«So your position is, a decision was made very early on before voters had a say, and that's fine because the DCCC knows
better than the voters of the 6th Congressional District, and we should line up behind that candidate,» asked Tillemann during the conversation.
«Facebook allowed them to combine different data sources in a way that allowed them to understand voters maybe
better than voters themselves did,» says Dietram Scheufele, science communication professor at the University of Wisconsin - Madison.
Not exact matches
That means there is an incentive to keep expectations low, and to look for scapegoats, just in case
voters are feeling no
better in 2019
than they were in 2015.
In saying that the government stands with «consumers» — rather
than citizens or
voters or, God forbid, shareholders — Clement diminishes the federal government's importance, making it nothing more
than the complaints desk at the
Better Business Bureau.
The real estate mogul has cannily understood that despite polling that indicates most Americans see free trade as more of an opportunity
than a threat, a large and motivated minority of
voters have been yearning for a politician to call into question whether the trade deals we have on the books are
good for American workers.
That's all to the
good; I don't think it's an accident that the first wide - open
Best Picture race in decades coincides with the fact that a quarter of voting members have joined since 2014, and that a far lower percentage of them are straight, white male American elders
than is the case with the other 75 percent of
voters.
The Green Party has nominated Environmental Economics and Policy student Andrew Fehr, who faces the challenge of convincing Green - leaning
voters that actually voting for a Green Party is a
better choice
than a strategic vote for Ms. Duncan.
Given that a Democrat occupied the Oval Office between 2008 - 2016, and given that the economic condition of 90 % of all households declined during that period, it follows logically that empty promises of a Republican sounded
better to the general population of
voters than the empty promises of a Democrat.
How does he feel entitled to make any claim to be a
better Catholic
than Santorum (for that is what he's implicitly claiming) on questions that the church rightly leaves to the prudential judgment of
voters and public officials, within broad boundaries, when in the next breath he confesses his complete failure to be any kind of Catholic at all on a question on which the church speaks with categorical moral authority?
In Iowa, Romney did slightly
better among the 47 % of the
voters who stressed the ability to beat Obama (31 %) or having the right experience (16 %)
than did Santorum among the 49 % of the
voters who emphasized «true conservatism» (25 %) or «strong moral character» (24 %).
Two out of five
voters don't think Trump or Clinton would be a
good president; half say they're voting against a candidate rather
than in support of one.
But he still did
better among these
voters than among those who seldom or never attend services.
But Republican primary and caucus
voters have shown much
better judgment
than you would think given the....
But Republican primary and caucus
voters have shown much
better judgment
than you would think given the silly season polls of 2011.
Despite a slogan («Make America Great Again») that targeted oldster nostalgia and irritated young nonwhites whose ancestors were either in some other country or barred from voting in this one when America was allegedly great — and despite his stranger -
than - fiction gaffes and scandals, Trump did almost exactly as
well as Romney had among young
voters.
Well he doesn't have to «do» anything other
than be a few shades darker
than the average Alabama
voter to be considered a muslim.
In general, Democratic
voters seem less concerned with a candidate's faith life, though more who believed Clinton was religious were likely to think she would also be a
good president (69 %)
than those who didn't believe she was religious but would make a
good leader (54 %).
«For example, the gap among voting blocs that gave a B or
better to the Republicans versus the Democrats was greater among white evangelicals
than all other religious groups and all
voters, as reported in these data,» he wrote.
The awareness of the predicament (on the part of both the politicians at the microphones and the
voters in the streets) conceivably could lead to a reconstitution of the American idea, but the finding of the phoenix in the ashes presupposes a debate rising from an intellectual structure a
good deal sturdier
than the one lost in the wreckage of the World Trade Center.
Another oddity is that Bush did
better (58 - 40) among
voters attending mainline / oldline Protestant churches (e.g., American Baptist, Presbyterian Church USA, ELCA Lutheran, United Methodist)
than among the born - again.
Nice try on the Obama thing... except those same exit polls from»08 clearly showed that Obama did far
better than McCain with the more educated
voters.
This story does Romney more harm
than good — his religious affiliation should not be in the forefront —
voters might feel less inclined to vote for him.
Voters like Zach Lowe of ESPN and Ben Golliver of SI.com are voting for Simmons because he has had a
better season
than Mitchell.
Plus, in the case of this year, human
voters and some computers determined that Alabama was a
better, more deserving team
than Oklahoma State, but Oklahoma State gets the nod simply because they didn't have to play LSU in the regular season and Alabama did.
