Sentences with phrase «better than a bad deal»

«No deal for Britain is better than a bad deal for Britain,» she told an audience in London.

Theresa May (and others) has said that from Britain's perspective, «no deal is better than a bad deal.»

She utters the banality that «no deal is better than a bad deal» but that is not the same as explaining how the UK lion would roar under such circumstances.

She has said repeatedly that «no deal is better than a bad deal».

The prime minister likes to say that «no deal is better than a bad deal».

[vi] This «we know best» attitude also permeated the government's White Paper, culminating in the statement that «The government is clear that no deal for the U.K. is better than a bad deal for the U.K.» The government may be clear on this, but it is not at all clear whether the people would share this view, indeed evidence is emerging that they do not.

There was her hard - line approach to Brexit: «no deal is better than a bad deal»; and, straight out of the Goodhart playbook, «if you believe you are a citizen of the world, you are a citizen of nowhere».

If there is no transitional agreement then we fall into the «no deal is better than a bad deal» camp even if politicians have been rowing back from that expression.

Everything turned on her line «no deal is better than a bad deal», coupled with the not - at - all - veiled threat that the UK will become a super low tax tiger economy if we don't get what we want.

This is not the «no deal is better than a bad deal» attitude we were hearing from her earlier in the year.

That's why the phrase «no deal is better than a bad deal» was so seductive.

Astonishingly, at one point she repeated, unprompted, the old suicidal mantra that «no deal is better than a bad deal».

Every time May says that «no deal is better than a bad deal», they are again being driven closer to having to make snap investment decisions in a state of regulatory uncertainty.

It is often said that no deal is better than a bad deal.

The most significant interpretation of the terms is to view them as articulating the Conservatives» «no deal is better than a bad deal» mantra.

The Committee describes the Government's assertion that «no deal is better than a bad deal» as «not helpful», and says it is «difficult, if not impossible, to envisage a worse outcome for the UK».

No deals is better than bad deals.

Some investors get impatient and end up making bad decisions, and as @Travis Dawson mentioned, no deal is better than a bad deal!

Not exact matches

So the Saudi investment may be more of a deal about the future of Uber's business, rather than whether it is a good or bad buy right now.

«There are some improvements that can be made in this agreement, but understand that status quo is a far better deal than getting bad changes to this agreement.»

[01:10] Introduction [02:45] James welcomes Tony to the podcast [03:35] Tony's leap year birthday [04:15] Unshakeable delivers the specific facts you need to know [04:45] What James learned from Unshakeable [05:25] Most people panic when the stock market drops [05:45] Getting rid of your fear of investing [06:15] Last January was the worst opening, but it was a correction [06:45] You are losing money when you sell on corrections [06:55] Bear markets come every 5 years on average [07:10] The greatest opportunity for a millennial [07:40] Waiting for corrections to invest [08:05] Warren Buffet's advice for investors [08:55] If you miss the top 10 trading days a year... [09:25] Three different investor scenarios over a 20 year period [10:40] The best trading days come after the worst [11:45] Investing in the current world [12:05] What Clinton and Bush think of the current situation [12:45] The office is far bigger than the occupant [13:35] Information helps reduce fear [14:25] James's story of the billionaire upset over another's wealth [14:45] What money really is [15:05] The story of Adolphe Merkle [16:05] The story of Chuck Feeney [16:55] The importance of the right mindset [17:15] What fuels Tony [19:15] Find something you care about more than yourself [20:25] Make your mission to surround yourself with the right people [21:25] Suffering made Tony hungry for more [23:25] By feeding his mind, Tony found strength [24:15] Great ideas don't interrupt you, you have to pursue them [25:05] Never - ending hunger is what matters [25:25] Richard Branson is the epitome of hunger and drive [25:40] Hunger is the common denominator [26:30] What you can do starting right now [26:55] Success leaves clues [28:10] What it means to take massive action [28:30] Taking action commits you to following through [29:40] If you do nothing you'll learn nothing [30:20] There must be an emotional purpose behind what you're doing [30:40] How does Tony ignite creativity in his own life [32:00] «How is not as important as «why» [32:40] What and why unleash the psyche [33:25] Breaking the habit of focusing on «how» [35:50] Deep Practice [35:10] Your desired outcome will determine your action [36:00] The difference between «what» and «why» [37:00] Learning how to chunk and group [37:40] Don't mistake movement for achievement [38:30] Tony doesn't negotiate with his mind [39:30] Change your thoughts and change your biochemistry [40:00] The bad habit of being stressed [40:40] Beautiful and suffering states [41:50] The most important decision is to live in a beautiful state no matter what [42:40] Consciously decide to take yourself out of suffering [43:40] Focus on appreciation, joy and love [44:30] Step out of suffering and find the solution [45:00] Dealing with mercury poisoning [45:40] Tony's process for stepping out of suffering [46:10] Stop identifying with thoughts — they aren't yours [47:40] Trade your expectations for appreciation [50:00] The key to life — gratitude [51:40] What is freedom for you?

