Sentences with phrase «better than the freedom»

For a Jewish Renewal perspective on the Exodus, you can't do better than Freedom Journeys, co-authored by Rabbi Arthur Waskow and Rabbi Phyllis Berman, which I reviewed for Zeek a while back.

Families who see this movie should talk about Memnon's claim that order was better than freedom.

But, if you don't plan to use other Chase credit cards, you can do better than the Freedom Unlimited if you're looking for a simple flat - rate cash back card.

And I would prefer to travel Solo as long as I can, because there is nothing better than the freedom it provides.

Not exact matches

Paying homage to the comics Other than cashing in on video games — the LEGO Batman games are leading Activision Blizzard's (Nasdaq: ATVI) The Amazing Spider - Man on the charts as of this writing — it isn't yet clear how Warner will make good on this freedom.

And it is business owners like Andrew who can do this better than any politician, assuming he's given the freedom.

Richard Cooper, for his part, insists Total Debt Freedom serves its clients better than his American competitors, even if his business model is virtually identical.

If you're a business owner who has emergency savings — or what I call a «freedom fund» — this statistic also shows you're in decent shape and better off than most.

The high freedom Googlers are given to recognize one another as important and for doing good work fosters a culture of recognition and service, helping Googlers to «think like owners rather than serfs.»

However, as we noted above, if you have the Chase Sapphire Preferred ® Card as well, the effective rewards rate on the Chase Freedom Unlimited ® can be higher than 2 %, provided you transfer your points and get a value better than $ 0.0134 per point.

[01:10] Introduction [02:45] James welcomes Tony to the podcast [03:35] Tony's leap year birthday [04:15] Unshakeable delivers the specific facts you need to know [04:45] What James learned from Unshakeable [05:25] Most people panic when the stock market drops [05:45] Getting rid of your fear of investing [06:15] Last January was the worst opening, but it was a correction [06:45] You are losing money when you sell on corrections [06:55] Bear markets come every 5 years on average [07:10] The greatest opportunity for a millennial [07:40] Waiting for corrections to invest [08:05] Warren Buffet's advice for investors [08:55] If you miss the top 10 trading days a year... [09:25] Three different investor scenarios over a 20 year period [10:40] The best trading days come after the worst [11:45] Investing in the current world [12:05] What Clinton and Bush think of the current situation [12:45] The office is far bigger than the occupant [13:35] Information helps reduce fear [14:25] James's story of the billionaire upset over another's wealth [14:45] What money really is [15:05] The story of Adolphe Merkle [16:05] The story of Chuck Feeney [16:55] The importance of the right mindset [17:15] What fuels Tony [19:15] Find something you care about more than yourself [20:25] Make your mission to surround yourself with the right people [21:25] Suffering made Tony hungry for more [23:25] By feeding his mind, Tony found strength [24:15] Great ideas don't interrupt you, you have to pursue them [25:05] Never - ending hunger is what matters [25:25] Richard Branson is the epitome of hunger and drive [25:40] Hunger is the common denominator [26:30] What you can do starting right now [26:55] Success leaves clues [28:10] What it means to take massive action [28:30] Taking action commits you to following through [29:40] If you do nothing you'll learn nothing [30:20] There must be an emotional purpose behind what you're doing [30:40] How does Tony ignite creativity in his own life [32:00] «How is not as important as «why» [32:40] What and why unleash the psyche [33:25] Breaking the habit of focusing on «how» [35:50] Deep Practice [35:10] Your desired outcome will determine your action [36:00] The difference between «what» and «why» [37:00] Learning how to chunk and group [37:40] Don't mistake movement for achievement [38:30] Tony doesn't negotiate with his mind [39:30] Change your thoughts and change your biochemistry [40:00] The bad habit of being stressed [40:40] Beautiful and suffering states [41:50] The most important decision is to live in a beautiful state no matter what [42:40] Consciously decide to take yourself out of suffering [43:40] Focus on appreciation, joy and love [44:30] Step out of suffering and find the solution [45:00] Dealing with mercury poisoning [45:40] Tony's process for stepping out of suffering [46:10] Stop identifying with thoughts — they aren't yours [47:40] Trade your expectations for appreciation [50:00] The key to life — gratitude [51:40] What is freedom for you?

