If daycare is better for children than staying home with Mommy, this means that total strangers make
better parents than the child's natural parents!
The humanistic, pleasure - seeking, materialistic society in which we live today repeatedly broadcasts the messages that women need to find fulfillment and financial independence in the workplace and that paid caregivers make
better parents than a child's own mother.
Not exact matches
«
Parents who respond to their children's emotions in a comforting manner have kids who are more socially well - adjusted than do parents who either tell their kids they are overreacting or who punish their kids for getting upset,» child psychologist Nancy Eisenberg of Arizona State University said in an int
Parents who respond to their
children's emotions in a comforting manner have kids who are more socially
well - adjusted
than do
parents who either tell their kids they are overreacting or who punish their kids for getting upset,» child psychologist Nancy Eisenberg of Arizona State University said in an int
parents who either tell their kids they are overreacting or who punish their kids for getting upset,»
child psychologist Nancy Eisenberg of Arizona State University said in an interview.
Productivity — the ability to eke out sustained gains in wages and profits — is the thing that determines whether you have a
better standard of living
than your
parents, whether your
children live more comfortably
than you.
The change could affect the more
than 4 million US citizen
children under 18 who live with at least one undocumented
parent, as
well as the approximately 1 million more so - called «dreamers» who were brought the US by their
parents as
children and remain undocumented.
That expert also said, «The
good news is that
parents know more about
child development
than ever before.»
Drive - thrus are valuable to the elderly, the immobile,
parents with small
children and, believe it or not, are actually
better for the environment
than cars in parking lots — or so says TDL, the
parent company of Tim Hortons.
Parents want nothing but the
best for their
children, and if you come to them earnestly looking for help, you'll likely find that they'll be more
than willing to do so.
As
parents, you think the
best thing you can do for your
children is to encourage them to go to college and get a
good education — and, hopefully, that will help them land
good jobs with higher earning power
than if they had high school diplomas alone.
More questions
than answers; however, each individual should assess what their capabilities are fiscally, emotionally, etc. and ascertain their likelihood of being a
good parent whose
child can and will CONTRIBUTE TO SOCIETY (those being the key words).
Some of them, maybe most, will have at least one
parent or another relative who could take care of them, though the adults sometimes tried to hide that from us; they figure we will take
better care of the
children than they can, plus they won't have another mouth to feed.
Two
parents can be Mom and Dad, Mom and Mom, Dad and Dad... studies prove that
children do just as
well in same gender homes
than they do in hetero homes (the link to the study is listed above in response to another blathering of yours).
Rather, the
parent did an awful job and if the
child turned out
well, it was for some other reason
than the
parent's efforts.
Parents deposit their two - and three - year - olds for hours at a variety of day - care centers despite voluminous research indicating that there are no «
good»
child - care arrangements for
children of this age other
than parental care.
Some family law scholars are now insisting that a
child can have more
than two legal
parents, to «
better reflect the dynamics of the modern family.»
This vision of childhood, in which the role of
parents is to trust
children and the role of
children is to keep that trust, to be honest and
good and, above all, not duffers, is to me a purer, sweeter, and infinitely more potent vision
than any other a
child is likely to encounter in literature.
Parents are
better at equipping their
children to grow up achievers
than they are at equipping them to grow up Christian.
Assertions that heterosexual couples are inherently
better parents than same sex couples, or that the
children of lesbian or gay
parents fare worse
than children of heterosexual
parents, have no support in the scientific research literature.
Furthermore, while an intact family composed of two
parents of the opposite sex and their biological
child or
children may provide the
best standard family unit in society (and should, therefore, be given support), we would be naive and cruel to dismiss the possibility that differently configured families (e.g., families with single
parents or homosexual
parents or adopted
children) may produce family situations that are as
good as, or, in some cases,
better than, those of families that fit the standard.
Our point is that on the whole the nuclear mother - father team in intact first marriages does a
better job of raising
children than do single
parents, stepparents or unmarried couples.
Religion and morality are NOT synonymous, but unfortunately that fallacy is perpetuated and passed on from
parent to
child as the
parent subjects their
child to the same brainwashing indoctrination they themselves suffered through as a
child and who now actually think that what they believe is actually what THEY believe, rather
than what somebody else believed and told them they must as
well, or else.
The
child's teachers are not likely to know this
better than the
parents.
If a devoted gay couple wants to raise
children together, then you'd think that the
children would be
better off
than those from the single
parent, divorced
parents households that are common.
In every area - education, law - abidingness, health, and life chances generally -
children raised in two -
parent families do dramatically
better than others.
Parents are urged to develop an atmosphere of mutual respect; to communicate on levels of fun and recreation as well as on discipline and advice; to allow a child to learn «through natural consequences» — that is, by experiencing what happens when he dawdles in the morning and is permitted to experience the unpleasantness and embarrassment of being late to school; to encourage the child and spend time with him playing and learning (positively) rather than spending time lecturing and disciplining (negatively), since the child who is misbehaving is often merely craving attention and if he gets it in pleasant, constructive ways, he will not demand it in antisocial ways; to avoid trying to put the child in a mold of what the parent thinks he should do and be, or what other people think he should do and be, rather than what his natural gifts and tendencies indicate; to take time to train the child in basic skills — to bake a cake, pound a nail, sketch or write or play a melody — including those things the parents know and do well and are interes
Parents are urged to develop an atmosphere of mutual respect; to communicate on levels of fun and recreation as
well as on discipline and advice; to allow a
child to learn «through natural consequences» — that is, by experiencing what happens when he dawdles in the morning and is permitted to experience the unpleasantness and embarrassment of being late to school; to encourage the
child and spend time with him playing and learning (positively) rather
than spending time lecturing and disciplining (negatively), since the
child who is misbehaving is often merely craving attention and if he gets it in pleasant, constructive ways, he will not demand it in antisocial ways; to avoid trying to put the
child in a mold of what the
parent thinks he should do and be, or what other people think he should do and be, rather
than what his natural gifts and tendencies indicate; to take time to train the
child in basic skills — to bake a cake, pound a nail, sketch or write or play a melody — including those things the
parents know and do well and are interes
parents know and do
well and are interested in.
