Sentences with phrase «better than the single player»

They don't do anything better than single player RPGs do when it comes to being a single player RPG.

The two player mode is better than the single player and to be honest, the game is perfect if you want to break someone into roguelike slowly.

Better than single player in some ways (it s more fun with a friend!)

Not exact matches

i believe the scouting system of arsenal more than the average fans who watches one MOTM performance of a player in a single match and searches him on youtube to watch his best moments in the last years and thinks that is the next vieira, gilberto etc..

Other than A.J. Pollock and Paul Goldschmidt, who might be the best 1 - 2 player combo in the NL West, if not baseball, I'm not sure if the Diamondbacks have a single sure thing in the lineup.

Don't get me wrong, I rate both players, but the implication they are better than what we have is misplaced after a single game where they play well.

I never put the getting results part into question.But the fact that he's our player and I ike him doesn't mean I'll lie about him.I wouldn't also say he's been better in every single season but just that he's adapted more quickly.As for you picking talent over hardwork that's your opininon.After all it's not like Hazard is lazy though Sanchez works harder than him.

Welbeck is our top scorer not coincidence, dide might not be d most prolific or d most talented, buh dude gives over 100 % single match, sanchez looks sooo unfit, uniterested, plays more to d gallery now and gives d ball away more time than I could imagine, its better to have a committed player who is ready to give his all to d team than having bunch of dudes who cares more about their weekly wages, vrry bad period to miss welbeck

It's a shame really how people are so plastic over here.We seem to change our views so easily.Why can't people just make up their minds?It's like people don't have stance.As I've been saying and will keep saying we have many good players but as good as they are they're overrated.We've just compromised as a club.There are problems in every single role in the team, from defence to attack.Yet these problems will constantly be ignored.Some players are cleary not good enough but say it and the stats lovers will come out.The main problem wrong with the team is the centre.The other problem is Wenger and his misuse of players.I for one don't really rate Ramsey - Xhaka partnership in a sense that it's defensively weak with Xhaka not good enough defensively and Ramsey very inconsistent.The only player excellent defensively in the centre in Arsenal's team is Coquelin and I think he should be playing though many won'tsee why.Look how easily the balls went through the midfield.Coquelin should be partnered with another CM in our current team.People shouldn't deceive themselves Xhaka that Xhaka isn't a DM.He's just not good defensively admit it.We need a DM more than a CM in my opinion or a hybrid like Sanches or Jankto.

It's funny how he said we are better than Liverpool overrall forgetting that in terms of players we were still better than them last season yet the beat us home and away.Liverpool team is not so good yet out of all the top four team they're the ones who play their hearts out.That's why Liverpool didn't lose a single game to a top four team last season though on paper they should have.As for Tottenham if you look at their team they just need a few more signings and consistency so I don't know what's the big deal about them.The painful this is they could've won the league if not for draws.It was a disgrace for any of those two to finish over us last season because on paper it shouldn't be so.This should tell you that it's not all about the team you have.Some it's about luck, sometimes it's about giving your best and sometimes it's just meant to be.

There were too many injuries in 2017 for a single player to have made that much of a difference, even though the 2017 team was better overall than 2012 notwithstanding the non-sustainable «gimmic» offence.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Not a single draft analyst has him ranked less than 5th best overall player in the draft, with some even having him listed at second.

While Costa may be the finishing piece of a great puzzle at Chelsea, Sanchez is single - handedly keeping Arsenal alive this season, and it is hard to imagine he won't prove the catalyst to a great period of success if Arsene Wenger can build a better team around him in the next couple of transfer windows, with a player of this ability deserving a solid defence and midfield behind him to allow his talent to deliver more than just fourth place.

It's better to cut your losses rather than keeping an unhappy player who probably won't see a single minute of playing time.

I actually disagree with you, given the current circumstances our team is good enough to win this year, Leicester players cumulatively are no way better than our players (if you ask me «if we are good enough» at the begining of the season, I would say: hell no), but the tactics and the favoritism let's down... How can you justify him not signing a single outfield player last summer?

Rumors are that RM are not in for MBappe yet, the president highlighted how they prefer to sign players who have more than a single season of doing well, Zidane didn't join till he was mature and we can look at CR9 and Bale to see the other record signings have done it for more than a single season.

Minus sanzhez, name one single player at arsenal who's a winger and better than him at the moment.

Leroy sane is a far better player than alexis now.that kid can beat his man every single fxxxing time.alexis cuts in then run around.and believe me he wont score those goals of last season either.sell him to city

Hazard has backed up his promise to challenge for the crown of being named the best player on the planet with a simply sublime season, and he can lay claim to winning his side 11 points single - handedly this term — more than their current 10 - point gap at the top.

They have since gone on two win every single fixture, four thus far, so it's clear that the players are solely running on adrenaline at present and there's no better source of energy than that.

While it definitely has a «something borrowed» gameplay and visual style, and a instantly forgettable, brief single - player mode, its invigorating and intense Xbox Live multiplayer at such a well - worth - it bargain price provides gamers more than enough incentive to enlist into Section 8: Prejudice's call of duty.

With that said, the single player campaign is better than in Heroes 5 - each one in the series gets gradually better and better.

This might be a horrible back - handed comment on The Cartel, but playing it sparked me to go back and play some Bound in Blood, which has a far better single - player experience and I'd rather ride a horse in first - person than drive an SUV in first - person.

For good graphics, decent storyline and a good flow to gameplay in single player mode, Call of Duty is a slightly better game than 1942 in that the characters and situations seem more real given AI and ambient graphics and sound.

The game is better than call of duty: modern warfare, the single player mode is amazing.

