Or, to put it in another way, Theo may be
better than Sterling now (I think he is when on top of his game) but he won't have much resale value in 3 years or so, particularly as he is injury prone and relies heavily on pace.
with his lack bpl experience saying he is
better than sterling is a bridge to far... he has potential to be far better by till he has the experience under his belt its meerely expectation and not reality.
The 2v1 chance where my nanny would have done
better than Sterling was Nacho's fault.
We have a list of players that can do
better than Sterling did in any positions that he played.
There is little doubt that sterling is a more accomplished winger than Walcott... But he will be massively over priced... That said Walcott on the open market wouldn't fetch more than 16 to18m (at most) so if lpool stick to their silly pricing are there players out there
better than sterling for 35m. . .
Only player of those you mentioned that's currently
better than Sterling is Reus (by some distance).
In my opinion there are players who Ozil keeps out of the German line up which are
better than Sterling or at least more promise....
Also, some fans need to understand that every academy graduate is not «the next» whoever... saw someone comment that «Gnabry is
better than Sterling» and hoards thumbed it up.
No... They just think he's far
better than Sterling, which, I agree with.
I agree the «Gnabry
better than Sterling» stuff is gung - ho club jingoism.
In fact they go to an extend of suggesting that Jordan Ibe and Ojo (never heard of him) are
better than Sterling.
Much
better than Sterling.
Too many think Gnabry is
better than Sterling so no point bothering.
Always believed he was way
better than Sterling too.
I believe cech is as good as ederson bellerin is as good as walker kos is better than otamendi mertesacker is better than stones kolasinac is better than delph fernandinho is better than coquelin de bruyne is better than Ramsey Silva is better than xhaxa Sanchez is better than sane wilshere is
better than sterling aguero is better than lacazette.
Not exact matches
Sterling rose on Wednesday, extending gains from earlier in the day as
better -
than - expected construction PMI data calmed investors after a selloff that took the currency five percent lower against the dollar in two weeks.
The Greenback is recovering the bulk of last week's losses, with the Euro weaker despite German IP and Exports
better than expected, and Euro Unemployment coming in at 7 year lows —
Sterling falls to October Lows on Article 50 headers — Turkey's Lira fresh record low on Moody's, Peso eyeballing lows into Auto Show Headers.
The chandelier could have been used in the Palace of Versailles, the
sterling silver probably came from Buckingham Palace, and the chairs are
better than you have in your living room.
1 he is nearer to the finished product 2 is a
better goal scorer 3 is even faster
than sterling 4 will definitely be cheaper 5 not arrogant and big headed like
sterling
Sterling might be worse at crossing and finishing, but else
than that he's a
better player if we exclude Walcotts pace.
im not to sure about
sterling because im on the idea to take a striker first, like lacazette and play in the wing ox, welbeck, walcott, chuba or maybe campbell or wellington (probably i would sell the last one... al of u try him like a star when he is not younger
than campbell and he did nt do anything, for me he is not on the standard)... BUT u cant said that walcott is the
best winger in the league when he is fit.
On
Sterling it's simple, he's
better than Theo (don't bother arguing me on that, just don't) and similar to Ox — albeit far more reliable / durable.
Sterling and The Ox were the same, only this time
Sterling has matured
better than The ox.
Cant believe michael owen had the audasity to say
sterling is a
better player
than ozil.
Also, he just made another post about him commenting «
Sterling is
better than Özil», saying «it's not even close».
I for one think Man Utd and Liverpool have made
better signings
than last summer and are stronger and Chelsea without signing anyone will be a force again since they won it last season and Man City will definitely add and are already stronger with
Sterling who I think is a definite upgrade to Navas.
SEE ALSO: Schweinsteiger Man Utd: Five signings who'd be
better than PAST - IT Bayern ace, including # 37m Liverpool target Liverpool transfers: Reds to sign Reus in # 93.5 m triple swoop, moves funded by
Sterling sale & two others Manchester United news
England and the temporary manager Gareth Southgate do have options up front, with players like Sturridge,
Sterling and Vardy but are any of them in
better form
than Walcott right now?
Michael Owen once said Raheem
Sterling is
better than Mesut Ozil.
