Sentences with phrase «better read text»

Those systems work best reading text rather than fancy formatting.

Not exact matches

If you want to keep track of 3,000 texts on oncology, well, I can't read that many.

(Judging from the Kickstarter page, this app is a tad aggressive: «Good morning Chris, your body clock is now out of sync by 56 minutes,» a sample text reads.

It's almost impossible to get a good read on how a person is feeling through text.

«Users don't read most of the copy, so it's a good rule of thumb to repeat yourself and include help text on every single page.

Large blocks of text are hard to read, so it's better to break emails into short paragraphs, Haefner says.

Copywriter Salaries Copywriting Examples Start Learning Copy Now Copywriting Tools Consulting As A Side Job How To Become A Copywriter Make a Copywriting Portfolio Copywriting Books and Courses Freelance Writing for Beginners Swipe File Copywriting Guides: The State of Copywriting 2018 Direct Mail Marketing Guide One Pager Examples Sell Me This Pen Leading Questions Why Use Images vs Text How To Write A Brochure Headlines That Sell Using Ear Plugs To Write Writing Guides Three Tiered Pricing Different Pricing Examples How To Make A PDF Billboard Advertising Guide Write an AirBnB Description How to Write a SWOT Analysis Job Interview Questions How to Write a Memo How to Write a Testimonial Make Money Licensing Music How to Create a Tagline Work From Home Successfully LinkedIn Recommendations Choosing The Right Photos How to Start A Conversation How to Sell Art Online How To Become A Life Coach Best Business Podcasts Tone of Voice in Copywriting Workplace Communication Skills Power & Trigger Words For Sales Content Marketing Guides: Writing Advertorials Easiest Font to Read How To Write A Follow Up Email Cold Email Like A Boss S&P 500 Company Slogan Effective Sales Letters How to Write a Newsletter How to Write an About Page How to Get Your Posts Seen Making A Content Mill Real Estate Flyers Get First Photography Job Email Open Rate Examples Content Writing vs Copywriting Become A Famous YouTuber Story Arcs for Content Marketing Copywriter Mentality: Writers Block Copywriting Quotes Psychology of Marketing Taking a Workcation to Think Health / Wealth / Love Test How to Interview Someone Get a Job or Start a Business?

Well, after reading the whole text you deserve a REWARD!

Crawlers read the anchor text, as well as the words around it.

Here's the text of GATA's two - page advertisement to be published Thursday, December 9, in Roll Call, the weekly newspaper that covers the Congress of the United States and is considered the best - read publication at the U.S. Capitol.

Owen Fiss urges judges to avoid an «arid and artificial» focus upon the words and original meaning of constitutional provisions by instead reading «the moral as well as the legal text» of the Constitution.

As your attention focuses on the reading — raising the book as you read reveals your focus — the text you hold will become the congregation's center of attention as well.

I actually love reading RIchard Dawkins, but I also love reading passages from religious text as well.

The idea that religious texts are a kind of «instruction manual» and all you have to do is just read it and the truth becomes plainly obvious used to be well outside the mainstream of religious thought.

When the Bible is quoted literally, it might be well for the one quoting to read the text in its entirety.

Probably should've read the text as well - «some shepherds.»

The Consultation recognized that reading from other scriptures during Christian worship may well be beneficial, provided it is not done to criticise those to whom the text belongs nor misused out of context to support Christian claims.

In theological studies, however, I frequently encounter people who read a text of Scripture that seems difficult to them and their preconceived ideas of what should be in the Bible, and when they read these troublesome texts, they jump straight to the conclusion that best fits their current theological system.

There are, of course, also many literary treasures of spirituality, for example even today we may well recommend reading St. Augustine) St. John of the Cross, Teresa of Avila or any well - edited selection of mystical texts.

Progressive religious folks of all stripes tend to share a post-triumphalism (a sense that it's time to move beyond the old triumphalist paradigm in which one religion is The Right Path to God and all the other paths are wrong), as well as an inclination toward reading our sacred texts through interpretive lenses which take into account changing social mores and changing understandings of justice.

It is a well - established rule of interpretation that one should read symbolic or unclear texts in the light of texts that are non-symbolic and clear, not the other way around.

Well, just as you think I am not reading certain OT texts at face value, I think you are ignoring much of what these NT texts are saying, and not just these passages, but the whole tenor and focus of the ministry of Jesus.

Yet when we read her powerful interpretations many of us find that she has shown us something in the texts we had not seen before, but which we will not be able to ignore on future readings and which gives us a better understanding of what we read.

The reading pleasure that results from this conversation — different for different readers — is not merely the simple pleasure of hearing a good story, but the complex pleasures of strong feelings — sometimes violent disagreement, sometimes frustration and sometimes a euphoric recognition, produced by Augustine's text, of the «beauty so ancient and so new,» to which Augustine points through the beauty of his prose.

