Sentences with phrase «better than students in traditional public schools»

Not exact matches

Charter school students in grades 3 through 8 perform better than we would expect, based on the performance of comparable students in traditional public schools, on both the math and reading portions of New York's statewide achievement tests.

Here is what we know: students in urban areas do significantly better in school if they attend a charter schools than if they attend a traditional public school.

Even if a charter or private school were no better than a traditional forced - choice public school, the fact that parents and students themselves choose the school may mean they perceive distinct advantages in it, real or not.

(p. 222) It does not seem unfair to expect the authors to provide evidence, other than the fact of differentiation, to support these assertions, or to say what is being done in traditional public schools that better prepares students for life in a democratic society.

In general, charter schools that serve low - income and minority students in urban areas are doing a better job than their traditional public - school counterparts in raising student achievement, whereas that is not true of charter schools in suburban areaIn general, charter schools that serve low - income and minority students in urban areas are doing a better job than their traditional public - school counterparts in raising student achievement, whereas that is not true of charter schools in suburban areain urban areas are doing a better job than their traditional public - school counterparts in raising student achievement, whereas that is not true of charter schools in suburban areain raising student achievement, whereas that is not true of charter schools in suburban areain suburban areas.

While urban students overall do better in charter schools than in traditional public schools — a conclusion found by rigorous studies that account for any potential differences in the students going in — the gap varies tremendously from place to place.

In the first broad attempts to analyze the performance of Hawaii's charter schools, the state Department of Education and the Hawaii's Educational Policy Center have found that charter - school students are doing as well as or better than students at traditional public schools on the state's proficiency tests.

News Release: San Antonio (December 13, 2017)-- Texas students in charter schools are not necessarily faring better than their peers in traditional public schools.

Texas students in charter schools are not necessarily faring better than their peers in traditional public schools.

Students in poverty do better in public charter schools in Ohio than they do in traditional public schools.

The study of charter schools in 15 states and the District of Columbia found that, nationally, only 17 % of charter schools do better academically than their traditional counterparts, and more than a third «deliver learning results that are significantly worse than their student [s] would have realized had they remained in traditional public schools.»

«In her blog, Weingarten states, «A well - regarded Stanford University study found that charter school students were doing only slightly better in reading than students in traditional public schools, but at the same time doing slightly worse in math.&raquIn her blog, Weingarten states, «A well - regarded Stanford University study found that charter school students were doing only slightly better in reading than students in traditional public schools, but at the same time doing slightly worse in math.&raquin reading than students in traditional public schools, but at the same time doing slightly worse in math.&raquin traditional public schools, but at the same time doing slightly worse in math.&raquin math.»

The mission of the SCSC is to improve public education by authorizing high quality charter schools that provide students with better educational opportunities than they would otherwise receive in traditional district schools.

He found that the studies show that while there are some examples of success, particularly in large urban school districts that primarily serve students of color like those in New York City and Boston, they also show that across the nation, there is little evidence that charters do better than traditional public schools when it comes to student test scores.

Our approach is paying off, as African - American and Latino student achievement is better than in traditional public schools on any comparison, be it by state, by district, and particularly by neighborhood.

In 20 of 22 comparisons, the achievement gap was actually lower — and better — for charter school students than for students in traditional public schoolIn 20 of 22 comparisons, the achievement gap was actually lower — and better — for charter school students than for students in traditional public schoolin traditional public schools.

Given that many more students in charter schools have the advantages of a positive family structure, a peer group that is a positive influence, and their own inner drive that many students in traditional public schools do not, it is reasonable to expect that charter school students would perform very much better than they do.

For example, a family that takes the time and effort to apply to a charter school, might be more involved in their student's education than a family that just sends their student to the neighborhood school, and that might be why we see choice school students performing better than the traditional public school students.

However, students who attended public schools that were granted considerable autonomy but kept the union — known as «pilot» schools — performed no better than they would have had they remained in a traditional Boston public school.

An analysis of 2011 - 12 MEAP results by the Michigan Association of Public School Academies concludes that black urban students perform better in charter schools than in traditional public schools in both math and readPublic School Academies concludes that black urban students perform better in charter schools than in traditional public schools in both math and readpublic schools in both math and reading...

A well - regarded Stanford University study found that charter school students were doing only slightly better in reading than students in traditional public schools, but at the same time doing slightly worse in math.

Although some individual charter schools have their struggles, the study suggests that students who attend charters generally may be better off than if they had gone to traditional public schools in their communities.

The numbers, distributed at recent speeches by Mecklenburg County attorney Richard Vinroot, a former Charlotte mayor and GOP gubernatorial candidate who's a major figure in North Carolina's school choice movement, claim that the state's charters serve a greater percentage of students who qualify for free and reduced lunch as well as special education classes than do traditional public schools.