«The study provides more realistic modeling estimates of how much vegetation change will occur over the 21st century and will allow
better predictions of future climate change,» she said.
Not exact matches
A step that could improve
climate models A
better understanding
of how the atmosphere and the oceans communicate and exchange things like CO2 can also help improve
climate models and
predictions of the
future.
«A
better understanding
of the controls on reef development in the past will allow us to make
better predictions about which reefs may be most vulnerable to
climate change in the
future.»
The more data we have about what's happened across millions
of years
of climate, the
better our
predictions of the
future will be.»
A
better understanding
of aerosols then may
well facilitate more accurate
predictions of future climate responses to changing CO2.
The uncertainty in aerosol forcing looks unsettling, but this is a
good example
of the case where one needs to ask: What are the consequences
of this uncertainty for our
predictions of future climate?
The 1988 GISS
climate model included volcanic forcing as
well as a
prediction of what would happen in the
future if a large tropical volcano went boom.
Since this goes along with an increasing greenhouse effect and a further global warming, a
better understanding
of the carbon cycle is
of great importance for all
future climate change
predictions.
These are all things that
climate change model should take into account to arrive at
better predictions of the
future, but the full effects
of this nitrogen fertilization aren't yet entirely clear.
Better understanding of the effect of aerosols on Earth's climate in the past can help climate scientist make better predictions of climate change trends in the future, the researchers
Better understanding
of the effect
of aerosols on Earth's
climate in the past can help
climate scientist make
better predictions of climate change trends in the future, the researchers
better predictions of climate change trends in the
future, the researchers said.
in three subjects — computation, mathematics and physics (and I mean this literally — it is listed twice in this page devoted primarily to computational physics grand challenges, Navier - Stokes is one
of the grand challenges in mathematics with a substantial prize, and both classical and quantum chaos, self - organizing phenomena and complexity in general are grand challenges in physics (all present in the single problem
of understanding the
climate well enough to compute meaningful
predictions of future climate)-- it seems both unlikely that this science will be «settled» soon, nor is it at all unreasonable that it is not settled at this point in time.
Yet some kind
of climate model is indispensable to make
future predictions of the
climate system and IPCC has identified several reasons for respect in the
climate models including the fact that models are getting
better in predicting what monitoring evidence is actually observing around the world in regard to temperature, ice and snow cover, droughts and floods, and sea level rise among other things.
The reason I wondered about a
prediction, is that in the film they talk about the past
climate changes, if they are so certain that their interpretation on past
climate is correct for the past, then sureley a
prediction for the
future would be a
good test
of their interpretation.
«The large - scale winds would look
better because the release
of latent heat drives a lot
of those winds, and
climate sensitivity would be
better constrained because not only is the base state highly dependent on convective parameterization but the model
predictions for
future climate change are also very sensitive to that as
well.»
-- Muller believes humans are changing
climate with CO2 emissions — humans have been responsible for «most»
of a 0.4 C warming since 1957, almost none
of the warming before then — IPCC is in trouble due to sloppy science, exaggerated
predictions; chairman will have to resign — the «Climategate» mails were not «hacked» — they were «leaked» by an insider — due to «hide the decline» deception, Muller will not read any
future papers by Michael Mann — there has been no increase in hurricanes or tornadoes due to global warming — automobiles are insignificant in overall picture — China is the major CO2 producer, considerably more than USA today — # 1 priority for China is growth
of economy — global warming is not considered important — China CO2 efficiency (GDP per ton CO2) is around one - fourth
of USA today, has much room for improvement — China growth will make per capita CO2 emissions at same level as USA today by year 2040 — if it is «not profitable» it is «not sustainable» — US energy
future depends on shale gas for automobiles; hydrogen will not be a factor — nor will electric cars, due to high cost — Muller is upbeat on nuclear (this was recorded pre-Fukushima)-- there has been no warming in the USA — Muller was not convinced
of Hansen's GISS temperature record; hopes
BEST will provide a
better record.
In an article on «the perils
of confirmation bias,» published for the Global Warming Policy Foundation (a group firmly opposed to policies that counteract
climate change), Ridley suggested that «governments should fund groups that intend to explore alternative hypotheses about the likely
future of climate as
well as those that explore the dangerous man - made
climate change
prediction.»
However, forecasts
of how ENSO might behave in the
future are complicated by a host
of interactions between the ocean and atmosphere, and
better climate models are needed before scientists can arrive at such
predictions, he added.
Until we do, we can not make
good predictions about
future climate change... Over the last several hundred thousand years,
climate change has come mainly in discrete jumps that appear to be related to changes in the mode
of thermohaline circulation.»
The results, published today by the Proceedings
of the National Academy
of Sciences, will help
climate scientists
better constrain
future predictions of the ocean's relentless rise — as global warming progresses.
If the researchers can understand how specific regions
of the earth are impacted when the
climate changes, and how the changes in those regions impact other parts
of the globe, they can make
better predictions of how the planet will respond to
future climate change events.
At that time (and particularly the early to mid 70's)
climate science was ambiguous about predicting the
future, although the 1975 NAS report summarised the state
of the science pretty
well: that we didn't know enough to make useful
predictions and needed to study more.
The coal and oil companies, as
well as the oil - producing nations, argue that the computerized
climate models are crude and approximate, incomplete, inconclusive, and so flawed that their
predictions of future climate change can not be used as a basis for taking action.
Indeed, working with
predictions for
future temperature increases and glacier melt rates generated by ten separate global
climate models — all of which are also used by the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change - the team have concluded that these smaller ice sources will contribute around 12 centimetres to world sea - level increases over the remainder of the century, with this likely to have catastrophic consequences for numerous natural habitats as well as for hundreds of thousands of
climate models — all
of which are also used by the Intergovernmental Panel
of Climate Change - the team have concluded that these smaller ice sources will contribute around 12 centimetres to world sea - level increases over the remainder of the century, with this likely to have catastrophic consequences for numerous natural habitats as well as for hundreds of thousands of
Climate Change - the team have concluded that these smaller ice sources will contribute around 12 centimetres to world sea - level increases over the remainder
of the century, with this likely to have catastrophic consequences for numerous natural habitats as
well as for hundreds
of thousands
of people.
Better climate predictions over timescales
of weeks to decades will help key sectors such as agriculture, water management, health and energy plan for and adapt to the
future.»