Sentences with phrase «better than poor people»

Not exact matches

By the end of the semester, he'd raised another $ 5 million and was standing in front of the Digital Life Design conference in Munich, promising a world in which education was nearly free, available to poor people in the developing world, and better than anything that had come before it.

And while having lots of poor children with JIRAs — and the $ 2,000 in taxpayer contributions that come with those accounts — is infinitely better than any wealth - creating tools currently available to poor children, JIRAs will not sit well with many people.

I know this will draw criticism, but I say if it weren't for all the faithful people of all good religions doing good acts, helping the poor, clothing drives, and on and on, this world would be in a lot worse shape than if just your average aetheist were in charge of helping those who suffer.

Why do you think that empty school buildings are better than having churches that are helping poor people that are helping people get off drugs, get out of crime and tutoring students of all faiths?»

Although this was better than most doctors or people in our neighborhood, it was a poor showing compared to the rest of the world.

It's interesting that poor people seem to get the tactics of Jesus a little better than people who have resources because they know that you have to take care of each other if you're gonna make it in this world.

Poorer, less well - educated white people refuse surveys more often than affluent, better - educated whites.

On the basis of my working with poor people over many years and of my study of the relevant literature, I believe that «consumption» is a better indicator of poverty than «income,» much of which is unreported, and undetectable except as evidenced in consumption.

If the overal outcome is not positive, than atheism (which doesn't push particular values) might come out neutral and thereby be better for people / the world / the poor or whomever.

And they certainly had better «principles» than these pocket - picking evangelical jerks sucking the money out of poor people.

That means in this instance that economists refuse to judge whether it is better to add to the consumption of one person rather than another, that is, they are unwilling to judge that the increase of wellbeing in toto will be less when a hundred dollars is added to the income of a rich person than when it adds to the income of a poor one.

Working on the principle that it is better to teach a man to fish than give him a fish or a sandwich, people, like the local council, can criticise us for encouraging the poor rather than helping them to escape poverty.

Christians are not better than non-Christians in no way, shape, or form, just like rich people are not any better than the poor.

on Gays... he said, «Well the «Scripture» says...» on the death penalty he got the phony smile and said... «Well other people know lots more than me... so I don't have an opinion»... The guy is completely hollow... I hope he helps the poor but I doubt it... he is a RIGHT WINGED Fundamentalist in T V «clothing»... he would be the first to show up at a town hanging and grin... and pass the hat...

goodness i can't believe it people will still defend him.You know something when Giroud misses many chances like at Monaco i did not criticize him even based on that you know why?its because he has always not been clinical.The only way a team can improve is by indentifying its problems and solving them.Arsenal has Giroud as the main cf and Welbeck as backup to him.Giroud has done well scoring some goals some too important but collectively he does more harm than good.Do not use moments to judge a player judge him based on content.Giroud does not excel in many games than he excels in games.As a main cf you need to be consistent.I see people here saying Giroud can not dribble he cant do this he cant do that but its a bit crazy to criticize him for that because every player has his own style.Giroud limitations as a player costs arsenal and will cost us a lot.Most importantly his poor finishing which has cost us several times.Not good enough.His style of play is ok for us but a striker who can take on players and run behind defences very well would make us very strong and also should be clinical.For Welbeck he needs to works on his finishing and composure by doing the basic things right.He rushes infront of goal too much.For now he is just above average.However he can excel if he works on improving.Giroud and Welbeck will always be a pain in arsenal's neck for most part.Some will call me stupid but hey at least i want to analyze the problem.People may support Giroud or Welbeck to lead the line next season but as the saying goes if you fool me once shame on you but if you fool me twice shame on me.Will you let Giroud and Welbeck fool you again?

I get your point mate.But in truth Ramsey is the CM and Xhaka is the DM according to our formation anf tactic.It's even debatable if Xhaka is capable of playing DM.I think Ramsey's tactical awareness is poor but he has every right to take risks and move into the opposition box.He's a box to box player.The only problem is Ramsey overdoes it.If we had a proper CDM the team would be more balanced.Now it's like we have two CM's playing in midfield and due to their poor tactical awareness we're always left exposed.I conclude by reminding people that Wilshere is better footballer and is more intelligent than Xhaka.It'll be better playing Wilshere and pairing him with a CDM than having Xhaka play there.He just gets to play over him becausr we signed him for # 35.

