Sentences with phrase «better than the other sides»
Know your case better than the other side.
https://www.lawyer-monthly.com/
I am glad you mentioned knowing your case better than the other sides.
Not exact matches
To test your idea, look at other businesses in your industry to see if your side hustle is better than or different from what's already being done.
There is a side mesh pouch perfect for an adult's water bottle and more than enough room in the two main compartments to carry all of your baby's needed gear — spare onesie, food pouches, stuffed bear, etc. — as well as your camera, route map, some snacks, and the other stuff you want to bring along for the journey.
I had a steady paycheck (even if it was small), free health insurance, dental, housing (single Marine barracks life), and chow... yet I was convinced that the grass on the other side was greener and more well - manicured than the base general's lawn.
For most self - employed people (including employees who get a W - 2 from their boss but also run a business on the side), however, the individual 401 (k) is better than other plans like the SEP IRA or Keogh.
Early this week I was with an Australian government representative in Beijing whom I have known for many years and he told me that iron ore prices were currently around $ 83 (I think they dropped another $ 2 last week), and that while some people in Canberra were reluctant to say it too loudly, he and others were increasingly in agreement with my lower forecast of less than $ 50 well before the end of the decade, in part because supply has come off much more slowly than predicted, but mainly because they now recognize that China's rebalancing was indeed going to be a far bigger deal for Chinese demand than sell - side research had predicted.
For all our stock and ETF trade entries on the long side (other than trend reversal plays), we must first verify there is already a well defined uptrend in place before buying.
The concept of once saved always saved takes a bit to get your head around but Gods grace is greater than our sin and greater than our good works it just takes faith in Jesus Christ to recieve Gods grace.In saying that to continue to sin as a christian is like playing with fire you will be burnt.Paul talks of the sexual immorality in corinthian church of the son and father that were sleeping with the same wife they were excommunicated from the church the members were not allowed to even eat with them until they repented.There are consequences for our actions.The other side to this is that if you continue to sin as a christian you are not walking by faith but walking by the flesh and are really backsliding.In the backslidden state you also become powerless and open to attack by satan as long as we walk in the flesh he can influence us to get worse not better.If we are walking in Christ satan may still try to tempt us but we are empowered by the holy spirit and overcome him and our faith increases.Both are saved by grace but one is powerless because of sin versus saved but an overcomer having been set free from sin i think this is what Paul was trying to explain.It is better to be an overcomer than overcome by sin.brentnz
«I told him whatever he created on the other side of the wall would be so much better and stronger than where he was right now.»
And there are, but when those other ways fail, well Oh a side note to apparently an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth meant no more than an eye for an eye or a tooth for a tooth, which makes it quite logical.
However, I have learned the hard way that deconstruction can be done in a way that gets you to the other side better off than you were before your deconstruction commenced.
I rather have a placebo with no side effects than your best crafted chemically produced scientific cure that gives me a thousand other symptoms in the long run.
They are Madisonian pluralists who stress Federalist Paper No. 45 as the preferred side of Madison: «The public good, the real welfare of the great body of the people, is the supreme object to be pursued: and that no form of government whatever has any other value than as it may be fitted for the attainment of this object.»
Amazing sweet smooth flavor, but more on the subtle side, I expected a richer flavor, but it is a bit dull, so you have to add more than few drops to get the desirable vanilla flavor, the good side is that it not bitter, but rather sweet, and doesn't cause tongue numbness like some other types I used, I used it for chees cake and the flavor is just right, my only complain would be the small container for the price, as I said it is not robust, you will get through the bottle in no time if you like vanilla as my family do
Measure 400 ml and you are good to go (all pyrex measuring mugs have ml on the other side - it's a lot easier than measuring 13.5 liquid ounces).
When cooked, French Green Lentils hold their shape better than other lentils, so they are excellent in soups, in warm or cold salads, and as a standalone side dish or entree.
What other better side dish than this roasted Brussels sprouts with cranberries and pine nuts for this time of the year?
Loved the post today as I to am one who fears change, I know change is enevidable and it can be good for us but I cringe at change most times but most times than not when u get to the other side of it and have survived u can look at it differently and understand it and sometimes appreciate it.
(Now just trying to figure out what would be good sides to serve with this other than bread since my son has decided to go gluten free.)
One of the best things, other than gathering with family and friends, is the sheer smorgasbord of side dishes that go along with the meal.
Having said that, better players tend to make a batter team and some can be more important than others, especially if they bring balance to a side and make it complete in a way that no other player in the squad can.
He has been called the best number 10 in the world for his creative ability and he has just taken that shirt number for the Germany national side, where it's previous holder was none other than the former Arsenal striker Lukas Podolski.
The problem is our defence and cdm Flamini: always help the other side Arteta: never was the player than we expect him, he injured most of the time, and lost the ball in dangerous situation Per: he is good just in corners but he is lazy and slow Our good defender is just kosc and chambers And also debuchy but we must play with out him aleast 1 month Gibbs and monreal are good players but they are not good defence So we are very delicate in big and important games
On the other hand, I did think that Ozil played better today than the previous few times I've seen him — he made some comment mid-week to the effect that he's there to provide the artistic side of the game and not to do battle, so maybe that's all we can expect from him.
Don't you think he may be on a better position to judge than someone on the other side of the world that watches highlight and think they know everything?
