Organic agriculture performs
better than conventional agriculture on a per hectare scale, both with respect to direct energy consumption (fuel and oil) and indirect consumption (synthetic fertilizers and pesticides).
Under European conditions, organic agriculture performs
better than conventional agriculture with regard to certain parameters: for example, 30 to 100 percent higher microbial activity3 and a significantly higher biomass (+30 to 40 percent), density (+ 50 to 80 percent) and species diversity of earthworms, a key soil - macro faunal species4.
In most cases, organic agriculture conserves
better than conventional agriculture the site - typical plant community of floral species of arable land.
With respect to energy consumption, organic agriculture is performing
better than conventional agriculture.
Not exact matches
Memphis Meats founder Uma Valeti, a former cardiologist, is using cellular
agriculture to produce chicken, duck, and beef that he believes will be healthier to eat and
better for the environment
than conventional meat, all without the slaughter of animals.
However the smaller parcel of land needed to grow X amount of food using
conventional agriculture, as
well as the surrounding landscape, will be much more heavily impacted
than the larger parcel of land needed if we opt for organic
agriculture instead.