Contrary to conventional wisdom, I find that (1) it is
better to lose later in the season
than earlier, (2) AP
voters do not pay attention to the strength of a defeated opponent, and (3) the benefit of winning by a large margin is negligible.
The truth is that oddsmakers actually watch far more football
than the average Associated Press
voter and have a much
better gauge on the talent of each team.
Maybe he'll do
better than this year because of the
voters who simply won't vote for anybody except IMMORTALS (like Maddux) in their first year of eligibility.
Apparently that was enough to convince
voters that the Nittany Lions are still
better than USC.
Baseball players have been exhibiting monumental deficiencies of integrity and character for
well more
than a century, and it's just now that Hall of Fame
voters are going to take those words seriously?
Although all of the Oak Lawn votes had not yet been counted late Wednesday,
voters there were rejecting the measure by
better than a 2 - 1 ratio, stunning Park District officials who had seen them overwhelmingly approve an advisory referendum on the matter in November 2004.
More
than 7 in 10
voters and parents in Kentucky say that meals would be substantially
better if schools offered a greater variety of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains.
As you might recall, Crowley was less
than forthcoming earlier this week when asked by reporters about Lancman's claim the party is trying to siphon Jewish
voters away from him by running Gottlieb — a late add to the NY - 6 field who has
well - documented (thanks to Chris Bragg) ties to Meng and also (oddly) certain elements of the Queens GOP.
Ergo, since
voters don't always know what's
good for them, this gives rise to the category of moral wrongdoing called populism, in which politicians give
voters what they want, rather
than giving
voters what they would want if they were
better informed and / or
better at processing the relevant kind (s) of information.
«After his lopsided victory in the Republican primary, Paladino is now
better known by New York
voters — but not necessarily
better liked, other
than by Republican and conservative
voters,» said Siena pollster Steve Greenberg.
This may
well still happen, but with less
than three months to go until
voters go to the polls there remains zero evidence of it.
A study of
voters» social values provides a
better indicator of how they voted
than their political attitudes based on a left - right split.
These systems of knowledge about the function of parliament seem to be
better informed
than attending to the minutae of either side of the house, neither of which represents the economic interests in work of the majority of
voters.
«Rather
than rumor mongering, Team Turner might
better spend their time explaining their evolving positions on raising taxes and the 2nd amendment for Republican primary
voters,» Catalfamo said in response to my question about whether change was afoot in the Long campaign.
Especially given the complexities inherent in the world today (and therefore the depth of detail, legal obscurities, and the like represented in actual legislation), the ordinary
voter in a democracy may find his or her time
better spent on other activities
than doing enough research in order to form an opinion on each potential piece of legislation.
As for the last paragraph, VVD scores about the same domestically and internationally but D66, with similar policies (perhaps more migrant - friendly but otherwise I'm not sure how they differ), but with almost exclusively university - educated
voters, scores far
better internationally
than domestically.
That was
better than the marks
voters gave the Republican - led Senate and Democratic - controlled Assembly.
Wouldn't David Cameron have been
better not to pretend that Cornwall — rather
than Turkey — was the real summer holiday and rather reassure
voters that the Tories under him willnot revert to policies that entrench, nay, widen the income gap?
The same poll found that NYC
voters approve 56 - 37 percent of the job Cuomo is doing, and say 58 - 22 percent that he would be
better for the city
than Cynthia Nixon.
On key issues — fighting corruption, combating heroin abuse, controlling taxes, health care, education and job creation —
voters in majority or plurality margins believe Akshar would
better deal with them
than Fiala.
And though it's been viewed many fewer times
than Yes We Can, in this case it was particularly
well targeted, since the
voter in question is my sister - in - law, a Linux expert at IBM in Austin.
Philip Hammond had been in the job for more
than a year but our focus groups told us that few
voters recognised him - and almost half of those polled immediately after the budget said they actually didn't know if he was doing a
good job or not (almost 2/3 didn't know whether shadow chancellor, John McDonnell, would be any
better either).
The classic political conundrum exists here: the easiest way to stop a
voter from supporting you is to make them poorer
than they were under the previous administration, while the
best way to gain a vote is to make someone richer.
Although no electoral system is perfect, and the UK's First Past the Post method is worse
than most, parliamentary elections are a
better expression of democracy because unlike a referendum, there is no clear agenda setter: the agenda is contested between parties and candidates, the media, and, increasingly, via the internet, the
voters themselves.
A recent YouGov poll found 49 % of
voters thought Theresa May would make a
better prime minister
than Corbyn.
Female
voters who flocked to a casino caucus site Saturday morning said they liked Sanders but ultimately sided with Clinton, in part because they believed she would understand their issues
better than Sanders.