For example, the NAEP data reveal that charter fourth - graders in California and Arizona, representing fully a third of all charter schools, do
better than their traditional public school counterparts in reading performance.
Not exact matches
In general, charter
schools that serve low - income and minority students in urban areas are doing a
better job
than their
traditional public -
school counterparts in raising student achievement, whereas that is not true of charter
schools in suburban areas.
The study of charter
schools in 15 states and the District of Columbia found that, nationally, only 17 % of charter
schools do
better academically
than their
traditional counterparts, and more
than a third «deliver learning results that are significantly worse
than their student [s] would have realized had they remained in
traditional public schools.»
, found that for every charter performing
better than the
traditional public schools in its area, there are two charters either at or below or the performance of their
public school counterparts.
While the report recognized a robust national demand for more charter
schools from parents and local communities, it found that 17 percent of charter
schools reported academic gains that were significantly
better than traditional public schools, while 37 percent of charter
schools showed gains that were worse
than their
traditional public school counterparts, with 46 percent of charter
schools demonstrating no significant difference.