, enjoy doing and find intellectually stimulating.

Speaking of the investigative journalism - focused movie to win the most recent Best Picture Oscar, Oliver said: «One of the things that made Spotlight so powerful is the knowledge that the newspaper industry today is in big trouble.»

Use that knowledge to capitalize on the things that you do well, and avoid the risks of getting in over your head in your weaker areas, Buffett advises.

Shipping the oil with the knowledge that you have a very good chance of cleaning it up is one thing.

Neither of these things have been, to the best of my knowledge, contended by Mr. Pettis.

Any business must consider the federal, state, and local laws that govern how a business is formed and managed as well as being knowledge about how to deal with taxes, deductions, and disclosures - among the many things covered under the area of regulations.

The best thing about being a part of a global network of employees is that you will get a broader perspective on topics, leverage knowledge from people with different backgrounds and work on projects involving so many countries in addition to the one you are seeing every day.

(2) Leave them alone, to enjoy (the good things of this life) and to please themselves: let (false) hope amuse them: soon will knowledge (undeceive them).

Actual possibility is how things actually are or will be, while theoretical possibility is how people (who don't propose to absolutely know the actual case of what is or what will be) talk about what, to the best of their limited knowledge, is or will be.

We know that we only imagine things to the best of our knowledge, but lo and behold, now WE KNOW FOR SURE.

From Agnostic to Islam and I have seen examples in the past... so my humble request to you is not to stop... keep learning or studying the new stuffs... an advice to you when you decide to study or learn about Islam — do not point to the people who does wrong things as wrong doing people are there in everywhere regardless of faith, but look into the scripture and go to someone who has knowledge if you have any question that bothers you but make sure that person is well educated to his community... i ask The Almighty God to open your heart...

the writer of this article is an idiot and he is not educated and does not have a brain because he has written it with out having any info about it.thats why little knowledge is dangerous.if he does nt know some thing then he is better off not writing things he does not know about

Most things are, but it is worse when the people doing it are so fervent in their «knowledge» of what is right and moral and good and the stakes they claim are involved.

I reviewed that book and said good things about it, but with the knowledge of what was going on behind the scenes in EV.

«The excessive segmentation of knowledge, the rejection of metaphysics by the human sciences, the difficulties encountered by dialogue between science and theology are damaging not only to the development of knowledge, but also to the development of peoples, because these things make it harder to see the integral good of man in its various dimensions.

The family resemblance consists in the idea that people do not need to know Jesus Christ to have some knowledge of what is right and good through the law of creation and conscience, that is, by way of «the things that have been made» (Romans 1:20).

and thus there is no possibility that the awesome variety of conflicting opinions about the things most important to human beings, including the best political order, can be transcended toward universal and objective knowledge.

= > Is Stephen Hawkings arrogant when he knows that one day science will find a unified theory = > I would think arrogance is in the manner of presentation of knowledge not the belief in Christ that allows me to know that all things work to the good of those who believe.

You led a good life and yet because somewhere else, someone you don't know and have no knowledge of did some bad things and because of that, you're punished, that seems CRAZY to me.

«His work in philosophy forms part, and a very important part, of the movement of twentieth - century realism; but whereas the other leaders of that movement came to it after a training in late - nineteenth - century idealism, and are consequently realistic with the fanaticism of converts and morbidly terrified of relapsing into the sins of their youth, a fact which gives their work an air of strain, as if they cared less about advancing philosophical knowledge than about proving themselves good enemies of idealism, Whitehead's work is perfectly free from all this sort of thing, and he suffers from no obsessions; obviously he does not care what he says, so long as it is true.

---- Al - Kahf 18: In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful Praise be to Allah Who hath revealed the Scripture unto His slave, and hath not placed therein any crookedness, (1)(But hath made it) straight, to give warning of stern punishment from Him, and to bring unto the believers who do good works the news that theirs will be a fair reward, (2) Wherein they will abide for ever; (3) And to warn those who say: Allah hath chosen a son, (4)(A thing) whereof they have no knowledge, nor (had) their fathers, Dreadful is the word that cometh out of their mouths.

It is one thing to defend plurality on the ground that no one can claim complete knowledge of the good and the true.

The naive concept of faith as blind assent arose from an equally naive and philosophically disreputable theory of knowledge, according to which one knows a thing best by detaching oneself from its use and setting aside personal biases in order to form an idea that corresponds to the thing.

If God is good (and the Torah taught us that He is), then it is good to labor diligently to deepen our knowledge of His entire created world, and all things in it.

Thus, for all he shows to the contrary, the only thing in our concept of human knowledge that derives from our direct intuition of God is the idea of totality or all - inclusiveness, just as he himself allows that we can very well experience «the inclusive something» without experiencing it as «an inclusive experience» (1948, 39f.).

To think of God as acting in dynamic relation to His creatures not merely as one actor among many, but as the universal creative power which sustains all things, and without which they could neither be nor act, is true to what our best knowledge of the world tells us.

What good is knowledge of all things if we have not love?

