Sentences with phrase «better than any offensive»

Bryant is better than any offensive player on the Jags» roster, and U.K. fans — even those in Jacksonville gear — seem to want the U.S. to know they know that.

Not exact matches

The most offensive aspect of Obama's assessment was its crude anthropological reductionism, the assumption that he understood the people of the small towns better than they understood themselves.

I find atheists offensive if they have nothing better to do than annoy the rest of society with their hatred.

let not some men among you laugh at others: it may be that the (latter) are better than the (former): nor let some women laugh at others: it may be that the (latter) are better than the (former): nor de-fame nor be sa - rca - stic to each other, nor call each other by (offensive) nicknames: Ill - seeming is a name connoting wi - cke - dness, (to be used of one) after he has believed: And those who do not de-si-st are (Indeed) doing wrong.

To be specific, a military large enough to execute the current U.S. strategy and also to conduct numerous long - term humanitarian interventions would have to be considerably larger and better funded than the one we have now (our present army, for example, is only two - thirds the size it was during the Desert Storm offensive).

He had a hand in more than 41 percent of the goals the Oilers scored when he played, which is right on par with the best offensive players in hockey.

now wengers absurd transfer policy «is down to you people»... seriously krish n`chips... the acolytes of the delusional one are beginning to sound even more of a parody than the master himself... walcott is a very very average player with one good season in 12 years at the club... the fact that wenger hasnt sold him is part of the sorry state of our club and the idea that this can be blamed on fans who want to see us back challenging for top trophies is frankly offensive

He has way better offensive potential and as a back up C is not that much worse than Wolters.

Mayfield, the offensive line, the experienced secondary and linebacking corps, and the fact that OU has recruited better than anybody else in the conference tells you why OU should still be strong.

No offensive leader there... Walcott and Ox are both on d same level Campbell and Giroud better than both of them....

For the first couple of months of the Season, it was repeatedly said, they are better than their record, they need time to incorporate the new offensive weapons, they hustle too much to not start getting bounces, the ball will eventually stay down..

His very good / great offensive stats just elevate him to a higher level than a 1 - dimensional steals machine.

As much as Lynn wants to emphasize the run, this year's offensive line pass blocks better than last year's offensive line, but run blocks worse.

Is this year's offensive line any better than last year's horrible offensive line?

Clemson's offensive line made his big night against Perine and the Sooners possible by clearing the space that ensured Gallman was further downfield before contact, on average, than his OU peer (though a leg injury to Perine helped as well).

OLine - The offensive line has been a lot better this year than previous seasons.

He has a single offensive move and it is a good one but can't move anywhere than up and down one flank and relies others to spring him.

Given the makeup of Chicago's roster and its implementation of the triangle, this was probably Pippen's maximum offensive output, as he peaked in offensive load at 43 (96th percentile) while the Bulls posted a respectable +2.2 rORtg when healthy, better than any offense Michael Jordan led before Phil Jackson arrived.5

They were 17 percent better compared to average than the Dodgers, themselves an elite offensive club.

That's an incredibly valuable player assuming Heredia gives us better offensive production than our utility options (which I think he will).

After watching the Colts offensive line shut out the Broncos» fantastic pass rushers, the Patriots had better think long and hard about using Collins more as a rusher than a cover guy this weekend.

If you can't do better than that to showcase your most explosive receiver, your offensive coordinator fucking sucks!

Brogdon could be better on that end, but I think ultimately the Bucks» challenge at the PG spot is an offensive one, especially in crunch time when you're playing lots of two - man game and the defense will very rationally try to make Delly (or Brogdon) rather than Giannis beat them.

That's why I put extra value on a guy who can, in fact, turn the corner consistently, because I know if they can develop a good inside move to go along with it, the offensive tackles they face are going to be sitting ducks more often than not.

For however bad McConnell is on offense and Okafor is overall, they both were better offensive players as starters than as bench players.

It's better to be lucky than good at times, but if you take away the sack he got when he was unblocked and the one he got off a quarterback scramble, that means only three of those seven sacks came when he beat an offensive lineman with a pass rush move.

Well hell, if they aren't going to get more than one offensive lineman, then at least they got another running back which will help after the other two are banged up from taking too many hits.

Paterno is still wildly robust, faster than some of his offensive linemen, with better hair than most TV weathermen.

He's much better offensive than Callum, but weaker defensive.

- It's to be argued whether or not our current WR corps is better than the one we had last season — but surely it's not gonna be significantly better with the same offensive strategy and play calling.

Nope, at best, it makes you slightly less offensive assholes than the asshole Eagle fans you are obsessing about.

The Wolverines desperately need offensive lineman in the 2017 class, and there aren't many better than American Heritage's Tedarrell Slaton.

Kellen was a legendary college QB, but thats college and his offensive scheme allowed him to have better numbers than his NFL play would suggest.

This is the case for Kawhi as the best player in basketball: He is no worse than the second - best defender in the world and among the very best offensive players in the world.

You could throw in to this theory that we are an offensive team which seeks to entertain and accordingly plays with the philosophy that the best form of defence is attack and we will score more than the opposition.

Although faster than Hart, Smith hides well behind his offensive lineman and finds the open holes.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

The Rockets have provided the model for offensive play in this era and there's an argument to be made that no one has ever done it better than Houston.

Golden is training - tape good with his moves, while he may at times struggle with supersized offensive tackles, a tight end that isn't much bigger than him is usually going to be toast.

But at Alabama, with a wonderfully accurate passer (two of them, actually), the best receiver in college football (Amari Cooper), a deeper - than - acknowledged receiving corps, a great offensive line, and a ridiculous set of running backs, it all works.

We lost our best offensive lineman to retirement and the options to replace him right now are a career back - up no better than the back - up swing lineman he replaced, a second - year Day 3 draftee and a career offensive tackle.

Since the Wizards are such a great defensive rebounding team, that's enough for them to not only survive but thrive on the boards in those small lineups, getting better numbers than their averages on both offensive and defensive rebound percentage.

Coquelin is a solid def DM but his offensive capabilities are severely limited, I do like how you covered that with having two players who are good passers, already done better than Wenger

Milwaukee was actually a better offensive team last season (No. 13) than defensive (No. 19) one, but its need for a go - to scorer showed in the postseason.

I get the need for offensive creation (although Collins, Prince and Schroder are all significantly better on offense than defense, which is worth noting) but it's a tiebreaker, not a deciding factor IMO.

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

Without looking, I'd bet buddy is more efficient than Westbrook but no one is going to argue buddy is a better offensive player.

The season before last 14 15 we did better with the points than last season even though we came second from last season we know we conceded many goals from set pieces and were very short on goal scoring the logic of this season was to fix the defensive department and the offensive department by introducing a defender to reduce the amount of goals conceded unless holding is to be the man we havent us of yet fixed the problem on the offensive department we all know the only offensive player is chuba apkom well else we have not addressed the problem so in reality I do not except Arsenal to finish the season with more than 70 points and personally think minimum point required to win the premier league is 85 points have we got that in our squad it will remain to be seen if chuba and holding are enough for a key to unlock the season we will soon find out but I think MR wenger is gambling with the introduction of new manageress which lives us with Liverpool and Leicester and who will take the points off united chelsea and city the next 6 games should give us the indication to what may happen to the long run for the new year

From an offensive standpoint, he is better than Casali no matter which way you slice it.

I think we should just go back to 4 -2-3-1 if the Ox can't make this game because he is our best offensive player in the 3 -4-3... he gives us hope down that flank... No offensive player have faired better than him in the new formation, maybe Perez can try.....