Say: «Come, let me convey unto you what G - D has [really] forbidden to you: «Do not ascribe divinity, in any way, to anything (or anyone) beside HIM; and [do not offend against but, rather,] do
good unto your
parents; and do not kill your
children (born or unborn) for fear of poverty --[for] it is WE who shall provide sustenance for you as
well as for them; and do not commit any shameful deeds, be they open or secret; and do not take any human being's life -[the life] which G - D has declared to be sacred - otherwise
than in [the pursuit of] justice: this has HE enjoined upon you so that you might use your reason; and do not touch the substance of an orphan — except to improve it - before he comes of age.»
By God's own teaching, his plan required that his creations, having free will, yet no appreciation of hardship or adversary, must, like all
children do as they move from innocence to adulthood, think that they know
better than there
parents and elders and break seemingly arbitrary rules.
Assertions that heterose xual couples are inherently
better parents than same se x couples, or that the
children of lesbian or gay
parents fare worse
than children of heterose xual
parents, have no support in the scientific research literature.
One perhaps could argue that the 17 average hours that
parents spent with their
children per week in 1985 could have been quality time and therefore just as
good as, or even
better than, the greater number of hours they spent together in 1965.
, two -
parent families are
better for
children than single -
parent families.
Consider the tremendous response to the Atlantic article (April 1993) in which Barbara Dafoe Whitehead argued that the two -
parent family is
better on the whole for
child - rearing
than are single
parents and stepfamilies.
If
good parents are not evil for deliberately bringing
children into this world and inevitably having to discipline them in some fashion or another then neither is God (who is
better than any earthly
parent could ever be) for creating man.
Those already married, as
well as those meaning to marry, could ask themselves no more important question
than this: are our
children — will our
children be — really grateful for what they receive from us, their
parents?
He said: «A decade on from the passing of the controversial anti-smacking law in New Zealand, the law has maintained its very high level of opposition, but most significantly the law has had a «chilling» effect on
parenting, and rather
than tackling rotten
parents who are abusing their
children, it has targeted
well - functioning
parents».
Parents correcting their
children is the right thing to do to get them on the right track, but we ASSUME that the
parent knows
better than the
child and is right.
Christian
children who aren't taught
better than to judge by their
parents?
While
children of gay and lesbian
parents don't «become gay» any more
than children of heterose.xuals, daughters of lesbian couples do display one very different behavior: They play
better with male
children and have more gender - neutral views of society.
Do you believe that
children are
better left to be raised by the government
than by a family (whether it's one
parent or two same gendered
parents) that love them?
It's really funny how
children sometimes are much more grown up
than adults (their
parents) and can handle new situations
better than them.
William Carson (Nemo) Herrera was a fronterizo, a
child of the borderland like his players, and he probably knew them
better than their
parents did.
As Nick Clegg denounces «Edwardian» work attitudes, FI tells
parenting «experts» to move out of the 1950s The Fatherhood Institute is calling for a major new resource for new
parents to be redesigned to reflect the reality of modern families — and powerful evidence that
children do
best when they are securely attached to more
than one caring adult.
Well - off kids have on average more access to books and other printed materials; just as important, their
parents speak to them more
than low - income
parents speak to their
children — by some estimates, far more — and the speech they use is more complex.
As a
parent, you know your
child better than anyone in the world.
Stop bashing young dads — and support them to help their
children The Fatherhood Institute calls on government - funded services aimed at supporting
parents to identify and support young fathers as
well as young mothers, rather
than dismiss them as «feckless» and reduce their role to that of cash providers.
I know she would want nothing
better for her birthday
than to help
parents be supported in their attachment with their
children.
In many situations, court decisions are made on the basis of what is» «fair and equitable» to each
parent rather
than what is
best for the
child.
«My concern is that there could be more
than just a
good bond with
parents, where [the
children] are «tied» to their
parents.»
• If one
parent is
better - educated
than the other, some
children may benefit from the
better - educated
parent undertaking more care: e.g. in Norway, girls (but not boys) have been found to do
better at school when a father who was
better educated
than their mother took longer -
than - average leave (Cools et al, 2011.)
When labels are applied to anything as complex as all of the choices and love and anguish that go into being a
parent, that role is immediately trivialized and for some frightening reason
parenting is converting into following a set of rules (or «principles») rather
than living in the moment, responding to your
child and doing the
best you can with what you've got.
The sheer ridiculousness of the comments you refer to is freaking hilarious... because obviously these people either a) don't have kids themselves, in which case they have no business intimating that they would make a
better parent than you, or b) do, in fact, have
children, but SPEND ALL OF THEIR TIME READING BLOGS THAT THEY CAN MAKE DEROGATORY COMMENTS ON INSTEAD OF BONDING WITH THEIR C
children, but SPEND ALL OF THEIR TIME READING BLOGS THAT THEY CAN MAKE DEROGATORY COMMENTS ON INSTEAD OF BONDING WITH THEIR
CHILDRENCHILDREN.