So you can't say that a charity that got an «A» in the Fundraising Organizations category is necessarily
better than a charity which got a «B» in the Social Services category.
Not exact matches
In fact, there's probably no
better way to end this post
than with a video of Mr. Buffett playing ukulele duet for
charity with Jon Bon Jovi.
While it is important to function as a non-profit in legal terms, the most successful
charities are
well - run organizations, no different
than for - profit companies but with a different business objective.
What
good are you — other
than the fact that you put in an honest day's work, take care of your kids, and given a few bucks to
charity now and then?
There is a
better, more tax - efficient way for donors to help their favorite
charities than writing a check or pulling out their credit card.
From the consumer's perspective, what's
better than improving one's financial health, being able to donate more to
charity as a result, and have your proceeds from the book go to
charity immediately!
The charge has also resulted in savings of # 60 million in litter clean - up costs and donations of more
than # 29 million from retailers towards
good causes including
charities and community groups.
Imports / Exports are stand still, the banks have stopped taking any fixed assests and lands as bank guarantee towards taking loans to over come this situations where you can not find buyers paying
good towards what you sell when you need financial liquidity... but these time you can not sell unless you will sell it at the lowest ever in the market...!?! Honestly tired of that now more
than was tired before all that started but at least things were stable although many were deprived but managed to live by those upper hands / classes giving
charity..
Too many
charities give away things but fail to appreciate they are doing more harm
than good.
In themselves they are
good, but they were never meant to be simply «in themselves» — to be isolated from the God - relation, to be anything other
than modes of
charity.
Of course, as our convictions persist and mature, we begin to see the ways in which we are complicit in global wealth disparity and injustice, and we begin to think more seriously about policy, about sustainability, about making more dramatic attitude and lifestyle changes, and about problems within some of our
charities and justice groups that perpetuate a white savior complex, sometimes doing more harm
than good.
So, both groups thought that spending almost $ 40k to insult each other was a
better idea
than say, donating it to
charity?
At this present time, in a period of decline in Christian faith and morals which is still unchecked, still sweeping even lower, it remains true that the teachings given men by Christ, although whittled away and progressively abandoned, still preserve a
better level of
charity, justice, and chastity in human affairs throughout Christendom
than prevails in those regions where the name of Christ has hardly entered, or where it is bitterly persecuted.
And the
good charities run things MUCH more efficiently
than the government, so the resources get to the people who need the help instead of getting siphoned off bit by bit as it flows through various bureaucracies.
Mark 10 - 25 A camel has a
better chance of going through a head of a needle
than a rich man does of entering the kingdom of GOD... Interpret that for
charity
When consistently loving, humble people who clearly live for more
than our culture offers are repeatedly, publicly bullied and harassed, when
charities and schools are fined and marginalized, and when the
good and the forgiving turn the other cheek and get slapped hard across that one too, this conversation will start to look different.
Coming from the Pope it sounds like
charity and
good will but measured on a political scale it is closer to Marxism
than capitalism.
Can we please agree that any «when I give
charity I'm
better than you because I do it for
better reasons» conversation is utterly pointless?
Perhaps that sounds harsh in a Christian context when evidence suggests that we are
better at giving to
charity than the average Brit.
Churches still provide social services for free, a gathering place for people, and much more at a much lower cost
than any government - sponsored «sliding scale» services, as
well as raising
charity.
Not feeding hungry or pay
charity as should or storing money abroad in banks or holes under ground rather
than investing it to generate business and
good living for the nation nor even the slightest right of freedom!
But,, when we do it with
charity, it models Christ and is
better than being a «clanging gong.»
Obama contributed LESS
THAN ONE PERCENT to
charity during his
best years of income.
When more emphasis was given by preachers to the gaining of indulgences — for instance, by the
good work of making a cash contribution to the building of a church —
than to the sacraments, the liturgy and ordinary acts of
charity, then it was made to appear as though the values of the Gospel were being abandoned.