In some past monetary arrangements, most notably that of Scotland before 1845, banks came very close to achieving this ideal, thanks to the their freedom to supply their customers with circulating paper banknotes as well as with deposits, and to the fact that between them these two substitutes could serve every purpose coins might serve, and do so more conveniently than coins themselves.

One of our favorite cards for its cash back rewards and other perks, the Chase Freedom Unlimited is an ideal card for anyone seeking an uncomplicated rewards card that earns better - than - average rewards on all of their spending.

I also think many well meaning Christians are often distracted by a few social issues (things that I believe are personal and have more to do with our precious American freedoms than religion) and lose site of the larger picture.

Virginity is technically better because it allows more freedom to «have [one's] thoughts of the things of Lord,» but — and this is important — it is very possible for a married woman to be holier than an unmarried woman, because there «may be virginity without obedience.»

Reflect on this a little: Many of the inspirations of the threefold system of political economy derive from evangelical inspirations such as personal creativity, personal responsibility, freedom, the love for community through association and mutual cooperation, the aim of bettering the condition of every person on earth, the cultivation of the rule of law, respect for the natural rights of others, the preference for persuasion by reason rather than by coercion, and a powerful sense of sin.

Although the book is best regarded more as a presentation of the Supreme Court's religious - freedom work than as a direct study of the questions underlying that work» the work of constitutional scholars, for example, is for the most part only referenced, not engaged» it is, nonetheless, recommended.

And thank you America for the freedom of speech you granted the world and has provided us the utilities of communications asking us to contribute with our expressions towards» Change for the Good of ship and passengers on board» since there is no Ark better than earth to save us in this wide unpredictable space?!

To Jefferson, Protestant denominations were no better than the Roman Catholic Church: all stood as enemies of mental freedom, and all were therefore anathema to lovers of liberty and - the true Supreme Being for Jefferson - «Reason.»

But I grasp what it means to realize His Freedom, and more importantly, what Living from that Freedom looks like, far better now than before this process started.

Marx made life under capitalism seem much worse than it actually is, and he didn't spend a lot of time talking about the good side of modern prosperity and freedom.

The kind of action from social awareness that is demanded by perfect love is such as must admit the tragic reality that there are people who are genuinely intent upon using their freedom to destroy the freedom of others, and that, under certain circumstances, love itself may dictate that «It is better that many should die prematurely than that nearly all men should live in a permanent state of hostility or slavery» (MVG 173).

I have wondered this for a long time — why do they think that making God into a puppet - master makes him greater than a God who can bring about His highest good amidst our freedom?

I would argue that America was founded by well educated rich land / slave owning white dudes who wanted more of the cut of the pie, than they were «freedom fighters.»

It is to admit that there is good we might in our freedom accomplish which we should not attempt, because what we do counts for even more than what we accomplish.

More important and more difficult to deal with than such differences in teaching on will and freedom, however, is a wall known only too well by those of us who have worked with Omega to help it make its Point: the wall of what Catholics are tempted pridefully to call pietistic faith and what Protestants are tempted cynically to call superstition.

It breaks itself free from the ties of bondage, finds new found freedom, prospers in it until it is realized that some people do better than others.

But neither of them, any more than Tocqueville a few decades later, proposed an alternative theory in which freedom would be answerable to a fully knowable Order or the right could be logically derived from The Good.

It seems to me that atheists have a better grip on the application of religious freedom than christians do.

Better than many churchmen, he understood that human rights pressures on the Soviet Union served the broader cause of freedom and gave a measure of protection to human rights activists and dissidents.