Jordan Henderson, Raheem
Sterling and Simon Mignolet get the chance to show of their acting prowess and probably do a
better job of it
than most footballers.
Liverpool's need for reinforcements out wide could be even greater
than United's as
well, with reports today from the Daily Mirror suggesting that star player Raheem
Sterling is in advanced talks over an exit from the club after Manchester City made significant progress with a # 45m bid.
Already moving for # 44m a
good few years before transfer fees truly spiraled out of control, Raheem
Sterling must be worth more
than double that now after his explosive start to this season.
Sterling is a
good deal
better and Fekir has shown his quality... I'd say they're very much
better than Theo now.....
where as the like or
sterling, stones and walker are been sold nothing less
than 50mil, Lukaku even went to united nothing less
than 75 mil whereas Sanchez left foot is
better than Lukaku's both foot to me, they must be on some cheap high, if not for AFC that has been joking with players contract over the years we won't be in this situation... Sanchez is worth 100 mil -120 mil in today's transfer market
so a first choice defence of bellerin gab kos and darmien with kondogbia in DM position would give forward players real confidence... debouchey, chambers mert monreal as backup... and then a quality attacking option reus
sterling pedro lacazette whatever... all
better than walcott...... thats 3 in and half a dozen out... shouldnt be a big deal..
Sterling absolutely is
better than Theo, while I'd wager
good money Fekir would do more in this team
than Theo as
well.
Players from the continent have proven time and again to be
better than english players that's why the
best players in England are not english, average english players like Berahino,
Sterling, Kane etc are over priced their talent doesn't match their price tag!
Michael Owen From saying that Arsenal won't make the Top 4 to saying that
Sterling is
better than Ozil.
Following the departure of Raheem
Sterling to Manchester City for # 49million last week, the Reds, who finished sixth in the Premier League last season, have spent the majority of that money on Benteke and will he hoping he does a
better job on Merseyside
than that of club record signing Andy Carroll.
Thot you wanted to make another Michael Owen who thinks
Sterling is a
better player
than Ozil...... Aaaaahhhhh!!!! How talented was he, I mean Owen,,, maybe he's forgotten the meaning of the word... Speed and talent are two faaaaaaar removed words n must never b confused... Owen, you are a c **** nt....
Theo to me is a
better player
than sterling on any day.Remember the last match he played against totenham before he got injured..
And
Sterling will only move to play regularly and i don't think he is
better (at the moment)
than our current players but I would greatly welcome him as a «developing» talent.
Sterling is as
good as Walcott is now, he is
better than what Walcott was at
Sterling's age.
Rather
than pursuing
Sterling, Arsenal had
better focus on PSG's fringe players, like Draxler, Pastore, Moura and Di Maria.
That would make him a
better player
than Sterling, Douglas Luiz, Aleix Garcia, Moreno, Patrick Roberts, Sane and Gabriel Jesus (all 18 - 23).
Then he will after a top quality wide attacker to play on the right hand side —
Sterling, Draxler, Aubameyang,... GK — there are more
good GK available this summer
than Petr Cech - Hadanovic of Inter, Muslera from Galatasaray.
Griezman is that and cheaper
than sterling and is a goal scoring winger who is much
better in that position
than the whippet... So match his buy out clause or offer santi and cash and see what happens... Show some f @@@@@@ ambition for god sake.
Sterling would fit our system
better than Theo and his ceiling is far greater, that's my only comment.
Sterling initially rejected a first conctract offer from the club because he felt that he was worth more
than a dobuling of his weekly wage to a figure in the region of # 70,000, the report suggests, but former Queens Park Rangers teenager
Sterling also feels that the club's latest offer is also not
good enough.
Just imagin a scenerio where campbel ws french and sanogo ws not french, lets nt beat around the bush n pretend we r blind to what wenger does, liverpool gave
sterling a chanc man u the same to januzaj nw luk wher they r bt for wenger our youngsters has huge potential bt they rot on the bench take the example of Ox for hw many years hs he been in our team n we r seeing no improvmnt and the boy is
good nowdays wenger hinders the progress of our youngstars n to be frank campbell is right to want to leav us coz i dnt thnk he wil play mo games
than the beloved Sanogo nt because sanogo z
better than him bt simply bcoz he z french!