Belluck has used his own Twitter handle in recent days to dog the State Education Department over the results of third - through eighth - grade English and math test scores that showed charter school students performing slightly
better than their public school counterparts.
Not exact matches
As a group,
public universities in the top 40 performed
better than their private
counterparts, growing total assets by 44.5 percent compared with 24.7 percent for private
schools between the 2008 and 2014 fiscal years.
All this despite the fact that private
schooling doesn't actually yield
better outcomes for students, according to a recent Statistics Canada report (instead, the apparent academic success of private
school student is due to their socioeconomic backgrounds).9 A UBC study also found that students from
public schools scored higher in first - year university classes
than their private
school counterparts.10
For decades scholars and
public health officials have known that people with greater income or formal education tend to live longer and enjoy
better health
than their
counterparts who have less money or
schooling.
To quote from a famous interview given by James Coleman, cited in this book, «Catholic high
schools educate students
better than public schools do... students drop out four times more often
than their Catholic
school counterparts.»
In general, charter
schools that serve low - income and minority students in urban areas are doing a
better job
than their traditional
public -
school counterparts in raising student achievement, whereas that is not true of charter
schools in suburban areas.
In 2006, the National Center for Education Statistics found that
public school students do as
well as or
better than their private
school and charter
school counterparts.
In fact,
public charters are doing
better than their district
school counterparts at getting these at - risk students to graduate, as can be seen in data from the 2008 high
school cohort (students graduating four years later and released in 2013).
The study of charter
schools in 15 states and the District of Columbia found that, nationally, only 17 % of charter
schools do
better academically
than their traditional
counterparts, and more
than a third «deliver learning results that are significantly worse
than their student [s] would have realized had they remained in traditional
public schools.»
, found that for every charter performing
better than the traditional
public schools in its area, there are two charters either at or below or the performance of their
public school counterparts.
But the most extensive survey of student performance at charter
schools, from Stanford University's Center for Research on Education Outcomes, found that, of the 2,403 charter
schools tracked from 2006 to 2008, only 17 percent had
better math test results
than the
public schools in their area, while 37 percent had results that were «significantly below» those of the
public schools and 46 percent had results that were «statistically indistinguishable» from their
public -
school counterparts.
For example, the NAEP data reveal that charter fourth - graders in California and Arizona, representing fully a third of all charter
schools, do
better than their traditional
public school counterparts in reading performance.
While the report recognized a robust national demand for more charter
schools from parents and local communities, it found that 17 percent of charter
schools reported academic gains that were significantly
better than traditional
public schools, while 37 percent of charter
schools showed gains that were worse
than their traditional
public school counterparts, with 46 percent of charter
schools demonstrating no significant difference.
You can also do a curriculum check yourself, to ensure that the independent
schools you're considering follow courses of study that are the same or
better than their
public counterparts in your province.
On the contrary, a study of midcareer lawyers, surveyed five years and 15 years after graduating from the same
school, showed that
better - looking attorneys often chose a specialty that involved more contact with the
public, and they earned more money, billing at higher rates
than their
counterparts.