Transformers Fall of Cybertron presents gamers with one of the best single - player campaigns to date with more Transformer lore and love than you can poke a stick at.

It's only fallen out of favour recently because of a glitch: if you lose your portal into wherever you were in the infinitely deep dungeon (the Shadow Vault), you have to start it all over again, it seems (at which point you might as well make a new character...) Single player only; roll on Torchlight 2 (which will have more than 3 classes, and co-op!)

This is a great game.I was pleased with the money I spent.Have yet to play it on - line but the single player A.I. is way better than expected so I only imagine that it's even funner with two players.I only had to revive my partner twice and he / she is always jumping in to help.

As well as the first game amzing graphics unbeliveable cinematics and just a fun unrepetitive game play (especialy the multiplayer) The reason I think it's a bit lamer than the first is because of the single player.

This is a great game.I was pleased with the money I spent.Have yet to play it on - line but the single player A.I. is way better than expected

Not once in single player mode did I experience any slowdown, not even when I would crash the Naboo n - I which looks better in this game than it did in Episode 1.

Some of the single player missions are better than others, but the full package definitely makes up for any small grievances that could be had.

The overall feel of the single player was much better than the original, in that there seems to be a lot more depth.

-- Features several new monsters — Subtle improvements and embellishments — 1080 native — Rextextured rather than rebuilt in HD — Improved loading times — 50 % more content than Tri — Most of the new content comes from the upper levels of the game like the G class quests — New monster: Brachydios — Brachydios is like a cross between a poisonous rhino and an extraordinarily aggressive, volcanic T - Rex — Brachydios enjoys slobbering explosive neon - green saliva all over its stumpy arms and then pile - driving you into the ground with them, leaving a residue of slime wherever it treads — Brachydios will go into rage mode after you hit him a few times and the green nodes on his head start to glow read — Expanded monster stamina system in Ultimate — Can more easily see when a monster is weakened or hurt — Monsters tire out more visibly — AI companions Cha - Cha and Kayumba can be used in single - player — Cha - Cha and Kayumba sing stat - boosting songs and have the odd stab at a monster during battle — The two are mainly used to distract the monster's attention — GamePad shows map — Mess around with your inventory on the GamePad as well — Target button in both versions lets you actually lock on to monsters

The games who take the best of their single - player content and use multiplayer as a unique test of those skills can actually add up to something more interesting than it might otherwise be.

Titanfall 2 is bigger and better than its predecessor, adding a ton of new content and features, including a short but immensely fun single player campaign.

The single player campaign does not run at 60 fps as was originally promised by ND but this is a small quibble, when the game looks better than almost all games before it.

This puzzle game will feature more than 150 different single - player levels, as well as a multiplayer battle mode.

Other than the main single - player mode, there is both a challenge mode and competitive mode included as well.

It has an excellent single player mode, certainly better than any FPS I've played in years.

It doesn't look any better than previous Call of Duty games — at least on Xbox 360, some shoddy shadows effects aside — and at around 5 hours or so the single player campaign isn't any longer than what we've seen before either.

Paired with a single - player that was way better than it had any reason to be (especially since it was mostly built out of assets made for the multiplayer mode), and For Honor remains one of my favourite game experiences of the year.

If you're one of those that are lacking the subscription to Playstation Plus, needed to access the multiplayer, then you will likely leave the game disappointed at a poor single player experience and you can do much, much better in the launch lineup than this.

A gallery that compares production sketches of Leonard's many tattoos with actual photographs is good for nothing more than a single look; a feature with more repeat value is a DVD player - ready duplication of the film's official website (otnemem.com), here simply labeled «Memento» (or «Otnemem,» depending on which version of the special features menu you happen to land on).

Sinlge player rocked, was much better than MW3 single player... However, MW3's online multiplayer experience is more fun, since it's not as realistic... Despite that, it's free.

- the scene at the beginning of a ceremony caused Shimamura a bit of trouble - the lines of the ritual did not properly reflect Zelda's personality, her motivations, her powerlessness, and awkwardness - Shimamura talked about it with Naoki Mori (who was in charge of Cinematic Design, including screenplay, and cutscenes)- the whole thing was rewritten several times, until they arrived at the final result - there's quite a lot of scenes she really likes in the game - her favorite line is the «Yes» Princess Zelda gives as an answer to the Deku Tree in a particular scene - in that scene, Zelda thinks about what she should do, but she can not see it at all - she refuses to give up, and wants to give hope to Link - Shimamura tried to convey all of those feelings through the single «Yes» she spoke - recording felt completely different than for animation, the dubbing of (foreign) movies, or other games - there was no fixed routine of how to approach it, as all different things were being tried out - lines were redone even after other lines were implemented in the game, as the team found better ways to say things - Shimamura finally managed to beat the game the other day, but she wants to keep practicing her shield surfing - Shimamura explains that she really gave it her whole when voicing Princess Zelda, to give her emotions - she hopes that players will remember their memories of Princess Zelda

Ghost Recon: Wildlands was the game — obviously — and I came away feeling that although perhaps the game would stand better as a single - player experience than it would a multiplayer one, there was no shortage of potential in that frankly vast Bolivian landscape.

Basically see if you can get a better score or time than your friends on the single player races.

Usually when I write a review I'll just add the value for money in the score bar at the bottom and not mention much about it other than in a summary, this games pricing has been set up differently to what we usually see, for example you can buy the full game for about # 30 OR if you're an online multiplayer fanatic and only want to play that part of the game you can buy the Multiplayer version for # 20, now if you've bought the multiplayer and fancy expanding to the full game it will cost you # 15 for the single player being # 5 over the original price, most will think that this is fair, you can get the multiplayer element cheaper and test it out, if you like it you can then grab the campaign, well, this is where it gets dark.