See how poor nacho monreal was today yet people never criticize him.Gibbs should start over him next week.Yet people would say things like Gibbs is shit despite him being very consistent for arsenal.The only problem to me with Gibbs is that sometimes in some matches he gets caught out too much apart from that he is a better left back than Monreal and when both are at full pelt Gibbs is still better.I just do nt get it i watch the two of them play and i do nt know what makes Monreal better than him.

His athleticism, size and defensive - minded game remain good selling points for a combo guard, but he needs to convince people his three - point shooting can swing closer to last season (34.7 %) than this year's poor 26.7 % mark.

Owen wrote on Sportlobster.com: «Arsenal played poor on the night, but the only people surprised are those who continue to believe they are better than they are.

Just hope wenger starts him Campbell and elmeny... Despite their position need our strongest side out... 3 points from last 9 would be a very poor haul for an aspiring champion... Would leave us 3 above spurs who are way better than people on this sight want to credit and still only 8 points above one of the most haplessly managed man utd sides in a long time....

And I do not know what planet you are from, but poor people have better health insurance than the rich.

A study comparing the sleep habits of good sleepers and poor sleepers noted the people with worse - quality sleep spent more time on their backs than the good sleepers (Sleep positions in the young adult and their relationship with the subjective quality of sleep.

«Although well intentioned, the last Government received very little for their money in terms of social mobility and a reduction in the gap between the rich and the poor, and they have further fuelled a culture of benefit dependency in which children grow up seeing parents and grandparents who have never worked as their role models, in which people are better off living apart than living together, and in which there is no incentive to work because of the fear of becoming worse off.

There is no need to accuse people of poor planning to realize that a rational citizen may well decide that money is better spent on near - term expenses (for example, their children's education) than on saving for an unlikely event.

The government pension plan is funded via taxes and pays out a means tested amount, so well to do people get less (possibly nothing) than poor people do.

It might not go down very well, but not all benefits are universal — I think Labour needs to bite the bullet and do what makes economic sense to most people rather than stick to vague arguments that «if the rich don't get it, they won't want it given to the poor»

Change you name to Economic Terrorist Mike as its evident you're more concerned with wealthy environmental billionaires than you are helping the middle class and poor people upstate have a good economic opportunity.

On the other hand, I'd remind Mr Gallo that he has no right to do other than the best job for his city, that he is obligated to keep his eye on the ball... Mr Sottile well demonstrated what poor management of people can do... along with my respect for Mr Gallo is the respect I have for the reporting in the Kingston Times... Again and again this mayor lets the newspapers carry vital city information and the City and the Mayor do not speak for themselves in the form of internet based releases... Ms Fuentes did not deserve to be fired in the newspaper... By the very fact that Ms Fuentes was selected by the Mayor, he owes her and the city a reason for her separation from the administration.

A better tool to target help for poor working people, they say, is the income tax credit that can boost hourly income for workers to more than $ 10 an hour, according to Russell Sykes, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute's Empire Center for New York State Policy.

- GDP per capita is still lower than it was before the recession - Earnings and household incomes are far lower in real terms than they were in 2010 - Five million people earn less than the Living Wage - George Osborne has failed to balance the Budget by 2015, meaning 40 % of the work must be done in the next parliament - Absolute poverty increased by 300,000 between 2010/11 and 2012/13 - Almost two - thirds of poor children fail to achieve the basics of five GCSEs including English and maths - Children eligible for free school meals remain far less likely to be school - ready than their peers - Childcare affordability and availability means many parents struggle to return to work - Poor children are less likely to be taught by the best teachers - The education system is currently going through widespread reform and the full effects will not be seen for some time - Long - term youth unemployment of over 12 months is nearly double pre-recession levels at around 200,000 - Pay of young people took a severe hit over the recession and is yet to recover - The number of students from state schools and disadvantaged backgrounds going to Russell Group universities has flatlined for a depoor children fail to achieve the basics of five GCSEs including English and maths - Children eligible for free school meals remain far less likely to be school - ready than their peers - Childcare affordability and availability means many parents struggle to return to work - Poor children are less likely to be taught by the best teachers - The education system is currently going through widespread reform and the full effects will not be seen for some time - Long - term youth unemployment of over 12 months is nearly double pre-recession levels at around 200,000 - Pay of young people took a severe hit over the recession and is yet to recover - The number of students from state schools and disadvantaged backgrounds going to Russell Group universities has flatlined for a dePoor children are less likely to be taught by the best teachers - The education system is currently going through widespread reform and the full effects will not be seen for some time - Long - term youth unemployment of over 12 months is nearly double pre-recession levels at around 200,000 - Pay of young people took a severe hit over the recession and is yet to recover - The number of students from state schools and disadvantaged backgrounds going to Russell Group universities has flatlined for a decade