Even the title I have put at the top of this post could be seen as a bit on the harsh side on the 28 - year old, as he scored 19 goals for the Gunners last season, at a ratio of just better than one every other game, and he already has three for the new season so far, despite being well down the pecking order of forward players available to the boss.
but its a bit sad to see that i as i know more about arsenal fans than other fans, to say from the bottom of my heart, that the fans on here are as worse as the worst if not the worst fans out there... arsenal being on a run, with özil scoring one of the best goals i have ever seen on tuesday, draws against the best defensive side in the league and no they arent stoke city or something they are SPURS equally title challenger as any of arsenal man city, man united, chelsea, liverpool, a team that sent man city home when they (city) looked unbeatable..
Most heard Grzegorz Krychowiak this summer and are rating him higher than the le Coq, but the stats which say le Coq is better than him don't mean a thing, come on guys, the grass is not always greener on the other side.
Pep Guardiola will know him better than the others given that his City side came directly up against Monaco in the Champions League round - of - 16 stage, and evidently the Spanish tactician saw something he liked to warrant his interest in signing Mendy.
Later in your comment, you seem to understand how smack - talk / playful ribbing of a rival / long - time opponent works: Both sides cherry - pick facts to either make fun of the other team, pump up our own team or make our team look better than the other guy's team.
The fact the teams we played were awful doesn't matter he was the best player on the pitch both games and we had strong sides out for both meaning he was better than our other 9 outfield players
Usually guys either have a favorite side or only played one side all the time in college, and if they did switch sides, they were way better at pass rushing on one side than the other.
Well it might not have been pretty or anything like the most fluent and creative Arsenal performance of recent years, but did we really expect anyhting other than a battle against the Chelsea side managed by Jose Mourinho?
OF course you can't blame him for everything, but everything football related yes he runs that side of the club without interference from anyone, here is a man who blames everything and everyone other than ever looking at himself when the team loses a game, for how many years has the club been crying out for a world - class dm, he refused to buy player's to compliment ozil and Sanchez, yes 100 percent, a better manager would get more from the same players..
I also think he and Bellerín have a better understanding on that side than the other two.
Anything other than promotion will be seen as a failure for all at the Riverside, so there is genuine pressure to for Monk and his side to get off to a good start in the Black Country.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
In any other instance when a player rebels against the club and coach for whatever reason there is no room for doubt, disciplinary actions must be taken, even when he is your best player...... it could be the case even for SANCHEZ, those words no player is greater than the Club are well understood, the problem in this case is that a growing majority of the Fans are fed up with the Club and Manager, years of frustration, deception nothing changing and doing nothing about it has the great majority of Fans siding with the Player against the Club and Manager...... unfortunately both lost the respect of most ARSENAL fans, there is a revolt brewing YES like every year the difference this year is that losing Sanchez will not go without consequence....
What is he good at others than side passes?
IMO the Fabregas thing was a miss as well, my concern is that he'll miss something again this summer when we are so close and all we need is two perhaps three new additions to make us the perfect squad to challenge, already he's sitting on his hands and the likes of Khedira and Dybala have gone to other sides where else will his prudence prove to be detrimental rather than adventagious??
yeah but i also have to say that he does nt sparkle either: / he did score some goals but whenever i see him in the game i cant really say that he is the one i want to have permanently on the right because he slows the attacks down very often and often passes turn on the wing and passes back, right now he is only better than the ox because he scored 3 goals more i think maybe a bit more, but neither of them do enough, ramsey on the other side when he started on the wing at the start of the season did a lot of things for the build - up i prefer ramsey to campbell... well of course an in form walcott of the season 12/13 would be the dream because in that season he was in my opinion equal if not better than sanchez of the season 14/15 but thats a dream xD
The away side interestingly have more Champions League winners in their squad than any other side in England, and have clearly done well to bring in experienced winners, but today will not be their day.
In goal, Thibaut Courtois had to be at his best for Chelsea to come away with a hard - fought win and clean sheet away to Bournemouth — he certainly fared better than his former Blues team - mate Asmir Begovic on the other side, anyway.
Simmons and Mitchell and 2nd and 3rd in the whole nba in defensive win shares and yet you have one side saying one is clearly better than the other.
Arsenal's away record was superb last season with 11 wins on the road (more than any other side) while their record at Goodison Park is generally good with last season's loss their first since way back in 2007.
Le Coq is a great players in the making but he's way far from being in the same league as some of the other choices that Dechamps has available and this is indicative of the Arsenal problem, half our Squad are not good enough to make thier national sides despite what Le Fraud says about them, lets not forget Cabaye was in our sites ubntil we offered a lower sum than what the magpies wanted and now he's at Palace Le Coq himself was farmed out to Charlton with a view to being dropped by Wenger, circumstances dictated that he had to come back to us and yes he has made an impact but he's NOT as good as is available currently and thats my point.
i really like sanchez to stay with but if he wants to leave he should think twice about it and not forget where we rescued him from at barca also there are not many other footballing sides better suited to his game than arsenal may be man city but there he would have to play the way guardiola wants him to and wouldn, t have the same freedom he enjoys with us and for sure wouldn, t be the main man, he needs to ask some of former players for advise.
On the bright side... we're making more chances than any other team, defence looking good.
You will probably experience one side being weaker than the other as well.