Not exact matches
State lawmakers earlier this year agreed to a package of education policy changes that linked test
scores to evaluations as
well as in - classroom
observation and made it more difficult for teachers to obtain tenure.
But in recent weeks, Cuomo has indicated he will begin to emphasize a new direction in education after a legislative session that saw yet more changes to the state's teacher evaluation system that linked performance reviews to tenure as
well as student test
scores and in - classroom
observation.
This recommendation was rooted in an earlier
observation by Williams et al, 19 based on both priority
scores and funding rates, that clinical grant applications do not fare as
well in the review process when evaluated by study sections reviewing relatively few clinical applications.
In addition, our analysis does not compare value added with other measures of teacher quality, like evaluations based on classroom
observation, which might be even
better predictors of teachers» long - term impacts than VA
scores.
But test
score gains plus
observation scores might be a
better look at «
good teaching.»
Even if
observation scores are completely uncorrelated with test
score gains, parents and communities might prefer that teachers
score well on them.
Even
better, they were hoping that the combination of classroom
observations, student surveys, and previous test
score gains would be a much
better predictor of future test
score gains (or of future classroom
observations) than any one of those measures alone.
MET could have allayed those concerns by telling teachers that test
score gains produce information that is generally similar to what is learned from
well - conducted classroom
observations, so there is no reason to oppose one and support the other.
In a nutshell, she points out that the MET study asked whether actual
observation of teaching, student surveys, or VAM test
score measures did a
better job of predicting future student test
score growth, which «privileges» test
scores by using it both as a variable being tested and as the outcome reflecting gains.
Not surprisingly, a composite teacher evaluation measure that mixes classroom
observations and student survey results with test
score gains is generally no
better and sometimes much worse at predicting out of sample test
score gains.
In a way, teachers have always used data to track how
well students are doing, but the data points were largely anecdotal — a pop quiz
score, a casual teacher
observation.
The AFT and the state education department have only agreed that classroom
observations — which, even under the
best of circumstances, are far less reliable in measuring student performance than either value - added analysis of student test
score performance or even surveys of students — should be the «majority» element in the new evaluation system.
«Combining
observation scores, student feedback, and student achievement gains was
better than graduate degrees or years of teaching experience at predicting a teacher's student achievement gains with another group of students on the state tests».
The new system will rate teachers by looking at student test
score data, as
well as the
scores teachers receive from
observations conducted by administrators.
Another issue that has cropped up in both D.C. and Memphis is how
well the teacher ratings based on classroom
observations match the student test -
score data that make up the other half of a teacher's overall rating.
A report by Regional Educational Laboratory (REL) Mid-Atlantic provides new evidence to help educators choose among five widely used «off - the shelf» teacher
observation instruments and decide how much weight to attach to
scores on different Read more about Choosing the
Best Teacher
Observation Instrument -LSB-...]
Contrary to our expectation, both the mean
scores and pass rates suggest that the less - complex guided video viewing condition led to
better performance on the written classroom
observation test by this group of early - stage teacher education students.
Teachers will also be judged on students» California High School Exit Exam
scores, API
scores, graduation and dropout rates as
well as classroom
observation.
Such an adjustment for the makeup of the class is already factored into teachers» value - added
scores; it should be factored into classroom
observation scores as
well.
My paper in the American Journal of Education, The Stability of Observational and Student Survey Measures of Teaching Effectiveness, uses data from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation's Measures of Effective Teaching study to investigate this issue, looking at the year - to - year stability of several
well known and widely - used observational and student survey measures (the Framework for Teaching, the Classroom Assessment
Scoring System, the Protocol for Language Arts Teaching
Observations, the Mathematical Quality of Instruction instrument, and the Tripod student survey).
And experiments aside, we have
scores of empirical
observations of rising temperatures, tropospheric lapse rates, energy flux measurements at the top of the atmosphere, modelling experiments,
observations of other planetary bodies (Venus is an excellent example of what happens when CO2 concentrations rise
well beyond the point of spectral saturation) that all support the greenhouse theory of atmospheres.
The following aspects of the BIQ - SF were subjected to a psychometric evaluation: (a) the hypothesized six - correlated factors structure of the scale was tested by means of a confirmatory factor analysis, (b) various types of reliability were investigated including the internal consistency, test — retest reliability, and cross-informant agreement, and (c) several aspects of the validity were explored such as the relations with anxiety and internalizing (i.e., convergent validity) and externalizing (i.e., divergent validity) symptoms as
well as the relations between BIQ - SF
scores of parents and teachers and laboratory
observations of an inhibited temperament (i.e., predictive validity).