Sentences with phrase «better model calibration»

An equatorial volcano occurring during that period would allow much better model calibration, for example, settling questions about transient climate response.

Not exact matches

Would original authors — whose approach was known good — agree with having someone else crank through their same procedure after the «datasets and / or calibrations and / or age models» were changed?

«They told us that as good as Veloster is, the suspension calibration and especially the new powertrain of the turbo model screamed for even more outright grip to satisfy enthusiast buyers.

«It runs on regular gasoline, but if you put in premium it has adaptive calibration that will give you even better mid-range torque,» Barnes said, adding that Easy Fuel ™, Ford's innovative capless fuel system, is standard on all models.

All new Chevy Corvette C7 models can now be equipped with new performance suspension calibrations that will make driving the new sports cars in Kansas City even better.

display performance improvements in the new Galaxy S6 models, including higher resolution, higher absolute color accuracy, better calibration, higher peak brightness, better screen visibility and readability in high ambient light, and higher display power efficiency, resulting in a number of new performance records for Smartphone displays.

Our detailed series of DisplayMate Lab tests that are listed below show that there are many significant display performance improvements in the new Galaxy S6 models, including higher resolution, higher absolute color accuracy, better calibration, higher peak brightness, better screen visibility and readability in high ambient light, and higher display power efficiency, resulting in a number of new performance records for Smartphone displays.

Our detailed lab tests show that there have been significant display performance improvements in the new Note models including higher resolution, higher absolute color accuracy with better calibration, higher peak brightness with improved screen visibility and readability in high ambient light, and higher display power efficiency, resulting in a number of new records for smartphone display performance.

The colours produced are a bit saturated but the new software allows for some better screen calibration options compared to the previous model.

This model is a simple and intuitive valuation - dependent model, as illustrated by the log - linear line of best fit in Figure 1.3 At each point in time, we calibrate the model only to the historically observed data available at that time; no look - ahead information is in the model calibration.

I believe that statisticians can contribute more to climate sciences in better description of the uncertainties, in addition to better calibration of statistical models.

At monthly timescales (which should not be affected by trends in the model or possible drifts or calibration problems in the satellites or radiosondes) there is a very good match.

Such improved precision would allow close study of decade scale fluctuations in surface temperature that can lead to much better calibration of climate models.

First, better calibrations of satellite data and better methods for the optimal combination of earth measurements, satellite estimates, and model outputs may provide a better understanding of precipitation.

One of these models is extrapolated from its 2000 calibration end date and shows a good match to the satellite data, with a projection of continued cooling for several more decades.»

-------- http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/1/014013 Predictability of twentieth century sea - level rise from past data However, in combination, the use of proxy and tide gauge sea - level data up to 1900 AD allows a good prediction of twentieth century sea - level rise, despite this rise being well outside the rates experienced in previous centuries during the calibration period of the model.

The NSRDB accounts for any recent climate changes and provides more accurate values of solar radiation due to a better model for estimating values (more than 90 percent of the solar radiation data in both data bases are modeled), more measured data including direct normal radiation, improved instrument calibration methods, and rigorous procedures for assessing quality of data.

I object to the idea that we can detect AGW using that a model that only provides good results during the calibration period and not during the verification period.

One technique to demonstrate credibility is by assessing how well the statistical model does on data that was not used in the calibration.

Would original authors — whose approach was known good — agree with having someone else crank through their same procedure after the «datasets and / or calibrations and / or age models» were changed?

If a model, say, a paleo reconstruction, gives you a completely bad output in exactly the best years it had to show that it worked well against actual thermometers (despite the calibration years), it destroys the credibility of the whole reconstruction.

I might add that in the situation described (a 3MPH violation, thus presumably a radar ticket) it would be a good idea to subpoena the radar gun specifications (to check the model's margin of error), its maintenance record (to check for any history of malfunction or drift), and possibly to cross-examine the citing officer regarding its calibration.