In the three polls we looked at, considerably more Canadians saw the TPP as «good» or «positive» for Canada's economy than those who saw the deal as «bad» or «negative.»

Investors deal better with knowing about specific bad news rather than uncertainty, and that's what we're seeing play out now.

Tory platform says no Brexit deal better than bad one UK prime minister Theresa May unveiled the Conservative Party manifesto on Thursday, setting the stage for the general election on 8 June.

To make matters worse, the average congregation is more worried about overpaying the staff than underpaying them which leads to the church being crippled spiritually by pastoral changes as the pastor moves to a better deal or leaves the ministry or works multiple jobs just to support his family.

Adultery does come with consequences you're right because it nearly destroyed my marriage my husband, me as a Christian and as a person who has suffered anxiety and panic disorder all my life, but even that is being dealt with now and both me and my husband believe this is the glory of God turning a bad situation round for his glory as our marriage is better than it ever was and my health has improved, Jesus forgives.

Last, had I known that alcoholism is a disease worse than cancer, and that it ran through the family genes thus any baby born had a strong chance of becoming one... well, that seals the deal but, I bet the parents who also fell for religiosity, not knowing it was an enclave for pedophiles... talk about regrets from hell.

One of the standard criticisms of virtue ethics is that it is weak when dealing with issues in applied ethics, in contrast to deontology or utilitarianism, and this because virtue theorists focus on good or bad agents rather than right or wrong acts.

Sm.ut and prosti.tut.ion will always be with us so we'd best find ways of dealing with it other than harmful and (worse yet) useless tact.ics like guilt, shame, condem - nation and prohib.ition.

Jeremy have been asking the holy spirit for his help with this and in regards to the lame man that Jesus healed I do nt believe that sin was the issue for him just like the blind man was it his parents or did he sin the answer was neither but so that God would be glorified.What was the sin that may have been worse for him.The two situations are related of the woman caught in adultery the key words being go and sin no more only two references in the bible and will explain later the lame man we see at first his dependency on everyone else for his needs he cant do it he is in the best position to receive Gods grace but what does he do with it.Does he follow Jesus no we are told he goes to the temple and Jesus finds him now that he has his strength to do things on his own what his response to follow the way of the pharisees that is what is worse than his condition before so he is warned by go and sin no more.We get confused because we see the word sin but the giver of is speaking to him to go another way means death.Getting back to the two situations of the woman caught in adultery and the lame man here we see a picture of our hearts on the one our love for sin and on the other the desire to work out our salvation on our terms they are the two areas we have to submit to God.My experience was the self righteousness was the harder to deal with because it is linked in to our feelings of self worth and self confidence so we have to be broken so we are humble enough to realise that without God we can do nothing our flesh hates that so it is a struggle at first to change our way of thinking.brentnz

The Deutsche Bank analysis was prompted by the Far Work Commission's recent decision to reject a pay deal for workers at Coles, as it did not meet the «better off overall» test» because an employee who typically works weekends was worse off under the agreement than under the relevant retail modern award».

It's too bad Olshey didn't stick to what he does best — Aminu and Ed Davis level deals — as the Blazers would be far better off with Jonathon Simmons, Dewayne Dedmon etc on their level deals than Evan Turner.