«Welfare needs to become an engine of mobility, changing people's lives for the better, rather than a giant cheque written by the State to compensate the poor for their predicament.»

«The results showed that people who faced poor socio - economic circumstances in childhood had on average less muscular strength than those who were better off in their early years,» explains Boris Cheval.

People with poor sense of smell were nearly five times more likely to develop the disease than people with a good sense of People with poor sense of smell were nearly five times more likely to develop the disease than people with a good sense of people with a good sense of smell.

So for now, at least, we would do better to focus on helping poor people to overcome their disadvantages than to worry about the prospect of idiocracy.

But most of the bones were buried in wooden coffins outside the churchyard and probably were those of poorer rural people, whose daily lives are less well known than the nobility of cities.

Grandparents» health was also a factor in youths» views on ageism: Young people with grandparents in poor health were more likely to hold ageist views than youths with grandparents in better health.

The results also showed that people with hearing difficulties perceived their ability to live their lives as they would like as poorer than those with good hearing.

Example: If people with good health markers have a higher intake of pomegranates than those with poor health markers, the headline might read, «Pomegranates lead to a 30 % decrease in blood pressure, study suggests ``.

It is quite probable that people who consume x amount of low nutrient density wheat will have poorer health outcomes than people who consume x amount of higher nutrient density wheat from more fertile soil, simply because assuming both have the same amount of phytate, the later will have much higher levels of essential co-factor vitamins and minerals that contribute to better health.

An important corollary of this basic lesson is that people with more money tend to be better organized and effective at protecting their interests than poor people.

WASHINGTON — Nearly half of all adult Americans can not read, write, and calculate well enough to function fully in today's society, and people in their early 20's have poorer literacy skills than did those in a 1985 survey, according to a federal study.

In every part of England, a poorer young person is less likely to get a placement than their better - off peers.

Ms Greening said that it was «wrong» that as a result of this, «young people from more disadvantaged, poorer backgrounds are coming out with more debt than their better - off peers».

While not all people who are gifted are well off, generally speaking there are more gifted people who are well off than are poor.

«There are probably better ways to motivate people than with cash,» Heckman said, «and it's unfair for really poor students and parents.»

Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox ENGINE PERFORMANCE AND GEAR BOX MUCH BETTER THAN OTHERS IN IT SEGMENT, EXCEPT FUEL ECONOMY, POOR MILEAGE IN TOWN, I TRIED IN ALL POSSIBLE WAYS AS SUGGESTED BY COMPANY PERSONS TO TAKE CARE TO GET BEST MILEAGE BUT FINALLY THE MILEAGE WAS NOT UP TO MARK AS CLAIMED BY THE COMPANY, AND IT MATTERS A LOT SO HOPE COMPANY WILL TAKE CARE OF THIS PART IN FUTURE MODELS.

That wouldn't be surprising, and if trendier genres attracted more companies than good business people and editors to support them, I could easily see some genres being overwhelmed by poor quality digital - first publishers.

Subprime loans were mortgages with higher interest rates than conventional mortgages offered to people with low incomes or poor credit or who simply failed to shop around and understand they qualified for better rates.

Therefore, secured installment contracts often work better for people with poor credit history than their unsecured cousins.

This means that lenders of poor credit loans will charge more for loans for people with bad credit than for good credit.