Sentences with phrase «better than our dividend»

Brian's four reasons why rental properties are better than dividends are outlined below along with my comments.

This is mainly why our conservative portfolios performed better than our dividend growth holdings.

In some ways, stock buybacks are better than dividends.

But in some ways, stock buybacks are better than dividends.

However, please note, systematic withdrawal plans (SWP) is better than dividend plans because of the following reasons:

When it comes to safe and consistent dividend growth, few companies have done it better than the dividend aristocrats, S&P 500 companies with 25 + consecutive years of payout increases under their belt.

Not exact matches

They usually pay good dividends, usually trade for less than their cash or assets in the bank, and are fairly stable (it's very hard for a municipality to not pay back its debts for various reasons, some of them constitutional).

Buffett is right that, for most of his stock - picking history, shareholders have likely been better off leaving their money in his care rather than siphoning the cash into their own accounts by way of dividends: Since 1965, Berkshire Hathaway stock has delivered annualized returns of nearly 21 %, more than double the S&P 500.

It is good for the investing public to know that the company is making decisions about things like dividends with the best interests of shareholders in mind, rather than the best interests of the CEO.

First, he believes that an investor in a low - cost S&P index fund who reinvests all dividends will do better — very likely substantially better — than an investor who buys a 17 - year government bond and reinvests all of his coupons in the same instrument.

April 23 (Reuters)- Barrick Gold Corp reported a slightly better than expected increase in first - quarter adjusted profit on Monday and said it was done selling assets to cut debt and would instead use funds from any future sales to boost growth or pay dividends.

That was much better than 2013's 2 % slide for bonds, again including dividends.

All the best, I realized that I left the growth factor a bit lacking in that message, but I also think you will find that in most investment senerios the compounding of the dividend / income is what drives portfolio performance rather than capital gains.

My reasoning: Return would be lower than Dividend Investing above because index funds need to hold stocks yielding 1 and 2 % as well as those yielding > 3 %.

Such returns are much better than the average private equity, CD, bond market, P2P lending, and dividend investing returns.

Dividends from a quality, well - diversified portfolio are much more predictable than capital gains and best of all, they are passive.

Companies with records of steadily increasing dividends usually fared better in the ratings than those in which dividend growth has been erratic or where dividend cuts or omissions have occurred.

What's better than receiving dividends every quarter?

I absolutely do not believe that mutual funds are a better investment than individual stocks (companies that pay rising dividends over time) over the long run, so I invest the rest of my savings in a taxable account (as well as maxing out my Roth IRA every year, of which individual stocks are purchased).

If you've ever had occasion to look into the academic research comparing different types of returns from stocks that have different characteristics, as a class, dividend stocks tend to do better than the average stock over long periods of time.

Unilever posted better - than - expected first quarter revenues and increased its quarterly dividend by 12 % as it continues to appease shareholders after a failed takeover attempt by Kraft Heinz.

In my experience, a dividend growth portfolio strategy seems to be performing better as an investment than owning a home, in my honest opinion, I would rather rent in a great area than own a home in that area, jeez if I were able to get a lease agreement for 10 years indexed at inflation or at 2.5 % increase annually I would take it and take my down payment and invest it in my portfolio, and continue to contribute the max in my 401K, HSA, and Roth IRA, while enjoying living in a low tax bracket because of my contributions.

MarketCap / GVA is better correlated with actual subsequent S&P 500 total returns than price / forward earnings, the Fed Model, the Shiller P / E, price / book, price / dividend, Tobin's Q, market capitalization to GDP, price / revenue and every other valuation ratio we've developed or examined in market cycles across history.

There are alternatives that can protect investors from future inflation that are less volatile (TIPS) or offer a better return profile (REITs and even high quality dividend stocks) than commodities.

Discipline refers to the rigorous quantitative and qualitative methodologies used in the identification and selection of companies that have: better than average relative valuations; a track record of dividend growth and a sustainable payout level; and balance sheet strength.

When the stock market dividend yield yields more than a 10 - year US treasury bond yield, it's generally a good sign to invest in equities.

They pay better dividends than the Index and every other sector barring telecoms.

The investors who have succeeded best are those who have planed their portfolios to live off capital gains rather than dividends and interest.

The purchase price of each Share will be (i) not less than the net asset value per Share (the «NAV Per Share») of the Company's common stock (as determined in good faith by the board of directors of the Company or a committee thereof, in its sole discretion) immediately prior to the Expiration Date (as defined in the Offer to Purchase)(the date of repurchase) and (ii) not more than 2.5 % greater than the NAV Per Share as of such date, plus any unpaid dividends accrued through the expiration date of the Tender Offer.

So, while more boring than they once were, U.S. financials may be well positioned to potentially provide a dividend stream.

Like last month I haven't really focused too much into putting cash into the market other than the dividends which I receive, which of course is still a good help during times when freed up capital is tight.

When things turn south, everything turns south so there had better be more than a 3 % dividend yield and some underperforming appreciation to compensate.

When I survey the more than 20 years since that first issue, a lot has changed in DRIP (Dividend ReInvestment Plans) investing, much for the better.

As its name suggests, the blog is focused largely on dividend paying stocks rather than value or growth stocks, which makes it better suited for conservative income investors.

With better - than - reported fundamentals, a long history of dividend growth, and undervalued stock price, this firm earns a spot on this month's Dividend Growth Stocks Model Portfolio and is this week's Lodividend growth, and undervalued stock price, this firm earns a spot on this month's Dividend Growth Stocks Model Portfolio and is this week's LoDividend Growth Stocks Model Portfolio and is this week's Long Idea.

Good explanation of some differences between growth and dividend stocks, much better than a lot of other stuff I've read that just looks at charts and not the reasons behind them.

If a company pays a dividend equivalent to a 3 % yield, management is essentially telling investors they can't find better investments within the company that will return greater than 3 %.

Also and even better than that I put together some forums here on More Dividends.

For those investors who desire a monthly income with the flexibility of investment choice, and the potential for better returns than achievable from a savings account, then investing into stocks that pay their dividends monthly could be the answer.

Clearly, combining dividend reinvestment, with high yielding stocks that offer a good rate of dividend growth pays more than dividends!

At less than 14x our estimate of normalized EPS and with over a 3 % dividend yield, we believe the current valuation is attractive for this good collection of businesses.

This ETF yields 3.4 % on dividend, so saving small money into this ETF may provide a lot better return than saving money in a savings account where we can receive 0.90 % APY only.

If we were to substitute EBIT / TEV for the P / B, P / E, price - to - dividends, P / S, P / whatever, we'd have seen slightly better performance than the Magic Formula provided, but you might have been out of the game somewhere between 1997 to 2001.

I think there are better opportunities among the dividend kings list than FCMB.

You need patience and conviction to be a dividend growth investor and... a Warren Buffett - like belief that it is better to be approximately right than precisely wrong!

To the question; are dividend kings better than the stock market?

With a track record of paying a dividend every year since 1890, including more than 60 consecutive years of payout increases, the company's reputation as a dependable income investment is well - earned.

As you can see many of the stocks mentioned may have high current PE's but also feature long to very long dividend histories with relatively high ten year annualized dividend growth rates at around or better than 10 %.

We all know that time in the market is much better than timing the market when it comes to compounding dividend returns.

More than a year's worth of dividends disappeared, if you see it that way (which is not a good way to see it, as it can lead to depression).