Sentences with phrase «better signal to noise»

This is delivering a better signal to noise ratio and includes a more powerful amp than the Galaxy S7 or the built in DAC on the LG G5.

«It allowed us to go from imaging at one frame per minute to 30 frames per second with a good signal to noise ratio,» says Saar.

Not exact matches

Such advice comes as no surprise to readers of Fried's 15 years of posts on his company's popular and influential blog, Signal vs. Noise or who have read any of his books, like Rework, the New York Times best - seller he co-wrote with his Basecamp partner, David Heinemeier Hansson.

Signal - to - noise ratio — too much clutter drowning out the good stuff.

All of these communications add up to clutter, to immense amounts of noise in which even the best staff will struggle to find a clear signal.

Borucki and his team keep developing better ways to filter out background noise and extract signals they missed before.

While we're pretty good at distinguishing a signal from the noise (as is the ferret brain), putting two songs together eliminates cues that the brain uses to tell things apart.

BRAN FERREN: I guess one reason why one cares is that, as a scientist looking at a deteriorating signal - to - noise ratio, I think it may become harder to find the good stuff when it's overwhelmed by the stuff that isn't.

But he says a truly practical sensor would need to discriminate between vibration signals while ignoring unwanted noise — a skill that spiders are very good at.

The spatial range corresponding to a good signal - to - noise ratio was tens of meters in the indoor noise environment of the NIST tests, but could be extended to hundreds of meters if the noise were reduced to the sensitivity levels of the sensor.

They are also more energy - efficient because they show lower heat loss, better signal - to - noise ratios and are less susceptible to interference.

«The only source of noise is the cosmic microwave background,» says Tarter, referring to remnant radiation from the big bang, whose signal has been well studied.

NICT developed the technology to perform the time synchronization and polarization reference frame matching between the satellite and the ground station directly from the QKD signals, as well as a quantum receiver capable of detecting such a weak signal with low noise.

Given that transit timing is an unproved method for discovering exoplanets, Agol would like to see a signal - to - noise ratio much higher than that found by the European group as well as confirmation by another observational technique.

A new paper by Yu et al contains a plot of the best targets, giving the expected «signal to noise» for each planet as a function of the planet's mass.

SPHERE opens new horizons in the study of young brown dwarfs and giant exoplanets thanks to high - contrast imaging capabilities at optical and near - infrared wavelengths, as well as high signal - to - noise spectroscopy in the near - infrared from low (R ~ 30 - 50) to medium resolutions (R ~ 350).

Instead, they weed out all the data that doesn't meet a certain signal - to - noise ratio automatically, leaving them with only the best candidates.

This allows us to build imaging systems that detect specific application relevant information in the huge amount of accessible optical data with the best possible signal to noise ratio.

Because of this automation, we were also able to vet simulated data sets and therefore measure how well the Robovetter separates those TCEs caused by noise from those caused by low signal - to - noise transits.

However, there are several outstanding challenges caused by the relaxation and decoherence processes of the NV center electron spin as these limit quantum gate fidelities on nuclear registers as well as spectral resolution, selectivity and signal to noise ratio in sensing applications.

By emitting a short interference signal through the sound system in the risk of a crash, the Mercedes - Benz system triggers a reflex within the inner ear to better prepare occupants for the noise.

Very little road noise disturbs riders, although a louder turn signal would better remind drivers to turn it off when no longer needed.

Two mikes allow for much better noise elimination; Apple has apparently worked to improve signal - to - noise in software.

With so many people trying to find something good to read, the indie books become more noise than signal.»

It's not that there isn't good free stuff, it's that the signal to noise ratio has gotten so insane that people are starting to avoid it altogether.

(This isn't to say there are not good authors like Hugh Howey that are self - published; just that the signal - to - noise ratio is lower, which makes it harder to find those authors).

I do better to avoid much of the intra-day noise and take end of day signals and sell long option positions in the morning.

It may have achieved good results in the past through overfitting the model, which would interpret some of the noise of the past as a signal to return to the earlier analogy.

Hand signals can be incorporated as well for those times when you need to keep the noise level down.

Thus the time scale for reliability of BVP runs needs a sufficient time scale such that you have a good sampling of possible paths (i.e. the signal has to be distinguished from the weather «noise»).

I won't belabor this except to say that good communication means more signal, less noise.

What is needed to show that models have skill are comparisons to data that is a) well characterised, and b) with a large signal to noise ratio.

Here's his response: «A convincing greenhouse gas - driven change has not emerged in the data so far, in my view, and may well be «in the noise» due to both large natural variability (compared to the expected size of the greenhouse gas - driven signal) and data quality issues.»

While statistical studies on extremes are plagued by signal - to - noise issues and only give unequivocal results in a few cases with good data (like for temperature extremes), we have another, more useful source of information: physics.

@ LUIS «What matters now, for AR5 and future work, is to improve the process so that the outgoing «signal» is increasingly at the service of the common good rather than responsive to the «noise» of either denialists or alarmists with vested interests.»

What matters now, for AR5 and future work, is to improve the process so that the outgoing «signal» is increasingly at the service of the common good rather than responsive to the «noise» of either denialists or alarmists with vested interests.

If their mean segment lenght is 12 years (as per P.Solar above, Nov. 4), then it is as if BEST took Lui's Fig. 2 and cut away EVERYTHING LEFT of 0.08 leaving little but white noise scraps to suture back together for a century + «signal».

If there is any Climate Sensitivity to CO2, to date we have been unable to eek out the signal to CO2 induced warming from the noise of natural variation notwithstanding the use of our best and most sophisticated measuring devices and the inherent shortcomings of our measurement systems and error bounds.

With longer time frames the signal to noise ratio improves and there is good agreement between the linear fits.

Signal to noise ratio of signal intensity measurement can be made high that way, which gives an optical depth map of the atmosphere with good frequency & spatio - temporal resolSignal to noise ratio of signal intensity measurement can be made high that way, which gives an optical depth map of the atmosphere with good frequency & spatio - temporal resolsignal intensity measurement can be made high that way, which gives an optical depth map of the atmosphere with good frequency & spatio - temporal resolution.

The noise that many want to cancel out or dismiss or claim that it all adds up to zero is a cacophony of interfering and amplifying signals from the elsewhere that are poorly understood at best.

When we consider that he picked two gridcells and took the best one, it would take the 7 % signal to noise estimate and drop it to indistinguishable from zero.

The KF should be able to track a well defined signal through nearly any kind of noise except noise that is highly correlated with the signal itself.

It looks like there's a difference in emphasis between people who do feature extraction where a feature signal is presumed to exist and suppression of noise is good, and those who do hypothesis testing, where you are asking whether a feature is provably present, and you need to compare the variance due to signal with that due to noise.

It does seem to me that a great deal of time is being wasted here arguing about that, and could be better spent on assessing the relationship between interval lengths and signal to noise ratios.

You've looked at many more of the emails than I have, which is the only way to form a view on the distribution as well as ratio of signal / noise.

You would have to leave that as ambiguous as well because that much uncertainty wouldn't allow you to discriminate the signal from the noise.

What test would we use to say well, Nino 3.4 is noise so we can safely subtract its effects from the global temperature signal, but, for example Nino 1 +2 is not noise, it's part of the signal?

Please enlighten me as to why I should be reasonably concerned with an anthropogenic signal, sea - level wise, which is at best 10 % of the most recent end extreme interglacial climate «noise», and which, at worst, is 2.8 % of the possible +21.3 m MSL which may have been achieved the last time we were at an eccentricity minimum.......

The best way to show that 60 - year averaging removes noise and leaves a signal is this.