A new translation of a classic text provides an occasion for reading a well - thumbed favorite afresh.

It used to be that you could trump somebody's exegesis of the text by saying, «Well, although the English says X, in the Greek it says Y...» But then it began to be that this was no longer good enough, for you had to go back further and say, «Well, although the Greek text you are using says Y, the variant reading from Papyrus 46 says Z, and it is preferable for reasons A, B, and C.

While I appreciate the approach that DTS teaches, it can really only be followed by expert scholars and theologians, and is not feasible for the average student of Scripture, which indicates to me that it is not the only oven the best way of reading and interpreting the biblical text.

This helps make sense of verse 8 as well, so that rather than it saying that Jesus» ultimate humiliation was «even death on a cross» (NAS), the text should read «especially death on a cross.»

If our critical readings lead us away from trusting the grace of God in Jesus Christ, then something is amiss, and we would do well to interrogate the methods and presuppositions that have taught us to distance ourselves arrogantly or fearfully from the text and to miss scripture's gracious word of promise.

It allowed me to reconceptualize the study of «women in the Bible,» by moving from what men have said about women to a feminist historical reconstruction of early Christian origins as well as by articulating a feminist critical process for reading and evaluating androcentric biblical texts.

Many teachers and Bible scholars have noted, however, that a better way of reading this text is not to say that although Jesus was God He came to earth to suffer and die, but rather, since Jesus was God He came to earth to suffer and die.

Since this analogy gives Cobb's defense of the Hartshornian interpretation of God a good deal of the persuasiveness that it has, it is very important to recognize that the analogy is highly suspect since it is based upon a questionable reading of the Whiteheadian texts.

-- Michael P. Steinberg A new translation of a classic text provides an occasion for reading a well - thumbed favorite afresh.

The best way to get students to do the reading is to have them write text - based papers.

While some try to explain away what James is writing about by saying that it does not actually refer to someone who is physically sick, but instead someone who is spiritually or emotionally weak, I think it is best to go with the traditional and most common way of reading this text and see it as a a reference to physical sickness.

Father White's brilliant reading of one of the foundational texts of Western civilization is well - introduced by series editor R. R. Reno, in a preface that should be required reading for anyone doing serious study of the Bible.

Once I had gathered this important information from a study of the context of the passage, I was better able to serve the occasion of reading the text in the conference setting.

A well - prepared reading is one that is free of breaks in the listener's concentration on the text as it is read.

Mikics argues that, in contrast to most of the fast reading that we do, we also need to learn to read slowly and to ask good questions of the texts we read.

Have a piece of paper handy when you start to prepare a text for oral reading, or better still, keep a journal or notebook for developing your impressions of the texts you select.

Is this text best presented as a solo reading?

By reading this book, you will gain a better understanding of what the text means when it says that God hardened Pharaoh's heart and that God loved Jacob but hated Esau.

In any event, a careful reading of the text suggests that the counterculture thesis is only the best of a variety of rather weak statistically grounded «explanations» of the trends.

The ODF, however, knows full well that the text will be widely read by non-Catholics.

@jf well your information about the New Testament is about as accurate as your Old Testament knowledge, The prophecies of the Old testament concerning Christ could not have been written after the fact because we now have the Dead Sea Scrolls, with an almost complete Old Testament dated 100 - 200 years before the birth of Christ, Your interpretation of God at His worst shows a complete lack of understanding as to what was being communicated.We don't know what the original texts of the New Testament were written in as to date there are no original copies available.Greek was the common language of the day.Most of the gospels were reported written somewhere in the 30 year after Christs resurrection time frame, not the unspecified «long after «you reference and three of the authors knew Jesus personally in His earthly ministry, the other Knew Jesus as his savior and was in the company of many who also knew Jesus.You keep referencing changes, «gazillion «was the word used but you never referenced one change, so it is assumed we are to take your word for it.What may we ask are your credentials?Try reading Job your own self, particularly the section were Job says «My ears had heard of you but now my eyes have seen you.Therefore I despise myself and repent in dust and ashes»

Changing Our Mind by David Gushee:: I have had this book by one of evangelicalism's leading conservative ethicisits (he wrote the best - selling text Kingdom Ethics) and his shift on GLBTQ theology for a while but just finally read it.

J.I. Packer probably is a good representation of the historic view: «Reference to a second blessing has to be read into the [biblical] text; it can not be read out of it.»

Working through the biblical account step by step, Ellul reads the text carefully, finding hints of how God works through people, those who are faithful, as well as those who are not.

In reading a text like the Bible, one is well aware of its special authority and its peculiar way of questioning us.

Personally, I think this way of reading the text is way better than most of the alternatives, and is way better than the most common way of reading the Bible, which depicts God has a blood - thirsty, murderous tyrant intent on killing babies and committing genocide.