Having taxpayers fund the campaigns» expenses was considered
better than candidates indebting themselves to big - money contributors — including state contractors — who have special interests in government decisions.
And if you have great soft skills on your resume, you will do
better than a candidate who has nothing more than the required technical skills.
Nothing works
better than a candidate who understands the business and knows how he or she might fit in or help.
Not exact matches
Individual
candidates just need to figure out how to leverage it
better than everyone else.
Even if there are only 10 people applying for a spot you want to fill, wouldn't you rather that all ten
candidates are adequate and you are choosing the
best one, instead of choosing simply 1 out of 40 just because he is a little
better than the others, even though not exactly what you're looking for?
Once the startup finds
candidates it trusts to learn the growing process, it has to train them and teach them the company's more
than 100
best operating procedures.
Simply looking for the traits you think a leader should have isn't enough, according to Furnham, you also need to worry if a
candidate has a trait in excess and provide structures that make sure would - be leaders learn how to express those traits for
good rather
than ill.
«This speech rings true, makes sense, and is freshly phrased and
well - articulated,» he says, adding a joke: «At this rate, he'd make a heck of a lot
better Republican presidential
candidate than Ted Cruz!»
Asking her a question that directly applies pressure, such as «what makes you think you are
better for this job
than all the other
candidates?»
George Anders's latest book looks at talent hunting and how some recruiters have spotted
better job
candidates than the competition.
Employers also find that pay transparency can remove an important bargaining tool when they want to offer
good candidates higher wages
than others employees in the same jobs.
Since Iowa typically picks more conservative
candidates than other states, Rubio's 23 percent showing was
better than expected.
According to Bentley University's Women in Business survey, 57 percent of corporate recruiters say women are
better job
candidates than men.
In her experience, grittier
candidates accept feedback
better, work harder, and bounce back faster from setbacks
than entrepreneurs who went from prep school to the Ivy League to an MBA and beyond.
The
best CEO
candidates will only want to join if they believe that the board is truly independent, without any agenda other
than the long - term success of the business.
«As an entry - level
candidate, it's
better to omit an objective statement altogether
than include one peppered with fluffy buzzwords that focuses on what you want from the job,» Augustine says.
When asked whether he would vote for Trump again during the 2020 elections, Niemeyer pauses — and then clarifies that while he voted for Trump, he was not 100 % behind the
candidate — but thought him
better than the alternatives.
But, there is nothing magically inherent to a venture backed startup company that makes it a
better IPO
candidate than a local hardware store.
Parent PLUS borrowers are often especially attractive
candidates for refinancing, as
well, as you probably have a stronger credit profile and income
than new graduates.
We've done some interesting things to figure out how many job
candidates we should be interviewing for each position, who are
better interviewers
than others and what kind of attributes tend to predict success at Google.
Rather
than relying on personal assets such as a car, boat or home to secure the loan, unsecured lenders look exclusively at a borrower's credit worthiness to determine eligibility, making those with high credit scores and a long, solid credit history the
best candidates for an unsecured business line of credit.
Any computational problem that requires orders of magnitude more resources to solve algorithmically
than it takes to verify the solution is a
good candidate for proof of work.
Despite all the uproar surrounding our presidential
candidates, changing your investment strategy based on your political beliefs is likely to do more harm
than good.
What
better way to promote the abolishment of the Senate
than to run a
candidate in the very election that could choose Alberta's next Senators?
Many of the
best job
candidates look for employers who do more
than give lip service to the idea of flexible work and work - life balance for their team members.
When the results are announced, they indicate that Medico's drug
candidate works
better than expected as a treatment for skin cancer.
He was also
better at articulating those beliefs
than most Republican
candidates, and he won his Senate seat in the key swing state of Florida.
I have no reason to believe their judgment selecting
candidates for office or voting on referenda is any
better than their judgment evaluating doomsday theories.
I know Romney performed
better than McCain among evangelicals, but I still think it's much easier for the Republican Party to win a presidential election with a
candidate with fervent evangelical support (this requires the rather delicate trick of not scaring the daylights out of everyone else in the country).
Based on one's core convictions and values, there is no doubt that some
candidates are a
better choice
than others.
In fact I would say Huntsman probably has a
better foreign perspective
than any other
candidate, being the ambassador to China and speaking fluent Mandarin.
I personally think that Obama's election was more about his left wing ideology
than his «skin color» because if it had only been about «skin color» then the POTUS
candidates on the right who were black, would have had just as
good a chance to become the POTUS, as Obama did.
How about writing an article where you wonder which one of the Repub
candidates will offer up a far
better economic plan
than our current President and senate?
Exactly, the only «nuance» involved was which
candidate fit a particular individual's right - wing ideology
better than another.
I should acknowledge that one or another of the forms of Wesleyanism I have just listed might
well be a
better candidate for full - length treatment
than process theology.
Two out of five voters don't think Trump or Clinton would be a
good president; half say they're voting against a
candidate rather
than in support of one.
No
better than the Evangelical «force our Christianity down your throat» coming from the other Republican
Candidates.
Well, besides the fact that there were more
than two
candidates to choose from, maybe you should reexamine your interpretations.
No
candidate will do these things perfectly, but some
candidates will definitely do such things
better than others.
If the
candidates where to respond to these questions with scriptural references, they could point out a few flaws in the questioning while stating their beliefs and thereby come away looking
better than before.
I know a young woman seminarian whose approval for ordination was postponed for a year with the explanation by the examining committee that they knew she could stand the postponement
better than other, less mature
candidates.
To judge by this study, and also by much anecdotal evidence, that is sometimes
better understood by the adult catechumens and
candidates than by the leaders of RCIA.
Thus when one of his disciples, the future Cardinal, Baronius, proved incapable of preaching on any subject other
than the pains of hell, Philip refused to allow him to preach on spiritual subjects at all, and made him teach Church History instead (Baronius went on to become one of the greatest Catholic historians ever, as
well as a
candidate for Beatification).
By 1992, Evangelicals were George Bush's
best supporters, giving him 56 percent of their votes in the three - way race (and 67 percent of the two - party vote); and to a greater extent
than ever before they backed Republican
candidates all the way down the ticket.
Altogether, GOP House
candidates captured one - half of the vote, some nine percentage points
better than Dole.
Both the dreamy and the deplorable are categorically the same: imperfect
candidates that you deem
better than the rest.
In general, Democratic voters seem less concerned with a
candidate's faith life, though more who believed Clinton was religious were likely to think she would also be a
good president (69 %)
than those who didn't believe she was religious but would make a
good leader (54 %).
We are not electing «head preacher of the US» — we're attempting to elect the
candidate most likely to increase the greatness of our nation and be a
better commander in chief
than the other guy.
He did
better in Virginia
than Republican senatorial
candidate George Allen and
better in Wisconsin
than Tommy Thompson.
That's a
good reason, for a two year old... You may want to spend a couple minutes and find out why people don't like a
candidate, see if there is any validity and then decide on who is
best to lead the country which to me is more important
than out of spite.