Gluttony — Morbid obesity is a pretty
good indicator Greed — «Greed has fed more mouths
than charity ever could» — Limbaugh, Nov. 2011 Sloth — Again, morbid obesity and a propensity for synthetic opiates don't indicate an active lifestyle.
I don't begrudge them making a
good living and living comfortably but do think if it was truly all about God they would use a large part of the millions they are apparently making to help others / give to
charity rather
than on Rolexes and mansions and multiple exotic cars, etc... I don't think if Jesus was walking the earth today preaching that's how hed be living.
They were the 7th
best squad from the
charity stripe during the regular season but they made less
than 80 % of their attempts.
Sometimes giving to
charity is a
better gift
than receiving a physical gift.
It is said that it is
better for a man to discipline his child
than to give
charity.
I can think of no
better job
than finding worthy
charities to support and help.
So no one is more supportive
than I am of No Kid Hungry, the
well regarded childhood hunger arm of the anti-hunger
charity, Share our Strength.
Comic Relief,
better known as Red Nose Day, has raised more
than # 1bn for
charities in 30 years but one MP said it has «tattooed images of poverty in Africa» onto people's minds.
Dogs Trust believes that compulsory microchipping is the
best way of permanently identifying a dog and is a more cost efficient and effective system
than dog licensing, which the
charity regards as a tax on dog owners.
We know what rough sleepers need
better than any council or
charity does.»
However, this is a lot smaller
than most
well - known
charities.
The task force is made up representatives of more
than a dozen nonprofits, including the Bowery Residents Committee, Supportive Housing network of New York, Catholic
Charities and HELP USA,
well - regarded operators and providers among the city's shelter, supportive housing and homeless services professionals.
Many give back to communities they came from or to
charities that help kids that find themselves in situations very much like they themselves have grown up in, that may have been less
than best....
Overhead aversion has long been known to be powerful, he says, even causing «people to prefer to give to
charities with lower overhead that help fewer people
than charities with higher overhead that actually do more
good.»
Here at GovernorHQ we have another hypothesis about why we school governors often spend more time governing
than in many
charities: we deal with so many staffing issues, ones that in more functional organisations are simply dealt with
better by management at an earlier stage and do not end up reaching the board of trustees.
All in all, the auction raised more
than $ 8.5 million for a number of different
charities, an endeavor that's always marked with
good tidings from everyone in the auto industry.
Gavin set a new personal
best time and helped to raise more
than $ 136,000 for the CLIC Sargent children's cancer
charity.
«We couldn't think of a worthier or
better charity to donate our books to
than Toys For Tots,» said Archie Comics CEO Jon Goldwater.
I'm thinking of a study done on giving to
charity: the researchers found that people who were at the poverty line who gave a little donation of something to someone made them feel «at least I'm
better off
than they are and I can afford to give him a quarter.»
Much like the 2011 Spreecast event that
Good e-Reader hosted with author HP Mallory for more
than one hundred of her fans, this platform basically charges a pittance fee for
charity and allows a unique engagement experience between authors and their readers.
With
charity moustache - growing event Movember starting in less
than two weeks, it's a
good time to look at accessories and tools to keep the face fuzz in check.
Keep in mind: there are
good reasons why some
charities have larger reserves
than others.
It also seems that our
best bet for growing the corpus into «perpetuity» is to use the 100 % equity mix, recognizing that there will be the occasional bear market year when the
charities will get a smaller donation
than in the prior year.
It truly is
better to give
than to receive, so give more to your local church,
charity, or individual that you want to help change.
«If a
charity spends 90 cents to raise a dollar and 10 cents goes to the cause, that's
better than if that 10 cents went to popcorn and a movie.»
The key is finding a credit card that earns at a higher rate
than the
charity would pay in credit card processing fees (if you're unable to do this, you'd be
best off just sending the
charity a direct deposit donation that is slightly smaller instead).