Sentences with phrase «better than science»

Oreskes» short, obscure essay titled, «My Science is Better than Your Science,» continues the characterization of skeptics as paid hacks of the fossil fuel industry.

A short, obscure, error - riddled essay titled, «My Science is Better than Your Science,» that she wrote in 2011 is more significant.

«#ScienceMarch also represents a tragic lost opportunity to do better than science's racist, sexist, ableist, colonialist, oppressive past,» she tweeted.

Who better than science journalists to help invent the news delivery systems of the future?

Sometimes these imperfect human beings find things like arts and literature that explain the truth of what is to be human better than science and history.

Not exact matches

Amid all the angst about the small percentage of women who work in computer science, a new research paper has a surprising finding: Women may actually be better coders than men.

As far as elementary school goes, there is perhaps no better platform for innovation than science fairs, which give kids an opportunity to explore a subject they love, and solve problems of their own design.

Microsoft and the China University of Technology and Science taught a computer network how to take an IQ test, and it scored better than a college postgraduate.

«Their negative emotions decreased more than those in the other groups, and they also felt less depressed and more emotionally balanced than when they started,» reports the UC Berkeley Greater Good Science Center's write - up of the research.

More than 160 people caught colds for science in an effort to better understand how sleep impacts our immune systems.

One couldn't have put it better than a Christian Science Monitor headline did yesterday: «For Keystone XL foes, oozing Canadian crude in Arkansas spill is black gold.»

The study, just published in Science, showed that the creation of what the researchers are calling microtumors can help predict drug effectiveness in cancer patients better than the current standard method of testing the drugs on rodents.

«His endorsement [that we make the best ball] is more valuable than all of the science and data that we throw out to the consumers,» Bridgestone CEO Angel Ilagan told the outlet.

Even science - and you know it better than I do - points to an understanding of reality as a place where every element connects and interacts with everything else,» the pope said.

«I'm a believer that good selling is more of a science than an art.

Customer service isn't rocket science, and these tips will help you learn how to deliver it better than your competition.

Research shows that happiness has positive effects on our brains, and it's certainly a pleasant turn of luck to be born with a sunny disposition, but according to science if you weren't so fortunate and naturally tend towards pessimism, trying to remake yourself into more of an optimist is probably doing more harm than good.

The ensuing rush of fresh talent, including stunt master Devin Super Tramp, singer Sam Tsui, and science geek Emily Graslie, has been good for YouTube, which says more than 1 billion people worldwide visit the site on a monthly basis, up 25 percent from the previous year.

In an unsurprising surprise, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk made good on his Friday promise and debuted the first official footage of Falcon Heavy's inaugural flight, pieced together by none other than the co-creators of the science fiction show Westworld.

(Barron's) • In Search of the Perfect Recession Indicator (Philosophical Economics) • A Fireside Chat With Charlie Munger (MoneyBeat) • Complexity theory and financial regulation (Science) • Five Pieces of Conventional Wisdom That Make Smart Investors Look Dumb (CFA Institute) • This Lawyer Is Hollywood's Complete Divorce Solution (Bloomberg) • Curiosity update, sols 1218 - 1249: Digging in the sand at Mar's Bagnold Dunes (Planetary Society) • The Plot to Take Down a Fox News Analyst (NYT) • Ask the aged: Who better to answer questions about the purpose of life than someone who has been living theirs for a long time?

A colleague of mine, Stephen Zarlenga, has just published a historical study, The Lost Science of Money (2002), showing that public - sector fiat money has a much better record than privately created fiat money.

After several bad hires that we initially thought were a perfect fit — we realized that science and technology are probably better predictors of sales success than we are.

Leveraging the science and art of sales to build an inside sales function requires more than hiring people who sell themselves well during an interview.

We know from various studies done in the social sciences in the past forty years, as well as from fifteen plus years of my being involved with personas, the trio of users / buyers / customers makes decisions based on much more than just content or information.

We don't know much about the author other than he appears to have no professional financial background or qualifications, is well - qualified in computer science and claims experience in data science and simulation.

She authored the award - winning book slide: ology: The Art and Science of Creating Great Presentations, where more than 20 years of experience is distilled into visual - communication best practices.

Kansas City fared better than New York City and Los Angeles in metrics such as tech workers per capita, share of workers with a Bachelor's degree or higher, entrepreneurial growth and share of «knowledge» workers, defined as those in occupations such as architecture, social science, health care and education.

Mainstream science needs a better challenge than that.

What you have done in logic and scientific terms is, we do not know, science does not know, so let's make something up (the supernatural) and we'll use that since a made up reason is better than no answer.

And to all the people who think that science is cold and heartless with no soul or hope as opposed to religion which is warm and fuzzy and gives people hope: how many lives does science save every single day as opposed to religion; clothe people; keep them warm; let them communicate better; let them eat better and live in better safety than what religion could ever, or has ever, provided?

In truth Intelligent Design is really nothing more than a Relgious Belief given the cloak of Science, but from a Scientific perspective it is only a Hypothosis at best.

@tf — I know better than to expect you to understand the relevant science here, but Strobel was at the very least, negligent in publishing such a misrepresentation.

Being LGBT is not a choice (regardless of what the 2000 year old book states, science says different and it is what science states that matters in the real world), there is no cure for it and there are plenty of people who are LGBT that are better christians than you could ever wish to be.

Rather than working to tearing down this wall and making the world a better place, American society and the media continually shore up this separation between «faith» and reason, hence the comparitively sorry state of science and research in our country today.

My Princeton political science colleagues Nolan McCarty and Howard Rosenthal, together with Keith Poole at the University of Houston, have done a statistical analysis showing that the voting behavior of a congressman is much better predicted by his party affiliation today than it was 25 years ago.

There are people who believe in God who actually demonstrate a better understanding of science, logic and reason than Lucifer's Evil Twin.

Its not rocket science... its just finding out for your self, rather than the good «ol hear - say.

Faith leaders have a better shot than celebrities at changing the narrative about religion and science.

Because of this, today more than ever before, our science and technology must be directed away from the paths of destruction and into the search for the conditions demanded for the creation of human good.

As I'll discuss at the end of my presentation, political science only does this by dint of a systematic abstraction of our lived political experience, that is, by singularly emphasizing politics as the management of a conflict of interests rather than the prudential navigation of conflicts between competing claims to honor, or of competing claims to the good.

I have great respect for what he did for science... I don't give a f» k about your understanding of god... that opinion is no better than any other BS position.

He was simply stating that we understand science much better now than we did in the Colonial times, and thus understand the causes behind hurricanes and other natural disasters.

Also science has way better answers than you're giving credit for.

That is why science exists to prove what is real and not... in a couple millennium man may understand better than today.

Israeli Jews have a much better grasp of science than the average American.

A theory is a model that best explains observed phenomena, their is no higher level in science than a theory.

By and large the best art is a better guide to reality than the trendy orthodoxy purveyed as social science.

Science gets better, and what we thought now is not likely to be shown entirely wrong tomorrow... it might be shown wrong, but in a minor way, needing a more intricate correction rather than a total earth shattering removal of what we believe.

Civil liberties are still quite high (though W tried to do them in), medical science has allowed people to live longer and better, crime has generally been trending downwards for decades, and the average American lives far, far better than his predecessors 70 years ago.

Perhaps the best argument against a super-intelligent agent creating the universe is that moderately - intelligent science fiction writers often dream up universes that are way cooler and often even «work» better than the reality we all experience.