Both authors presume our intimate knowledge of pain and loss, but they assert that far better things await us, joys we can scarcely imagine.

in Our Knowledge of God [New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1939], p. 23, writes: «The doctrine of the imago dei has its basis in the fact that our existent human nature presents itself to us, not as a simply bad thing, but as a good thing spoiled.»

There are a lot of things I puzzle over in matters of doctrine and knowledge, but in the end I just have to trust God to the best of my limited knowledge.»

OK so we have a atheist with no dog in the fight that cant explain or understand a well rounded knowledge of things,, says they are altruistic,, so we know you lie,, I would say that pretty much sums up all atheists.

mweightinwords, I forgot your other question of how it relates to the topic here, well the prophesies confirm why these things are occurring, men wanting to marry men, and women marring women, in Jeremiah 50:37, and mayhem in our world, and other things while we are running to, and fro, with increased knowledge, Daniel 12:1 - 4.

When you all approach one another trying to beat each other to death with your «obviously superior» knowledge, we have a gift of the Internet and Freedom to discuss these things with respect and with the interest of bettering ourselves and everyone else.

In the first, things are said to be «good»; in the second, there is a tree of knowledge of good and bad, and man's aloneness is said to be «not good.»

And I assure you that my knowledge of biblical controversies is miniscule, but the one were discussing I have spent some time looking into, it's very intriguing to me that these things exist alongside each other... as I said earlier, John's gospel is a good example of historical detail (with respect to the synoptics) seemingly playing second fiddle to a developing narrative (the Johanine tradition).

Jeff: This is what causes division as we go about doing even good things, out of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil to set up another sect out of our carnal nature; above is the outcome; Jesus came to cause division among men that tries to become their own god and sets up camp, even for them that call themselves Christian, for them that have went from Him and His Words, even that are not of His Spirit: Jesus said; the Words that I speak are Spirit and Life, That means the Words of man can only bring forth death: Therefore; if we do not have His Spirit in us, then we too can only speak forth death: This is what it is to be a believer, we truly believe our Lord: I can see what the Catholic church and her daughters are doing to form a religious Babylonian city: Even as God caused a division in Babylon in the past because the peoples became great, so to is it now with all of the man made sects of religion: But when we are filled with the Spirit of God then we can not help but to live for God: It is written; those who are led by His spirit are His children: Thank - you Jeff: Those who are of His Spirit will know these truths, those who are not of His Spirit truly believe a believer is as they and can not know what we speak, because they live in unbelief: Thank - you again Jeff; In Jesus Name Alexandria: P.S..

«I think if you're looking to employ the best, you have to pay to get the services to have the best and I think fire - fighters, police - officers, paramedics, care workers, nurses - if they're going to do the service that we as a society are looking for them to do to the best of their ability we have to a - reward it, b - secure it and c - give them a life away from the service which gives them the comfort, security and knowledge that they're not having to worry about things which would drag them down.»

In its functioning, the clear character is an innate knowledge of the good as expressed in things, one's own mind and other things.

It seems that you know * all * about the good, joyful, pleasant things which you attribute to «God», but just simply plead no knowledge of the dark side.

Yet the knowledge that there were great people to rejoice in, a community where there was at least the promise of good things to come, makes all the difference at this juncture.

and also, googling information on the internet is not the same as finding it in the Scripture, though their is alot of good information giving knowledge on the Bible, it is not to be replaced with going to God's Word for truth, i still cant believe you are claiming to be a christian and you also claim that the Bible is not a Holy instrument of God, and that Paul speaks things that arent absolute truth, this is nonsense to any child of God.

Suffice it to say that the conceptuality which I accept — and accept because it seems to do justice to deep analysis of human experience and observation, as well as to the knowledge we now have of the way «things go» in the world — lays stress on the dynamic «event» character of that world; on the inter-relationships which exist in what is a societal universe, on the inadequacy of «substance» thinking to describe such a universe of «becoming» and «belonging», on the place of decisions in freedom by the creatures with the consequences which such decisions bring about, and on the central importance of persuasion rather than coercive force as a clue to the «going» of things in that universe.

He can handle the Knowledge of Good and evil because he sees forward, backward and sideways all the things of life that are good and eGood and evil because he sees forward, backward and sideways all the things of life that are good and egood and evil.

With the knowledge I have and for the love of all things healthy, I came up with is what I think the BEST Acai Bowl ever.

A verg good bread that it's not harmful at least with recent knowledge of us because before it I thought whole meal bread is really good for us and I was very proud to my healthy breakfast oats, raw honey and seeds but then they figured out that oats are not harmless I am wondering what is the next thing that will be deleted from my diet: -LRB-(Thank you very much for your good recipes

With all the years (okay, months) that had passed the frosting creator had more knowledge of frosting related things by now, so rather than recreate the exact same frosting she created an even better frosting!

With a knowledge of classic techniques and an understanding of how gluten works, do you think that these two things, together, improve our efforts in trying to mimic the results of gluten and lead us to better understand how gluten - free baking works?