@Goonster, you are absolutely correct my friend, what we see as the priorities are not Wengers priorities, we see this season after season with Ozil being probably the worst case, we all know a striker and a dm were more urgently needed.Some will say Wenger knows best but clearly he doesn't because our progress is so slow we appear to be standing still.Sanchez came in did well, but we still finished further away than last year.An Giroud still doesn't have any real competition upfront, im not a believer in Walcott as a main striker, if we do get a top striker like a Benzema it will most likely be a last minute deal after every1 has made their moves

there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark

Maybe the Giants should have gone after Frazier rather than trade for Longoria, where even if he has a good year, the contract left makes it a bad deal.

In a four team deal you could envision a scenario where Portland is sending out a pick as well, which are much more valuable than Houston's because the team will presumably be worse.

Super mario to liverpool, we rejectd him cus of bad world cup, bt to be fair he is miles better than giroud wen he finalis his deal nd start bagin goals @pool we wil al moan,

And if he decides against opting out of his deal because the market for corner bats has potentially dried up, well, the Angels could do a lot worse than $ 88.5 million spread out over four years for a guy who can actually hit and just turned 30 days ago.

And ideally would get less than $ 15M per — but I am predicting a future that is authored by the idiots in the front office — so I expect his deal with look something like $ 19M — $ 18M — $ 17M — my hope is that they don't throw in the fourth season at $ 20M and / or they don't match some nonsense max contract from Brooklyn (or whoever)... as I note, I see Lavine is a net negative player who could put up impressive numbers on a bad team — good for the tank.

While you might think you're jinxing yourself by thinking about something going wrong, it's far better to plan for the worst and hope for the best than to end up being in an emergency situation and not having any idea how you're going to deal with it.

Falconer goes on to praise the emergency brake as «indicative of a prime minister who is aware that there are significant numbers of communities in this country who feel that immigration from the European Union is making their position worse rather than better», and describes changes to child benefit and exclusion from ever closer union rated as «sensible... I don't attack the deal he's done».

Its too bad we couldn't have gotten someone better than Lazio to run then we never would have to deal with this awful joke of a Republican ticket.

Today's report says ministers had been «at best naive and at worst misleading» in dealing with the issue and concluded that by focusing energy on denying the ombudsman's findings, rather than considering what might be done to help those who lost their savings, the government had «caused further distress to complainants».

Opposition parties have accused the Tories of pursuing a «hard Brexit» strategy, with the PM insisting no deal is better than a bad one and planning to withdraw the UK from the EU single market.

In tone it reminds a great deal of Joe Dante's Gremlins II — more jokey than scary, in other words, and, like Gremlins II, Eight Legged Freaks works better than it ought to because of some fairly nifty special effects (I've seen worse CGI) and better - than - average performances from its B - list cast.

But the big bad bosses of the film are also a disappointment, including the evil - but - conflicted black - magic witch in a good human's body, Enchantress, and the superfluous inclusion of her hulking demonic brother at her side, Incubus, whose abilities are thinly defined and whose motivations other than perhaps family loyalty are not at all dealt with.

It was the first time in a long while that I saw more than 200 movies and a lot of them were incredibly good (a lot were incredibly bad, or boring, but I've already dealt with those).

Any movie like this made for the most part since the 1980s would talk the talk about showing the changes, but not show it, show it badly and / or be more sexually oppressed than not, but Russell has zero trouble from this first film he had control over himself dealing with all kinds of human sexuality, yet that freedom is incidental to character study, capturing the story and bringing it to life as he does so well here.

Of the other competition buzz films leaving Sundance with distribution deals that guarantee their release: Peter Hedges's Pieces of April is a silly sitcom with a Guess Who's Coming to Dinner twist; Tom McCarthy's The Station Agent is little more than a three - character, metaphorically burdened off - Broadway play, but Peter Dinklage's understated performance gives it a bit of substance; Catherine Hardwicke's thirteen captures the hysteria of teenage girls, and its depiction of how a good girl can go bad overnight will give parents nightmares, but the script, co-written by Hardwicke and Nikki Reed (who also plays one of the two teen leads), is as overexcited as the girls themselves, and its affirmative ending is unearned.

Ms. Ravitch says very badly, maybe even worse than before, and her view, elaborated in a new book — «The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice are Undermining Education» — has been getting a good deal of attention, including from Congress, which she was off to visit this week.