If we assume, as we presently do, that the primary goal of both God and concerned humans is to maximize freedom (creativity) for the greatest number, it is the following query with which we must be concerned: Do continuous divine persuasion and occasional human coercion, in conjunction, better maximize freedom than would continuous divine persuasion alone?

First, if «freedom» is from God's perspective a higher good than «justice», then it is difficult to see why it should not also be so for us.

If, on the plane of moral evil rather than physical or «natural» evil, one replies that with the real freedom of the free will goes the real power of personal sanctifying grace to sweeten and transform our personalities if we will allow Him, the rejoinder comes, «well, yes, but if He is almighty why does He not stop me from sinning and going to hell?»

Some think Christians can better defend their freedoms using carrots rather than sticks.

We, think we are better than God, we judge everything with our limited mindset, thinking we can create a world of freedom through love and peace.

In the past twelve years of intense struggle, more than 36,000 have been killed, including «terrorist» freedom fighters, as well as soldiers, police, and civilians.

The best way to combat terrorism is to promote freedom, and what better place to do it than NYC?

As you well know actions speak far louder than words, and this would demonstrate to non-Muslims how truly sincere the majority of Muslims in America are in understanding the unrest and potential violence that the construction of this Mosque would most certainly bring, regardless of their freedom to do so.

... we see human freedom, in its truest and best sense, as freedom - for - God, rather than freedom - against - God...

Anyone who has been engaged in teaching is well aware of the fact that there is no surer way to kill interest, and we may add no more certain way to destroy the sense of Christian freedom, than by dogmatic teaching in the worse sense of the term.

(1) If there were a good and powerful God, he would in some respects allow freedom using only persuasive power; but if he were good and powerful, he would use more coercive power to prevent destructive evil than is apparently being used in the world.

It seems to me that Ford as well as his colleagues hands human freedom a stacked deck, more stacked than experience indicates.

Much more than any unitary socialist system, the threefold system of democratic capitalism — which honors political, economic and moral - cultural freedoms — tends to call forth individual and collective efforts that contribute to the common good.

Not feeding hungry or pay charity as should or storing money abroad in banks or holes under ground rather than investing it to generate business and good living for the nation nor even the slightest right of freedom!

However, within this freedom neurosis has increased rather than abated, and the removal of inhibitions has contributed not only to the disintegration of family life but to the disintegration of personality as well.

Our age is one where few things are more highly prized than freedom; yet few people are taught the first truth about freedom: that it can be exercised well or badly, that it can grow or be lost, that one does not truly love freedom if one loves only one's own freedom and has no regard for the freedom of others.

As a workplace for that quest, I could ask for no better environment than a graduate school committed to freedom and excellence (those twin virtues of the university) yet giving place to piety through the limited pluralism of a clear - voiced evangelicalism.

Ministers and Church reacted against Garrison's statement that they were «blind leaders of the blind, dumb dogs that can not bark, spiritual popes — that they love the fleece better than the flock — that they are mighty hindrances to the cause of freedom.»

Suffice it to say that the conceptuality which I accept — and accept because it seems to do justice to deep analysis of human experience and observation, as well as to the knowledge we now have of the way «things go» in the world — lays stress on the dynamic «event» character of that world; on the inter-relationships which exist in what is a societal universe, on the inadequacy of «substance» thinking to describe such a universe of «becoming» and «belonging», on the place of decisions in freedom by the creatures with the consequences which such decisions bring about, and on the central importance of persuasion rather than coercive force as a clue to the «going» of things in that universe.

If my colleague Brad Gregory's historical assessment is true, and if Ephraim Radner's «Protestant version» of the Reformation's purported beneficial effects» that it «gave us back our consciences, granted us freedom, unleashed reason,» etc., and has given rise to modern secular institutions that have exercised caritas even better than have Christian institutions» are arguable if not actually overstated, what then are modern Christians (Protestant and Catholic) to do in the face of contemporary culture's relentless hostility to sacred things?