Not exact matches
Watford have one of the
best shots - to - goals
conversion ratios in the league, so we'd
better get it right defensively, or we're going to have a bad result this weekend.
The Uruguay international has scored more goals (25 to 12), enjoyed a
better shot accuracy (57 to 54 per cent) and a
better conversion rate (28 to 16 per cent) from a higher number of
shots per game (3.8 to 3).
And check your fact, he is very
good squad player not deadwood, his
conversion rate goal /
shots is
better than Giroud.
bonus facts lacazette has 6 goals with 22
shots = 27 %
conversion rate,
better than kane and ramsey is having a
good season both attack and defense, at this rate will finish with 10 goal and 10 assist and 2.8 interception / tackles per match.
His
shot accuracy of 70 per cent is
better than ever before, while his
conversion rate of 23 per cent has also increased.
Still, this could see Arsenal lose one of their
best goalscorers, with Podolski's
shot conversion rate very impressive,
better than anyone else at the club since 2012.
Through the first leg of league fixtures, the club has put 47 % of their
shots on target,
good for only sixth in the league, while their collective 12 %
conversion rate is right up there with Juventus» 13 %... it was hard to find a reliable database for this particular stat, but as far as I could tell, Roma was among the
better sides.
Toss in his 57 %
shooting accuracy, 14 % chance
conversion rate, and an early season goal to
better see the youngster's clinical nature in the final third.
Of course,
shooting accuracy and chance
conversion stats are strongly dependant on opposition players» form, but you have to take it into consideration that a
good defending always makes it harder to take a proper
shot, that's why I've decided to include those stats.
The Hull match shows very little with only one
shot which was blocked from Sterling compared to the three
shots against Spurs, with a
shot accuracy of 50 % and a chance
conversion rate of 50 % as
well.
The smackdown sequences are especially masochistic, though Bay and cinematographer Jonathan Sela
shot most of the picture on IMAX digital cameras, in 3D, so it looks
better than the average postproduction 3 - D
conversion job.
While not as
good as the
best live - action
shot in 3D films, it might be the
best full - length
conversion I've seen (the 20 minutes converted for Harry Potter 5 in Imax looked incredible but I hear it is much harder to do full - length films), and if you are gonna see it you should probably go in 3D, which is not always the case with 2D
conversions or animated films.
Yes, J.J. Abrams will
shoot the film in 2D, but he told MTV News, «We're
shooting on film, 2D, and then we'll do a
good high - end
conversion like the Harry Potter movie and all that.»
Top Gun does have a surprisingly
good 3D
conversion and in general only 2 films I saw in 3D in recent times (1 - 2 years) were incredibly underwhelming (The Amazing Spiderman which is flatter than paper, strange considering the fact that it was
shot in 3D and Dial M For Murder which isn't that bad but I still can't believe it's the
best version out there).
We see Aston Martin DB6
shooting brake
conversions from time to time — at least in auction catalogs — and the odd Lagonda station wagon
conversion gives us a
good jolt every time we suddenly come...